Horse Farm Alleged Defamation, Breach of Services Contract
In July 2012, plaintiff Michael Jester, of Penn Ridge Farms LLC, and Robert Hutt, of Fantasy Lane Thoroughbred Racing Stable LLC, entered into a contract by which Penn Ridge agreed to provide boarding and breeding services to Fantasy Lane's thoroughbred stallion and broodmares at its farms, in Harrisburg.
April 05, 2018 at 02:35 PM
3 minute read
Jester v. Hutt
$200,000 Verdict
Date of Verdict: Feb. 9.
Court and Case No.: U.S. District Court, M.D. Pa. No. 1:15-cv-00205-YK.
Judge: Yvette Kane.
Type of Action: Breach of Contract.
Injuries: Defamation.
Plaintiffs Counsel: Mark D. Bradshaw, Stevens & Lee, Harrisburg.
Defense Counsel: Gordon A. Einhorn, Thomas, Thomas & Hafer, Harrisburg.
Comment:
In July 2012, plaintiff Michael Jester, of Penn Ridge Farms LLC, and Robert Hutt, of Fantasy Lane Thoroughbred Racing Stable LLC, entered into a contract by which Penn Ridge agreed to provide boarding and breeding services to Fantasy Lane's thoroughbred stallion and broodmares at its farms, in Harrisburg.
Additionally, under the contract, Penn Ridge would act as Fantasy Lane's agent for the promotion and management of its thoroughbred stallion, Uptowncharlybrown, and would exercise good faith in promoting, managing and selling Uptowncharlybrown's stallion seasons.
Jester asserted that about a year into the contract, Fantasy Lane stopped paying the contractual monthly fee of approximately $11,000 to board and breed the company's horses. Additionally, Hutt began to defame Penn Ridge through emails.
Jester and Penn Ridge sued Hutt, Fantasy Lane and its related entities, alleging breach of contract and defamation.
Plaintiffs counsel presented the monthly invoices that the defendants allegedly failed to pay. Counsel also presented multiple emails that Hutt had distributed to hundreds of individuals in the horse-breeding and racing industry in which Hutt allegedly criticized the quality of care that Fantasy Lane's horses had been receiving at Penn Ridge. Penn Ridge, itself, had been on the contact list of the intended email recipients.
Hutt and Fantasy Lane denied the allegations and brought counterclaims of negligence, breach of contract and breach of fiduciary duty. Counsel maintained that the plaintiffs did not fulfill their contractual obligations to promote and manage Uptowncharlybrown's stallion seasons, and that they failed to exercise good faith in securing a successful breeding season for the horse.
According to the defense, numerous Fantasy Lane horses had been injured while stabled at Penn Ridge. Several of the horses contracted worms and Potomac Horse Fever, with one broodmare and her unborn foal both succumbing to the disease. Additionally, a foal suffered a broken leg while separated from its mother and had to be euthanized, the defense contended.
Plaintiffs counsel maintained that the Fantasy Lane horses were treated with the utmost care and their treatment was in accordance to the parties' contract. Plaintiffs counsel noted that Potomac Horse Fever was a regionwide disease that was unpreventable and had infected Penn Ridge's own horses. Moreover, foals separating from their mothers and suffering leg injuries is common at any horse farm, plaintiffs counsel noted.
The plaintiffs presented the unpaid invoices, which totaled approximately $65,000.
Fantasy Lane, in its counterclaim, suggested that the failure to promote Uptowncharlybrown cost the company millions.
The jury found in favor of Michael Jester and Penn Ridge Farms, awarding damages of $200,000. It also found in favor of the plaintiffs on the defendants' counterclaims.
The trial lasted one week.
This report is based on information that was provided by plaintiffs counsel. Defense counsel did not respond to calls for comment.
—This report first appeared in VerdictSearch, an ALM publication
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![Pa. Federal District Courts Reach Full Complement Following Latest Confirmation Pa. Federal District Courts Reach Full Complement Following Latest Confirmation](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/38/82/ff7b611443519b770a19692401f4/weilheimer-neary-henry-767x633.jpg)
Pa. Federal District Courts Reach Full Complement Following Latest Confirmation
![The Defense Bar Is Feeling the Strain: Busy Med Mal Trial Schedules Might Be Phila.'s 'New Normal' The Defense Bar Is Feeling the Strain: Busy Med Mal Trial Schedules Might Be Phila.'s 'New Normal'](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/thelegalintelligencer/contrib/content/uploads/sites/402/2023/01/Philadelphia-City-Hall-08-767x633.jpg)
The Defense Bar Is Feeling the Strain: Busy Med Mal Trial Schedules Might Be Phila.'s 'New Normal'
7 minute read![Federal Judge Allows Elderly Woman's Consumer Protection Suit to Proceed Against Citizens Bank Federal Judge Allows Elderly Woman's Consumer Protection Suit to Proceed Against Citizens Bank](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/ba/3b/495247be47fe8b0ba5fcd60e024b/citizens-bank-sign-767x633.jpg)
Federal Judge Allows Elderly Woman's Consumer Protection Suit to Proceed Against Citizens Bank
5 minute read![Judge Leaves Statute of Limitations Question in Injury Crash Suit for a Jury Judge Leaves Statute of Limitations Question in Injury Crash Suit for a Jury](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/thelegalintelligencer/contrib/content/uploads/sites/399/2024/07/18-wheeler-semi-truck-767x633.jpg)
Judge Leaves Statute of Limitations Question in Injury Crash Suit for a Jury
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1ACC CLO Survey Waves Warning Flags for Boards
- 2States Accuse Trump of Thwarting Court's Funding Restoration Order
- 3Microsoft Becomes Latest Tech Company to Face Claims of Stealing Marketing Commissions From Influencers
- 4Coral Gables Attorney Busted for Stalking Lawyer
- 5Trump's DOJ Delays Releasing Jan. 6 FBI Agents List Under Consent Order
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250