Fox Rothschild Grows Revenue 8 Percent, PPP Up 1.7 Percent
Managing partner Mark Morris said the firm had a strong 2017.
April 20, 2018 at 06:19 PM
5 minute read
Fox Rothschild was able to grow its profits slightly in 2017, despite an increase in expenses, thanks to strong revenue growth for the year.
The firm grew revenue by 8.1 percent, to $450 million, in what firmwide managing partner Mark Morris said was a strong fiscal year that ended March 31. Revenue per lawyer increased by 1.3 percent, to $605,000.
Profits per equity partner were up 1.7 percent, reaching $675,000, while net income increased by 3.8 percent.
Morris said the firm measures its success more by the average compensation for all partners, which was $569,000, an increase of 3.6 percent from fiscal 2016.
(The firm's final financial results don't necessarily match estimates reported in the May issue of Legal affiliate The American Lawyer, which collects its data before Fox Rothschild's year-end.)
Head count grew by 6.7 percent, or 47 lawyers, reaching 744. Many of those additions were nonpartners, as the equity partner tier grew by four, to 191, and the nonequity tier by five, to 110.
Early in its fiscal year the firm gained a foothold in the Pacific Northwest, absorbing Seattle-based Riddell Williams, a 39-lawyer firm with corporate, employment, financial services, litigation and real estate practices.
Aside from that deal, the firm spent much of its energy in 2017 on catching up with its growth from recent years.
Fox Rothschild completed its largest-ever merger in January 2016, acquiring 82-lawyer Oppenheimer Wolff & Donnelly in Minneapolis. It then hired five other partners in Minneapolis and recruited a six-lawyer entertainment team in the Twin Cities and New York. Fox Rothschild's New York office also brought on a three-lawyer intellectual property group from Kenyon & Kenyon in 2016 and a six-lawyer startup group from Dentons in March 2017.
Last year the firm gained new office space in West Palm Beach, Florida, and Los Angeles, and expanded its office in New York. The firm also launched industry initiatives in data privacy and security, gaming, emerging companies and medical technology and devices, Morris said, which required some investment.
“We really made headway in sort of completing our integration and getting a handle on the operational aspects of our firm that looks a lot different than it did five years ago,” Morris said. It was helpful that the firm met budget on revenue, he said, adding that the firm also exceeded budget slightly in terms of partner distributions.
Morris said the firm raised standard rates modestly, but also saw an uptick in the utilization of alternative fee arrangements.
“The firm doesn't take all of the risk … it's a sharing of the risk,” he said. “Our CFO and our COO are actively involved in project management. We also involve the department chairs where necessary.”
The firm's strongest practices were intellectual property, tax controversy, entertainment and cybersecurity, Morris said, but no individual matters accounted for their performance. Cybersecurity, in particular, is a growth area, he said, as businesses seek assistance on compliance issues.
Meanwhile, he said, bankruptcy was slower, in keeping with industrywide trends. And general commercial litigation was down a little bit, he said, likely because the economy is doing well and parties are less likely to go to trial.
|National Stage
Morris said he expects the firm to continue growing, especially in the locations where it already has lawyers. That doesn't mean the firm won't expand into new markets, he said, but it will approach those decisions opportunistically.
“We think we have an investment now in the infrastructure,” he said. “The way to yield the return on that investment is to add to the offices we have.”
He said the firm is always in dialogues with groups about potential combinations, and has spoken to two or three smaller firms recently, but no mergers are imminent.
Morris said he also wants to continue improving internal operations and finding ways to be more efficient. The firm will also look for ways to manage its costs in lower-rate practices, he said, but has no plans to abandon work in those areas.
Fox Rothschild remains a firm for middle-market clients, but its competition has changed somewhat, Morris said.
“I wouldn't say our competition is all the firms in Philadelphia,” he said. “That's where it's changed … now our competition are national firms that have similar clientele.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLinklaters Duo Jumps to Reed Smith's Structured Finance Practice
Big Law Expected To Follow Milbank's Lead With Associate Year-End Bonuses
Are Lead Attorney Relationships More Important Now Than Law Firm Brands?
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1As 'Red Hot' 2024 for Legal Industry Comes to Close, Leaders Reflect and Share Expectations for Next Year
- 2Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 3Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 4Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 5Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250