Judge Orders Pa. Company to Honor $4M Pledge to Bible College
After failing to meet a filing deadline in a federal breach of contract case, a Pennsylvania company has been ordered to honor its $4 million pledge to a West Virginia Bible college.
April 18, 2018 at 05:01 PM
4 minute read
After failing to meet a filing deadline in a federal breach of contract case, a Pennsylvania company has been ordered to honor its $4 million pledge to a West Virginia Bible college.
U.S. District Judge John E. Jones III of the Middle District of Pennsylvania granted summary judgment in favor of the Appalachian Bible College and ordered defendant Foremost Industries to make the donation it promised in a gift agreement with the school.
Foremost agreed to make five payments of $800,000 to the school, but failed to do so by the time the first two payments were due. The school, referred to as ABC by the court, filed a breach of contract lawsuit in 2016.
The now-shuttered Greencastle-based company—which was bought out by GLD Foremost Holdings—removed the case to Pennsylvania federal court, where ABC filed an amended complaint including a claim of anticipatory breach of contract. The court imposed filing deadlines for motions, but was concerned that Foremost was trying to stymie the litigation.
“On March 16, 2018, the court ordered Foremost Industries to file an opposition brief no later than April 16, 2018, due to concerns that Foremost Industries was engaging in dilatory tactics by repeatedly seeking leave to obtain new counsel,” Jones wrote in his opinion. “Despite the clear language of our order, and our warning that failure to file an opposition brief would result in our considering the motion as unopposed, Foremost Industries has not filed its brief in time.”
To prove anticipatory breach of contract, a plaintiff must show that the breaching party has displayed “an absolute and unequivocal refusal to perform or a distinct and positive statement of an inability to do so,” according to the 2010 Commonwealth Court ruling in Boro Construction v. Ridley School District.
That is in addition to the standard breach of contract factors, which include demonstrating “(1) the existence of a contract, including its essential terms, (2) a breach of the contract; and, (3) resulting damages,” according to the 2016 state Supreme Court case Meyer, Darragh, Buckler, Bebenek & Eck v. Law Firm of Malone Middleman.
“The existence of the gift agreement in this case is undisputed. The gift agreement contains all the essential terms and indicates the parties' intent to be legally bound and to legally bind successor entities,” Jones said, satisfying the first element.
“The second element requires a breach of a duty imposed by the contract. In this case, the contract imposed a duty on Foremost Industries to pay $800,000 per year from April 1, 2016, through April 1, 2020. In its answer, Foremost Industries admits that it did not pay ABC the $800,000 due on April 1, 2016, and that it did not intend to make any future payments to ABC under the gift agreement,” Jones said. “Thus, according to Foremost Industries' own admissions, the second element has been satisfied. The final element, resultant damages, is also easily satisfied. By the plain terms of the gift agreement, Foremost Industries was obligated to pay ABC $800,000 per year beginning April 1, 2016, and continuing for five years,” which it did not.
“ABC has not seen a single penny of that pledge, which Foremost Industries freely admits,” Jones said.
According to the docket, Foremost is not currently represented by counsel. Jeffrey T. McGuire of Pion, Nerone, Girman, Winslow & Smith in Harrisburg represented Foremost most recently and did not respond to a request for comment.
ABC is represented by James R. Hartline of Davies, McFarland & Carroll in Pittsburgh and did not respond to a request for comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMiddle District of Pennsylvania's U.S. Attorney Announces Resignation
2 minute readHigh Court Revives Kleinbard's Bid to Collect $70K in Legal Fees From Lancaster DA
4 minute readImmunity for Mental Health Care and Coverage for CBD: What's on the Pa. High Court's November Calendar
5 minute readSlip-and-Fall Suit Cleared to Proceed Against Kalahari Indoor Waterpark
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1'A Death Sentence for TikTok'?: Litigators and Experts Weigh Impact of Potential Ban on Creators and Data Privacy
- 2Bribery Case Against Former Lt. Gov. Brian Benjamin Is Dropped
- 3‘Extremely Disturbing’: AI Firms Face Class Action by ‘Taskers’ Exposed to Traumatic Content
- 4State Appeals Court Revives BraunHagey Lawsuit Alleging $4.2M Unlawful Wire to China
- 5Invoking Trump, AG Bonta Reminds Lawyers of Duties to Noncitizens in Plea Dealing
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250