Capitol Report
Following is a listing of executive, legislative, judicial and advocacy activity for the week of April 2. Members of the General Assembly were in recess at press time. Members of the state House of Representatives were set to return to session on Monday; members of the Pennsylvania Senate were scheduled to return to session on April 16.
April 05, 2018 at 05:27 PM
4 minute read
Pennsylvania State Capitol. Photo credit: Zack Frank/Shutterstock.com |
Opioid Crisis
Gov. Tom Wolf on April 4 announced the renewal of his 90-day opioid disaster declaration, which was introduced in January and set to expire on Tuesday. The renewal allows for 13 anti-opioid initiatives introduced in the past 90 days to continue without interruption and for the introduction of new measures to help those suffering from opioid addiction, a statement from the Wolf administration said.
“Extending this declaration will allow us to continue our efforts to break down silos and enhance collaboration across state government,” Wolf said. “Throughout the next 90 days, we will work to expand our efforts to include additional state agencies and commissions as necessary, so that we can direct our help to more communities across the commonwealth.”
Among several measures extended by the declaration are Secretary of Health Dr. Rachel Levine's naloxone leave-behind standing order, which allows first responders, in the wake of an emergency call, to leave overdose survivors with the treatment and instructions on how to use it.
|Public Health
On April 4, Wolf was joined by Pennsylvania Sen. Jay Costa, D-Allegheny, leader of the Senate Democrats, to announce legislation—Senate Bill 1001—that would empower the secretary of health to declare a public health emergency, creating a more streamlined vehicle for deploying resources specific to that emergency—which would apply in a health crisis of any nature.
The announcement was made at the same press event in which Wolf renewed the opioid disaster declaration. According to an administration statement, one option that has been unavailable to Wolf is the authority to formally declare a public health emergency.
“We need more tools to beat back the addiction crisis sweeping Pennsylvania, and I'm hopeful that a public health emergency designation will help the administration cut red tape and find creative solutions,” Costa said.
|Distracted Driving
Distracted driving citations in Pennsylvania jumped by 52 percent last year and have increased 172 percent since 2013, according to a report issued by the Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts on April 2, a day before a legislative hearing on the topic.
According to an infographic released by the AOPC, Montgomery County led the state with 11 percent of all distracted-driving citations issued.
The state House of Representatives Transportation Committee met on April 3 to consider two proposals: House Bill 892, which would strengthen penalties for those cited for careless driving when the case stemmed from electronic distraction; and House Bill 1684, which would make it illegal to use a cellphone without a hands-free device while driving.
|Parental Rights
The National Parents Organization of Pennsylvania on April 4 announced it is organizing a rally on April 25 at the Capitol Rotunda in Harrisburg.
The event is set to happen at a time when Pennsylvania legislators are considering two bills—House Bill 443 and House Bill 1349—aimed at supporting shared parenting after separation or divorce and combatting parental alienation.
Stephen Meehan, chairman of National Parents Organization of Pennsylvania, said in a press statement: “Shared parenting can prevent attempts to alienate a child from a fit parent.
However, far too often, the courts order sole custody to one parent after a bitter, winner-take-all custody battle instead of ensuring children have both loving, fit parents in their lives. Often, a noncustodial parent has so little time with the child, the winning parent is empowered to knowingly or unknowingly marginalize the child from a fit and loving parent, creating heartbreak for child and parent. The marginalization alienates children and the parents.”
In recent years, Kentucky, Utah, South Dakota, Missouri and Minnesota have enacted similar reforms, the organization said in a statement. •
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCapitol Report: Additional Common Pleas Judges, Professional Licesnsing
Capitol Report: Prescription Coverage, Striking Workers, Stormwater Management
Trending Stories
- 1The Distribution of Dangerous Products Via Online Marketplaces
- 2The Products Liability Case Against Tianeptine: The Deadly ‘Dietary Supplement’ Found at Your Local Store
- 3The Evolving Landscape of Joint and Several Liability in Pa.: A Post-'Spencer' Analysis
- 4A Deep Dive Into the Product-Line Exception in Pennsylvania
- 5When Personal Injury and Family Law Collide
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250