Large Pa. Firms Saw Steady, Rate-Driven Growth Last Year
Pennsylvania-born firms mostly reported at least modest revenue and profit growth last year.
March 26, 2018 at 03:57 PM
4 minute read
While few would call it a blockbuster year, large Pennsylvania-based law firms mostly had a positive 2017, enjoying modest to strong growth in revenue and profitability.
With demand in the industry largely flat, the growth appeared to be driven by rate increases, and in some cases by geographic and practice group expansion.
Of the eight Pennsylvania-founded Am Law 100 firms that have shared 2017 financial results with the Legal Intelligencer, all but one reported growth in gross revenue compared to 2016. And all of them saw revenue per lawyer and profits per equity partner increase year-over-year.
“That's consistent with what we've seen so far nationwide,” said consultant Eric Seeger of Altman Weil Inc. He said much of that growth is driven by rate increases, and in some instances firms are showing revenue improvements after “some rather dismal years.”
“Two percent revenue growth is treated as good news these days, which shows a recalibration of expectations,” Seeger noted.
Gross revenue growth varied, including modest gains at Blank Rome (2.1 percent) and Duane Morris (2.6 percent). Cozen O'Connor had the greatest increase in gross revenue, at 10.7 percent, in a year when the firm was constantly making lateral hires. It was the only one of the eight to have double-digit revenue growth.
Just one of the firms, Pepper Hamilton, reported a decline in gross revenue from 2016 to 2017, dropping by 1.7 percent to $341.8 million. But Pepper Hamilton's revenue per lawyer increased as head count shrank.
The other firms whose results have been reported in the Legal showed growth of 3 percent or more, including Reed Smith (4.1 percent), Dechert (7.3 percent), Drinker Biddle & Reath (6.3 percent) and Ballard Spahr (3.4 percent).
Among the eight firms, profitability improvements were all over the board. Blank Rome was essentially flat, on the one end, with PPP increasing by just half a percent. But Pepper Hamilton saw PPP grow by more than 14 percent, partially recovering from a 2016 when partner profits tanked.
All eight firms saw revenue per lawyer increase by a single-digit percentage, ranging from a high of 6 percent at Pepper Hamilton and Ballard Spahr to a low of 1.1 percent at Duane Morris.
Finding Balance on Rates
Seeger said law firms have generally told him they outperformed their expectations in 2017, largely due to conservative budgeting at the outset of the year. And while rate pressure has not gone away, firms have learned that failing to raise rates one year makes it all the more difficult to do so the following year, he said.
“Firms are back in the habit of increasing their rates, and they discount the rates back down where necessary,” Seeger said. “Overall that yields an increase in collections.”
Leaders of Pennsylvania firms confirmed that they did raise rates in 2017 by around 3 percent or 3 to 5 percent depending on the practice. But most said they are more focused on other variables that effect collections and revenue.
The ability to grow, is “about market share and the type of work you're getting,” rather than rate increases, said Drinker Biddle chairman Andrew Kassner, as pressure on budgets, value and efficiency increases. Thinking back on when law firms could increase rates by 7 percent a year every year, he said, “that era is over.”
Reed Smith global managing partner Alexander Thomas said his firm raised rates in some practices, but “one of the things we focused on more than ever in 2017 was realizing more of the rates we charge.” That effort included doing some work on a fixed-fee basis and improving efficiency on matters, and resulted in a slight improvement in realization, he said.
Generally, firm leaders said they are open to alternative fee arrangements, and that such arrangements are being used more often. But their popularity, while increasing steadily, has not spiked, Dechert chair Andrew Levander said.
“When you give clients an idea of pricing and how that's going to play out, it really is a win-win,” said Grant Palmer, litigation chair and incoming managing partner at Blank Rome. He said his firm, like the others, is working toward implementing those arrangements more, and doing so profitably.
“It's not something you can do overnight,” Palmer said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'The World Didn't End This Morning': Phila. Firm Leaders Respond to Election Results
4 minute readSettlement With Kleinbard in Diversity Contracting Tiff Allows Pa. Lawyer to Avoid Sanctions
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250