NFL Accuses Lawyers, Doctors of 'Widespread Fraud' on Concussion Settlement
The NFL has asked a Pennsylvania federal judge to appoint a special investigator to look into alleged "widespread fraud" that is "infecting" the $1 billion concussion litigation settlement.
April 16, 2018 at 01:38 PM
3 minute read
Photo: Shutterstock.com
The NFL has asked a Pennsylvania federal judge to appoint a special investigator to look into alleged “widespread fraud” that is “infecting” the $1 billion concussion litigation settlement.
The National Football League on April 13 filed a motion asking U.S. District Judge Anita Brody of the Eastern District of Pennsylvania to appoint a special investigator to look into allegations that some law firms are coaching retired players to obtain more favorable scores in the claims assessment process, and some doctors are failing to properly evaluate the claimants.
The filing comes as many lawyers are contending that the NFL and the claims administrator, BrownGreer, are improperly delaying the proceedings that are expected to compensate 20,000 former NFL players suffering concussion-related injuries.
According to the NFL's motion, which was filed by Brad Karp, of Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison, about 46 percent of all the claims submitted under the settlement agreement have been audited because of “red flags” indicating potential fraud. The motion also said there is evidence a firm representing more than 100 retired players coached claimants and told at least one player to show up for his evaluation “hungover and on Valium.” Another firm, representing 50 ex-players, charged players more if they obtained an Alzheimer's diagnosis, and had its clients evaluated by a pediatric neurologist, the filing said.
Although the filing did not name any specific firm as being involved in the alleged fraud, the filing said that, “Ironically, some of the lawyers who are complaining most vociferously and publicly about the slow pace of claims administration are themselves associated with the submission of questionable claims and the true cause of the delay.”
“The pervasive fraud by doctors, lawyers and certain players cannot be allowed to continue,” the NFL said in the filing.
Seeger Weiss attorney Chris Seeger, who, in his role as co-lead class counsel in the litigation, is charged with overseeing the implementation of the settlement on behalf of the broad class of retired NFL players, said in an emailed statement that he agrees with the NFL that a special investigator should be appointed, and that he previously raised concerns about potentially fraudulent claims. However, he added that he did not want the NFL to use the “small number” of problematic claims to deny payment in legitimate cases.
“Unlike other NFL benefits programs, this settlement is overseen by the court, and the league cannot escape its responsibility,” Seeger said in the statement. “We will make sure that former NFL players and their families receive every benefit they are entitled to under this agreement.”
The NFL said the special investigator would supplement the claims administrator and special masters already involved in the case, as those two parties are limited in their ability to investigate potential fraud. The investigator, according to the NFL's request, should also have the ability to communicate ex parte with the court, claims administrator, co-lead class counsel and the NFL's attorneys.
The request also cited a decision by the special master late last year, which disqualified a doctor who allegedly misrepresented information involving 153 claims. That ruling said the doctor had claimed to have spent 139 hours evaluating and preparing reports for retired players during a 24-hour window.
Karp did not return a call for comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPhila. Med Mal Lawyers In for Busy Year as Court Adjusts for Filing Boom
3 minute read'Recover, Reflect, Retool and Retry': Lessons From Women Atop Pa. Legal Community
3 minute readEDPA's New Chief Judge Plans to Advance Efforts to Combat Threats to Judiciary
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250