Cosby's Confidential Settlement Sum May Come Out at Trial
The amount Bill Cosby paid to Andrea Constand in 2006 after she sued him for sexual assault may finally be revealed in the coming weeks, as Cosby again stands trial in a criminal court case that began with jury selection on Monday.
April 03, 2018 at 11:11 AM
3 minute read
Bill Cosby, accompanied by Andrew Wyatt, departs after a pretrial hearing in Cosby's sexual assault case at the Montgomery County Courthouse in Norristown on Aug. 22, 2017. Photo: Matt Rourke/AP
The amount Bill Cosby paid to Andrea Constand in 2006 after she sued him for sexual assault may finally be revealed in the coming weeks, as Cosby again stands trial in a criminal court case that began with jury selection on Monday.
In an order dated Monday and made public Tuesday morning, Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas Judge Steven T. O'Neill ruled that certain facts about the civil action Constand v. Cosby would be admitted as evidence at trial, including the monetary amount of settlement and the “four corners of the settlement agreement.”
The order represents a win for prosecutors, who had asked for admission of the civil case and settlement negotiations.
Also Monday, O'Neill granted Cosby's motion seeking to admit testimony from Marguerite Jackson. Jackson, according to the defense, is a former co-worker of Constand's who would testify that Constand once told Jackson she could lie about her alleged assault in order to secure a payout.
O'Neill also granted the prosecutors' motion to preclude evidence from two ongoing lawsuits involving Constand and former Montgomery County District Attorney Bruce Castor Jr.—Constand v. Castor and Castor v. Constand. Constand is suing Castor for defamation based on his statements about her accusations against Cosby. And Castor is suing Constand, alleging that she brought the defamation suit in order to destroy Castor's political career.
Castor made the decision in 2005 not to prosecute Cosby based on Constand's allegations. He has said that he did so in part because he thought Constand would be better off filing a civil lawsuit. His complaint referred to the 2006 settlement as a “multimillion-dollar resolution.”
Both sides have filed many motions in limine leading up to the retrial. Late last week, O'Neill denied a motion by the defense seeking his recusal from the case, which the defense had sought on the basis of O'Neill's wife's activism on behalf of sexual assault victims.
Jury selection in Cosby's retrial is underway, having begun Monday, and opening arguments are set to begin April 9. The proceedings are reportedly expected to last about a month, and jurors are to be sequestered throughout the trial.
The first criminal trial took place last June. It ended with a hung jury, and O'Neill declared a mistrial.
A spokesman for Cosby's legal team did not immediately respond to a request for comment Tuesday morning. Neither did a spokeswoman for the Montgomery County District Attorney's Office.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
'Recover, Reflect, Retool and Retry': Lessons From Women Atop Pa. Legal Community
3 minute read
EDPA's New Chief Judge Plans to Advance Efforts to Combat Threats to Judiciary
3 minute read
Pa. Superior Court's Next Leader Looks Ahead to Looming Challenges in Coming Years
3 minute read
Trending Stories
- 1Gordon Rees Opens 80th Office, ‘Collaboration Hub’ in Palo Alto
- 2The White Stripes Drop Copyright Claim Against Trump Campaign
- 3Law Firm Accused of Barratry for Allegedly Soliciting Crash Victims
- 4Carlton Fields Downsizes in Move to New Atlanta Office
- 5Trump's Selection of Zeldin to Head EPA Draws Surprise, Little Hope of Avoiding Deregulation
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
