DA: Cosby Paid Accuser Constand $3M in 2006 Settlement
On the first day of Bill Cosby's retrial, jurors learned that Cosby paid more than $3 million in 2006 to keep his accuser, Andrea Constand, from talking about their civil suit over an alleged sexual assault.
April 09, 2018 at 04:49 PM
3 minute read
Andrea Constand.
On the first day of Bill Cosby's retrial, jurors learned that Cosby paid more than $3 million in 2006 to keep his accuser, Andrea Constand, from talking about their civil suit over an alleged sexual assault.
During opening arguments Monday in Norristown, Montgomery County District Attorney Kevin Steele told the jury that Constand sued Cosby in 2005, after learning that law enforcement would not bring charges against him based on her allegations that he drugged and sexually assaulted her.
The civil suit resulted in a settlement of $3.38 million, Steele said, and required that Constand stay quiet about the outcome or underlying facts of the civil case.
Steele also noted that Constand did not approach law enforcement again about her allegations after the settlement. Instead, he said, his office approached her after certain records from the civil case became public in 2015.
Steele also emphasized that while Constand is the complainant, she is not the party bringing a case against Cosby now.
“This case is not Andrea Constand versus the defendant. This is the commonwealth of Pennsylvania versus the defendant,” he said.
Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas Judge Steven T. O'Neill ruled leading up to trial that some evidence regarding the civil suit and confidential settlement would be admissible.
Also during his opening argument, Steele referenced sexual assault accusations brought against Cosby by other women. O'Neill has allowed the prosecution to call five women other than Constand to testify about their allegations against Cosby.
Steele also showed a photo of pink pills that he said Cosby presented to law enforcement in 2005 when he was interviewed about Constand's allegations. According to Steele, the jury will hear in testimony that Cosby gave Constand three blue pills the night of the alleged assault, not pink ones.
Cosby's defense team is set to make its opening argument Tuesday morning.
Opening arguments were delayed by more than four hours Monday, as the parties and judge handled allegations against one of the selected jurors that he had already made his mind up in the case.
According to a defense memo filed late April 6, a woman who had been summoned for jury selection but ultimately was not chosen called Cosby's lawyers last week to say a selected juror had allegedly said in the jury room that he knew Cosby was guilty.
He said, “'I just think he's guilty, so we can all be done and get out of here,'” according to an affidavit by the prospective juror who contacted Cosby's lawyers.
O'Neill said in court Monday afternoon that he had spoken with the jurors and none of them showed concern about their ability to be fair and impartial. Opening arguments began just before 3:30 p.m.
Cosby is facing three counts of aggravated indecent assault for allegedly sexually assaulting Constand in 2004. His first trial, last year, ended with a hung jury and mistrial. The retrial is expected to last up to a month.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllJefferson Doctor Hit With $6.8M Verdict Over Death of 64-Year-Old Cancer Patient
3 minute readPhila. Med Mal Lawyers In for Busy Year as Court Adjusts for Filing Boom
3 minute readPhila. Jury Hits Sig Sauer With $11M Verdict Over Alleged Gun Defect
3 minute readPhila. Attorney Hit With 5-Year Suspension for Mismanaging Firm and Mishandling Cases
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Litigator of the Week Runners-Up and Shout-Outs: Week of Nov. 24
- 2Justices Appear Leery to Letting Holocaust-Related Claims Against Hungary in U.S. Courts
- 3Judge Rejects New Trial for Tom Girardi, Whose Testimony Was 'Consistent With the Defense Case'
- 4New University of Chicago Law Course Digs Deeper Into Using Gen AI Responsibly
- 5The Defense Bar Is Feeling the Strain: Busy Med Mal Trial Schedules Might Be Phila.'s 'New Normal'
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250