Chesco Jury Awards $20M Following Death of Spinal Surgery Patient
The jury deliberated less than 90 minutes before returning the verdict against the Laser Spine Institute and Dr. Glenn Rubenstein.
March 29, 2018 at 05:13 PM
3 minute read
A Chester County jury awarded $20 million to the family of a woman who died after she was allegedly discharged prematurely from a spinal surgery center.
The jury deliberating in Kimble v. Laser Spine Institute handed down the verdict Wednesday afternoon following eight days of trial. Along with awarding $10 million each to the estate of Sharon Kimble and her husband Robert Kimble, the jury also awarded liability against both the Laser Spine Institute and Dr. Glenn Rubenstein, the anesthesiologist who treated Kimble.
The case stemmed from allegations the spinal institute discharged Sharon Kimble while she still had a significant amount of the anesthetic Dilaudid in her system. The plaintiff contended the facility should have continued to monitor Kimble, who was found dead hours after clinicians discharged her with instructions to take additional pain medication.
Attorney Lane Jubb of The Beasley Firm said he told the jury that medical staff allegedly prematurely discharged Kimble to free up space at the surgery center so doctors could begin a procedure for another patient.
“The jury appreciated the lack of specialized patient care and saw the treatment for what it was, which was a production line,” Jubb said, adding that the jury appeared to be “offended” by the defense's argument that the husband was partially at fault. “Blaming the husband for failing to pay close attention to his wife in the hotel, and suggesting that she would be alive was offensive to logic, since it was their position that she could have been discharged in that state anyway.”
According to the plaintiff's pretrial memo, Kimble was 50 in January 2014 when she underwent the procedure. She had chronic back pain, and had been taking narcotic pain medication for seven years before the procedure.
The Kimbles, court papers said, were from Ohio, and so they stayed at a hotel close to the surgery center. Court papers said the spinal center instructed Kimble to take her pain medication up to and including the day of the surgery.
The Kimbles' pretrial memo said that, although she had received six times the amount of Dilaudid than was initially ordered, she was discharged from the surgery center two hours after the procedure. Kimble was found dead in the hotel a few hours later.
According to court records, the defendants contended that the treatment had been proper, and that the high dosage of Dilaudid was necessary because Kimble had a high tolerance for pain medication, given how long she had been taking medication to treat her back pain.
Anesthesiology expert Dr. James Noone testified for the defense that Kimble's husband failed to properly monitor Kimble following the surgery, and that Robert Kimble likely could have prevented her death if he had called emergency services.
Chester County Court of Common Pleas Judge William Mahon tried the case. The jury reached a decision after less than 90 minutes of deliberation, according to Jubb. It found the surgical center 65 percent liable and Rubenstein 35 percent liable.
Lansdale attorney Kevin Wright represented the defendants. Wright's office declined to comment.
General counsel for the Laser Spine Institute, Bethany Wharrie, did not return a call for comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPhila. Med Mal Lawyers In for Busy Year as Court Adjusts for Filing Boom
3 minute read'Recover, Reflect, Retool and Retry': Lessons From Women Atop Pa. Legal Community
3 minute readEDPA's New Chief Judge Plans to Advance Efforts to Combat Threats to Judiciary
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250