Large Pa. Firms Saw Steady, Rate-Driven Growth Last Year
Pennsylvania-born firms mostly reported at least modest revenue and profit growth last year.
March 26, 2018 at 03:57 PM
4 minute read
While few would call it a blockbuster year, large Pennsylvania-based law firms mostly had a positive 2017, enjoying modest to strong growth in revenue and profitability.
With demand in the industry largely flat, the growth appeared to be driven by rate increases, and in some cases by geographic and practice group expansion.
Of the eight Pennsylvania-founded Am Law 100 firms that have shared 2017 financial results with the Legal Intelligencer, all but one reported growth in gross revenue compared to 2016. And all of them saw revenue per lawyer and profits per equity partner increase year-over-year.
“That's consistent with what we've seen so far nationwide,” said consultant Eric Seeger of Altman Weil Inc. He said much of that growth is driven by rate increases, and in some instances firms are showing revenue improvements after “some rather dismal years.”
“Two percent revenue growth is treated as good news these days, which shows a recalibration of expectations,” Seeger noted.
Gross revenue growth varied, including modest gains at Blank Rome (2.1 percent) and Duane Morris (2.6 percent). Cozen O'Connor had the greatest increase in gross revenue, at 10.7 percent, in a year when the firm was constantly making lateral hires. It was the only one of the eight to have double-digit revenue growth.
Just one of the firms, Pepper Hamilton, reported a decline in gross revenue from 2016 to 2017, dropping by 1.7 percent to $341.8 million. But Pepper Hamilton's revenue per lawyer increased as head count shrank.
The other firms whose results have been reported in the Legal showed growth of 3 percent or more, including Reed Smith (4.1 percent), Dechert (7.3 percent), Drinker Biddle & Reath (6.3 percent) and Ballard Spahr (3.4 percent).
Among the eight firms, profitability improvements were all over the board. Blank Rome was essentially flat, on the one end, with PPP increasing by just half a percent. But Pepper Hamilton saw PPP grow by more than 14 percent, partially recovering from a 2016 when partner profits tanked.
All eight firms saw revenue per lawyer increase by a single-digit percentage, ranging from a high of 6 percent at Pepper Hamilton and Ballard Spahr to a low of 1.1 percent at Duane Morris.
|Finding Balance on Rates
Seeger said law firms have generally told him they outperformed their expectations in 2017, largely due to conservative budgeting at the outset of the year. And while rate pressure has not gone away, firms have learned that failing to raise rates one year makes it all the more difficult to do so the following year, he said.
“Firms are back in the habit of increasing their rates, and they discount the rates back down where necessary,” Seeger said. “Overall that yields an increase in collections.”
Leaders of Pennsylvania firms confirmed that they did raise rates in 2017 by around 3 percent or 3 to 5 percent depending on the practice. But most said they are more focused on other variables that effect collections and revenue.
The ability to grow, is “about market share and the type of work you're getting,” rather than rate increases, said Drinker Biddle chairman Andrew Kassner, as pressure on budgets, value and efficiency increases. Thinking back on when law firms could increase rates by 7 percent a year every year, he said, “that era is over.”
Reed Smith global managing partner Alexander Thomas said his firm raised rates in some practices, but “one of the things we focused on more than ever in 2017 was realizing more of the rates we charge.” That effort included doing some work on a fixed-fee basis and improving efficiency on matters, and resulted in a slight improvement in realization, he said.
Generally, firm leaders said they are open to alternative fee arrangements, and that such arrangements are being used more often. But their popularity, while increasing steadily, has not spiked, Dechert chair Andrew Levander said.
“When you give clients an idea of pricing and how that's going to play out, it really is a win-win,” said Grant Palmer, litigation chair and incoming managing partner at Blank Rome. He said his firm, like the others, is working toward implementing those arrangements more, and doing so profitably.
“It's not something you can do overnight,” Palmer said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'The World Didn't End This Morning': Phila. Firm Leaders Respond to Election Results
4 minute readSettlement With Kleinbard in Diversity Contracting Tiff Allows Pa. Lawyer to Avoid Sanctions
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250