Motorist Blamed Neck Condition on Rear-Ender
On Jan. 3, 2015, plaintiff Allen Butts, 50, a medical technician, was stopped at McDade Boulevard while attempting to turn left onto Church Lane, in Yeadon. While he waited to make the turn, his sport utility vehicle was rear-ended by a sedan. He claimed permanent neck injuries.
March 23, 2018 at 02:48 PM
4 minute read
Butts v. Pendleton
$225K Verdict
Date of Verdict:
Feb. 20.
Court and Case No.:
C.P. Philadelphia No. 160901852.
Judge:
Frederica A. Massiah-Jackson.
Type of Action:
Motor vehicle.
Injuries:
Neck injury.
Plaintiffs Counsel:
Jessalyn Gillum, Simon & Simon, Philadelphia.
Defense Counsel:
Justin A. Schluth, Hubshman, Flood, Bullock & Dorn, Plymouth Meeting.
Plaintiffs Expert:
Dr. Mark Avart, orthopedic surgery, Philadelphia.
Defense Expert:
Sachin Dheer, radiology, Cherry Hill, New Jersey.
Comment:
On Jan. 3, 2015, plaintiff Allen Butts, 50, a medical technician, was stopped at McDade Boulevard while attempting to turn left onto Church Lane, in Yeadon. While he waited to make the turn, his sport utility vehicle was rear-ended by a sedan. He claimed permanent neck injuries.
Butts sued the sedan driver, Vasandra Pendleton, alleging that she was negligent.
Butts testified that he had been stopped and was about to turn left when he had to stop again, in order to let a group of children, who had run into the intersection, pass through. Butts' counsel faulted Pendleton for failing to maintain a safe distance behind Butts' vehicle.
Pendleton faulted Butts for causing the accident by coming to a sudden stop.
Following Pendleton's case-in-chief, Butts' counsel motioned for a directed verdict on the issue of negligence, which the court granted.
Butts claimed that a couple days after the accident, he began experiencing neck pain.
Two weeks post-accident, he presented to a chiropractor, with whom he treated three times a week for four months. He had an MRI and an EMG and was diagnosed with herniations at cervical intervertebral discs C3-4, C4-5, C5-6 and C6-7, and right-sided radiculopathy stemming from C6-7.
Butts said that he experienced numbness, tingling, and shooting pain throughout his right (dominant) arm, resulting in a loss of grip strength. Epidural injections were recommended but Butts declined. No further treatment was rendered.
Butts' expert in orthopedic surgery casually related his injuries and treatment to the accident, and he opined that he had suffered a permanent neck injury. The expert recommended future epidural and trigger-point injections, which were estimated at $5,000 to $10,000 per year.
Butts testified that he continues to experience radicular arm pain and loss of grip strength. He stated that this interferes with his job duties as a medical technician. Part of his job is to refill the various surgical solutions in the operating room. Due to his right arm limitations, he requires assistance to lift some of the solution containers, whereas before he did not need assistance. Additionally, prior to the accident, he was able to push a cart containing all of the medical supplies to distribute to the different operating rooms in one delivery. Now, however, he can only push a cart that carries less supplies, which requires him to make multiple deliveries. He sought damages for past and future pain and suffering.
Pendleton's expert in radiology opined that Butts' films exhibited degenerative changes with no evidence of a traumatic injury.
Pendleton's counsel questioned Butts' alleged injuries since he waited two weeks before seeking medical attention and he declined to receive injections.
The jury determined that Pendleton was liable for causing serious injury to Butts, who was determined to receive $225,000.
— This report originally appeared in VerdictSearch, an ALM publication. •
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPittsburgh Judge Rules Loan Company's Online Arbitration Agreement Unenforceable
3 minute readDe-Mystifying the Ethics of the Attorney Transition Process, Part 1
Risk Mitigation: Employee Engagement Results in Fewer Lawsuits (and Other Benefits)
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Restoring Trust in the Courts Starts in New York
- 2'Pull Back the Curtain': Ex-NFL Players Seek Discovery in Lawsuit Over League's Disability Plan
- 3Tensions Run High at Final Hearing Before Manhattan Congestion Pricing Takes Effect
- 4Improper Removal to Fed. Court Leads to $100K Bill for Blue Cross Blue Shield
- 5Michael Halpern, Beloved Key West Attorney, Dies at 72
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250