Cosby's Confidential Settlement Sum May Come Out at Trial
The amount Bill Cosby paid to Andrea Constand in 2006 after she sued him for sexual assault may finally be revealed in the coming weeks, as Cosby again stands trial in a criminal court case that began with jury selection on Monday.
April 03, 2018 at 11:11 AM
3 minute read
The amount Bill Cosby paid to Andrea Constand in 2006 after she sued him for sexual assault may finally be revealed in the coming weeks, as Cosby again stands trial in a criminal court case that began with jury selection on Monday.
In an order dated Monday and made public Tuesday morning, Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas Judge Steven T. O'Neill ruled that certain facts about the civil action Constand v. Cosby would be admitted as evidence at trial, including the monetary amount of settlement and the “four corners of the settlement agreement.”
The order represents a win for prosecutors, who had asked for admission of the civil case and settlement negotiations.
Also Monday, O'Neill granted Cosby's motion seeking to admit testimony from Marguerite Jackson. Jackson, according to the defense, is a former co-worker of Constand's who would testify that Constand once told Jackson she could lie about her alleged assault in order to secure a payout.
O'Neill also granted the prosecutors' motion to preclude evidence from two ongoing lawsuits involving Constand and former Montgomery County District Attorney Bruce Castor Jr.—Constand v. Castor and Castor v. Constand. Constand is suing Castor for defamation based on his statements about her accusations against Cosby. And Castor is suing Constand, alleging that she brought the defamation suit in order to destroy Castor's political career.
Castor made the decision in 2005 not to prosecute Cosby based on Constand's allegations. He has said that he did so in part because he thought Constand would be better off filing a civil lawsuit. His complaint referred to the 2006 settlement as a “multimillion-dollar resolution.”
Both sides have filed many motions in limine leading up to the retrial. Late last week, O'Neill denied a motion by the defense seeking his recusal from the case, which the defense had sought on the basis of O'Neill's wife's activism on behalf of sexual assault victims.
Jury selection in Cosby's retrial is underway, having begun Monday, and opening arguments are set to begin April 9. The proceedings are reportedly expected to last about a month, and jurors are to be sequestered throughout the trial.
The first criminal trial took place last June. It ended with a hung jury, and O'Neill declared a mistrial.
A spokesman for Cosby's legal team did not immediately respond to a request for comment Tuesday morning. Neither did a spokeswoman for the Montgomery County District Attorney's Office.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPhila. Med Mal Lawyers In for Busy Year as Court Adjusts for Filing Boom
3 minute read'Recover, Reflect, Retool and Retry': Lessons From Women Atop Pa. Legal Community
3 minute readEDPA's New Chief Judge Plans to Advance Efforts to Combat Threats to Judiciary
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250