DA: Cosby Paid Accuser Constand $3M in 2006 Settlement
On the first day of Bill Cosby's retrial, jurors learned that Cosby paid more than $3 million in 2006 to keep his accuser, Andrea Constand, from talking about their civil suit over an alleged sexual assault.
April 09, 2018 at 04:49 PM
3 minute read
On the first day of Bill Cosby's retrial, jurors learned that Cosby paid more than $3 million in 2006 to keep his accuser, Andrea Constand, from talking about their civil suit over an alleged sexual assault.
During opening arguments Monday in Norristown, Montgomery County District Attorney Kevin Steele told the jury that Constand sued Cosby in 2005, after learning that law enforcement would not bring charges against him based on her allegations that he drugged and sexually assaulted her.
The civil suit resulted in a settlement of $3.38 million, Steele said, and required that Constand stay quiet about the outcome or underlying facts of the civil case.
Steele also noted that Constand did not approach law enforcement again about her allegations after the settlement. Instead, he said, his office approached her after certain records from the civil case became public in 2015.
Steele also emphasized that while Constand is the complainant, she is not the party bringing a case against Cosby now.
“This case is not Andrea Constand versus the defendant. This is the commonwealth of Pennsylvania versus the defendant,” he said.
Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas Judge Steven T. O'Neill ruled leading up to trial that some evidence regarding the civil suit and confidential settlement would be admissible.
Also during his opening argument, Steele referenced sexual assault accusations brought against Cosby by other women. O'Neill has allowed the prosecution to call five women other than Constand to testify about their allegations against Cosby.
Steele also showed a photo of pink pills that he said Cosby presented to law enforcement in 2005 when he was interviewed about Constand's allegations. According to Steele, the jury will hear in testimony that Cosby gave Constand three blue pills the night of the alleged assault, not pink ones.
Cosby's defense team is set to make its opening argument Tuesday morning.
Opening arguments were delayed by more than four hours Monday, as the parties and judge handled allegations against one of the selected jurors that he had already made his mind up in the case.
According to a defense memo filed late April 6, a woman who had been summoned for jury selection but ultimately was not chosen called Cosby's lawyers last week to say a selected juror had allegedly said in the jury room that he knew Cosby was guilty.
He said, “'I just think he's guilty, so we can all be done and get out of here,'” according to an affidavit by the prospective juror who contacted Cosby's lawyers.
O'Neill said in court Monday afternoon that he had spoken with the jurors and none of them showed concern about their ability to be fair and impartial. Opening arguments began just before 3:30 p.m.
Cosby is facing three counts of aggravated indecent assault for allegedly sexually assaulting Constand in 2004. His first trial, last year, ended with a hung jury and mistrial. The retrial is expected to last up to a month.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllKline & Specter and Bosworth Resolve Post-Settlement Fighting Ahead of Courtroom Showdown
6 minute read'Discordant Dots': Why Phila. Zantac Judge Rejected Bid for His Recusal
3 minute readPhila. Court System Pushed to Adapt as Justices Greenlight Changes to Pa.'s Civil Jury Selection Rules
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1US DOJ Threatens to Prosecute Local Officials Who Don't Aid Immigration Enforcement
- 2Kirkland Is Entering a New Market. Will Its Rates Get a Warm Welcome?
- 3African Law Firm Investigated Over ‘AI-Generated’ Case References
- 4Gen AI and Associate Legal Writing: Davis Wright Tremaine's New Training Model
- 5Departing Attorneys Sue Their Former Law Firm
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250