Horse Farm Alleged Defamation, Breach of Services Contract
In July 2012, plaintiff Michael Jester, of Penn Ridge Farms LLC, and Robert Hutt, of Fantasy Lane Thoroughbred Racing Stable LLC, entered into a contract by which Penn Ridge agreed to provide boarding and breeding services to Fantasy Lane's thoroughbred stallion and broodmares at its farms, in Harrisburg.
April 05, 2018 at 02:35 PM
3 minute read
Jester v. Hutt
$200,000 Verdict
Date of Verdict: Feb. 9.
Court and Case No.: U.S. District Court, M.D. Pa. No. 1:15-cv-00205-YK.
Judge: Yvette Kane.
Type of Action: Breach of Contract.
Injuries: Defamation.
Plaintiffs Counsel: Mark D. Bradshaw, Stevens & Lee, Harrisburg.
Defense Counsel: Gordon A. Einhorn, Thomas, Thomas & Hafer, Harrisburg.
Comment:
In July 2012, plaintiff Michael Jester, of Penn Ridge Farms LLC, and Robert Hutt, of Fantasy Lane Thoroughbred Racing Stable LLC, entered into a contract by which Penn Ridge agreed to provide boarding and breeding services to Fantasy Lane's thoroughbred stallion and broodmares at its farms, in Harrisburg.
Additionally, under the contract, Penn Ridge would act as Fantasy Lane's agent for the promotion and management of its thoroughbred stallion, Uptowncharlybrown, and would exercise good faith in promoting, managing and selling Uptowncharlybrown's stallion seasons.
Jester asserted that about a year into the contract, Fantasy Lane stopped paying the contractual monthly fee of approximately $11,000 to board and breed the company's horses. Additionally, Hutt began to defame Penn Ridge through emails.
Jester and Penn Ridge sued Hutt, Fantasy Lane and its related entities, alleging breach of contract and defamation.
Plaintiffs counsel presented the monthly invoices that the defendants allegedly failed to pay. Counsel also presented multiple emails that Hutt had distributed to hundreds of individuals in the horse-breeding and racing industry in which Hutt allegedly criticized the quality of care that Fantasy Lane's horses had been receiving at Penn Ridge. Penn Ridge, itself, had been on the contact list of the intended email recipients.
Hutt and Fantasy Lane denied the allegations and brought counterclaims of negligence, breach of contract and breach of fiduciary duty. Counsel maintained that the plaintiffs did not fulfill their contractual obligations to promote and manage Uptowncharlybrown's stallion seasons, and that they failed to exercise good faith in securing a successful breeding season for the horse.
According to the defense, numerous Fantasy Lane horses had been injured while stabled at Penn Ridge. Several of the horses contracted worms and Potomac Horse Fever, with one broodmare and her unborn foal both succumbing to the disease. Additionally, a foal suffered a broken leg while separated from its mother and had to be euthanized, the defense contended.
Plaintiffs counsel maintained that the Fantasy Lane horses were treated with the utmost care and their treatment was in accordance to the parties' contract. Plaintiffs counsel noted that Potomac Horse Fever was a regionwide disease that was unpreventable and had infected Penn Ridge's own horses. Moreover, foals separating from their mothers and suffering leg injuries is common at any horse farm, plaintiffs counsel noted.
The plaintiffs presented the unpaid invoices, which totaled approximately $65,000.
Fantasy Lane, in its counterclaim, suggested that the failure to promote Uptowncharlybrown cost the company millions.
The jury found in favor of Michael Jester and Penn Ridge Farms, awarding damages of $200,000. It also found in favor of the plaintiffs on the defendants' counterclaims.
The trial lasted one week.
This report is based on information that was provided by plaintiffs counsel. Defense counsel did not respond to calls for comment.
—This report first appeared in VerdictSearch, an ALM publication
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFederal Judge Allows Elderly Woman's Consumer Protection Suit to Proceed Against Citizens Bank
5 minute readJudge Leaves Statute of Limitations Question in Injury Crash Suit for a Jury
4 minute readSupreme Court's Ruling in 'Students for Fair Admissions' and Its Impact on DEI Initiatives in the Workplace
6 minute readMembership Has Its Privileges: Bankruptcy Court Examines LLC's Authority to File Bankruptcy
8 minute readTrending Stories
- 12 Federal Judges Rescind Senior Status After Trump Win. Might More Follow?
- 2Japan Highlights Burr & Forman Director's 'Body Of Work' With Highest Honor
- 3Unanswered Questions on Remote Work Complicate NJ Wage Transparency Law, Litigators Say
- 4DeSantis Appointed Assistant US Attorney to Broward Circuit Court Bench
- 5Thomson Reuters Plans to Spend Big in AI. Here’s How
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250