DA: Cosby Paid Accuser Constand $3M in 2006 Settlement
On the first day of Bill Cosby's retrial, jurors learned that Cosby paid more than $3 million in 2006 to keep his accuser, Andrea Constand, from talking about their civil suit over an alleged sexual assault.
April 09, 2018 at 04:49 PM
3 minute read
Andrea Constand.
On the first day of Bill Cosby's retrial, jurors learned that Cosby paid more than $3 million in 2006 to keep his accuser, Andrea Constand, from talking about their civil suit over an alleged sexual assault.
During opening arguments Monday in Norristown, Montgomery County District Attorney Kevin Steele told the jury that Constand sued Cosby in 2005, after learning that law enforcement would not bring charges against him based on her allegations that he drugged and sexually assaulted her.
The civil suit resulted in a settlement of $3.38 million, Steele said, and required that Constand stay quiet about the outcome or underlying facts of the civil case.
Steele also noted that Constand did not approach law enforcement again about her allegations after the settlement. Instead, he said, his office approached her after certain records from the civil case became public in 2015.
Steele also emphasized that while Constand is the complainant, she is not the party bringing a case against Cosby now.
“This case is not Andrea Constand versus the defendant. This is the commonwealth of Pennsylvania versus the defendant,” he said.
Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas Judge Steven T. O'Neill ruled leading up to trial that some evidence regarding the civil suit and confidential settlement would be admissible.
Also during his opening argument, Steele referenced sexual assault accusations brought against Cosby by other women. O'Neill has allowed the prosecution to call five women other than Constand to testify about their allegations against Cosby.
Steele also showed a photo of pink pills that he said Cosby presented to law enforcement in 2005 when he was interviewed about Constand's allegations. According to Steele, the jury will hear in testimony that Cosby gave Constand three blue pills the night of the alleged assault, not pink ones.
Cosby's defense team is set to make its opening argument Tuesday morning.
Opening arguments were delayed by more than four hours Monday, as the parties and judge handled allegations against one of the selected jurors that he had already made his mind up in the case.
According to a defense memo filed late April 6, a woman who had been summoned for jury selection but ultimately was not chosen called Cosby's lawyers last week to say a selected juror had allegedly said in the jury room that he knew Cosby was guilty.
He said, “'I just think he's guilty, so we can all be done and get out of here,'” according to an affidavit by the prospective juror who contacted Cosby's lawyers.
O'Neill said in court Monday afternoon that he had spoken with the jurors and none of them showed concern about their ability to be fair and impartial. Opening arguments began just before 3:30 p.m.
Cosby is facing three counts of aggravated indecent assault for allegedly sexually assaulting Constand in 2004. His first trial, last year, ended with a hung jury and mistrial. The retrial is expected to last up to a month.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPa. Bill Would Raise State Damages Cap, but Plaintiffs Attorneys Are Not On Board
6 minute readPhila., Del. Firms Handling UArts' Ch. 7 Petition Fall Far Below Top Bankruptcy Rates
3 minute readAttorneys Ordered to Apologize to South Philadelphia Residents Following 'Scream Test' Experiment
5 minute readChild Welfare Agency, Hotel Agree to $9.4M Settlement With Trafficking Victim
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1The Law Firm Disrupted: Playing the Talent Game to Win
- 2GlaxoSmithKline Settles Most Zantac Lawsuits for $2.2B
- 3BD Settles Thousands of Bard Hernia Mesh Lawsuits
- 4Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
- 5Inside Track: Late-Career In-House Leaders Offer Words to Live by
Who Got The Work
Eleanor M. Lackman of Mitchell Silberberg & Knupp has entered an appearance for Canon, the Japanese camera maker, and the Brooklyn Nets in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The case, filed Sept. 16 in California Central District Court by T-Rex Law on behalf of technology company Phinge Corporation, pursues claims against the defendants for their ongoing use of the 'Netaverse' mark. The suit contends that the defendants' use of the mark in connection with a virtual reality platform will likely create consumer confusion. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Consuelo B. Marshall, is 2:24-cv-07917, Phinge Corporation v. Yankees Entertainment and Sports Network, LLC et al.
Who Got The Work
Fox Rothschild partner Glenn S. Grindlinger has entered an appearance for Garage Management Company in a pending lawsuit over alleged wage-and-hour violations. The case was filed Aug. 31 in New York Southern District Court by the Abdul Hassan Law Group on behalf of a manual worker who contends that he was not properly compensated for overtime hours worked. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Analisa Torres, is 1:24-cv-06610, Bailey v. Garage Management Company LLC.
Who Got The Work
Veronica M. Keithley of Stoel Rives has entered an appearance for Husky Terminal and Stevedoring LLC in a pending environmental lawsuit. The suit, filed Aug. 12 in Washington Western District Court by Kampmeier & Knutsen on behalf of Communities for a Healthy Bay, seeks to declare that the defendant has violated the Clean Water Act by releasing stormwater discharges on Puget Sound and Commencement Bay. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Benjamin H. Settle, is 3:24-cv-05662, Communities for a Healthy Bay v. Husky Terminal and Stevedoring LLC.
Who Got The Work
Caroline Pignatelli of Cooley has entered an appearance for law firm Cooley, partner Matt Hallinan, retired partner Michael Tu and a pair of Cooley associates in a pending fraud lawsuit related to the firm's representation of startup company Carbon IQ and founder Benjamin Cantey. The case, filed Sept. 26 in New Jersey District Court by the DalCortivo Law Offices on behalf of Gould Ventures and member Jason Gould, contends that the defendants deliberately or recklessly concealed critical information from the plaintiffs regarding fraud allegations against Cantey. Gould claims that he would not have accepted a position on Carbon IQ's board of directors or made a 2022 investment in the company if the fraud allegations had been disclosed. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Robert Kirsch, is 3:24-cv-09485, Gould Ventures, LLC et al v. Cooley, LLP et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom have stepped in to represent PDD Holdings, the operator of online marketplaces Pinduoduo and Temu, in a pending securities class action. The case, filed Sept. 30 in New York Eastern District Court by Labaton Keller Sucharow and VanOverbeke, Michaud & Timmony, contends that the defendants concealed information that rendered the growth of PDD unsustainable and posed substantial risks to PDD’s business, including merchant policies that made it unprofitable for vendors to do business on PDD platforms; malware issues on PDD applications; and PDD’s failure to implement effective compliance systems. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Pamela K. Chen, is 1:24-cv-06881, Macomb County Retiree Health Care Fund v. Pdd Holdings Inc. et al.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250