After Broadside, Parties Argued Over Traffic Lights, Right of Way
On Feb. 4, 2013, plaintiff Ryan Mahaffey, 29, a production assistant, was driving north in the left lane on York Road/Route 263 toward Bristol Road, in Warminster.
April 26, 2018 at 02:00 PM
5 minute read
Mahaffey v. Havers
$306,000
Date of Verdict: March 29
Court and Case No.: C.P. Bucks County, No. 2013-08117
Judge: Robert J. Mellon
Type of Action: Insurance-subrogation, motor vehichle
Injuries: Leg, back injuries
Plaintiffs Counsel: Anthony D. Damiano, Law Offices of Anthony D. Damiano, West Chester; Amy Sokolson, Hoffman, Sternberg & Karpf, Southampton.
Plaintiffs Experts: Dr. Gene Salkind, neurosurgery; Huntingdon Valley; Douglas Kimmel, family medicine, Feasterville-Trevose.
Defense Counsel: Richard C. Howard Jr., Weber Kracht & Chellew, Perkasie; Geoffrey S. Peterson, Bennett, Bricklin & Saltzburg, Blue Bell.
Defense Experts: Marc Manzione, orthopedic surgery; Huntingdon Valley.
Comment:
On Feb. 4, 2013, plaintiff Ryan Mahaffey, 29, a production assistant, was driving north in the left lane on York Road/Route 263 toward Bristol Road, in Warminster. He asserted that he had entered the intersection on a yellow light when a sport u tility vehicle approached from the opposite direction. The SUV driver attempted to turn left, and in doing so, the front of the SUV struck the front driver's side of Mahaffey's sedan. Mahaffey claimed back injuries.
Mahaffey sued the driver, Roseann Havers, alleging negligence. He also sued the owner of her SUV, Christopher S. Havers Construction Inc. The company's insurer, plaintiff Erie Insurance Exchange, paid $16,200 for the damage to the sport utility vehicle.
In a separate matter which was later consolidated, Erie, as a subrogee, sued Mahaffey for recovery of the $16,200.
At trial, Mahaffey recounted how he had entered the intersection on a yellow light. A witness, who had been stopped at a red light on Bristol Road, heard the collision between Mahaffey and Havers' vehicles and testified that her light was still red when the collision occurred; a second or two after, her light turned green.
Counsel for Mahaffey, both as a plaintiff and as a defendant, maintained that the witnesses' testimoney indicated that Mahaffey had entered the intersection on a yellow light, not a red light, and that Havers improperly turned in front of Mahaffey, who had the right-of-way.
Havers confirmed that she had entered the intersection on a yellow light, but assumed that, because the light was yellow, Mahaffey would have stopped, and so she attempted to make her left turn, at which point the accident occurred. Havers' counsel maintained that Mahaffey should have seen Havers in the process of turning and therefore should have allowed her to turn before entering the intersection, and thereby avoid a collision.
Havers cited the testimony of a witness. The witness, who had been traveling behind Mahaffey in the right northbound lane, stated that the light was either a late yellow or it had just turned red as Mahaffey entered the intersection.
Mahaffey was taken by ambulance to an emergency room, where he was examined and released. Within a day or so, he followed up with his primary care physician, who put him on a course of physical therapy. For approximately 10 months, Mahaffey treated with physical therapy, including massage and exercise. An MRI showed a herniation at lumbar intervertebral disc L4-5. An EMG was negative. A nerve conduction velocity test was positive for right-sided radiculopathy stemming from disc L4-5. Mahaffey alleged numbness and tingling throughout his right leg. He was also diagnosed with headaches and strains and sprains to his neck and left non-dominant wrist; these injuries later resolved.
Throughout 2013 and 2014, Mahaffey saw a number of physicians, including a pain-management specialist, who administered two epidural injections of a steroid-based painkiller. The injections initially proved successful, as Mahaffey stopped treating for the next two years. In 2016, Mahaffey returned to his doctor for one visit with continued complaints of low-back pain and right-leg pain and numbness. In 2017, however, with his symptoms having worsened, he received two more epidural injections for pain to his lumbar spine. In 2018, he underwent three facet-block injections under anesthesia, which resolved the numbness and tingling in his right leg and reduced the pain in his low back. He sought to recover a stipulated amount of $6,000 in medical costs.
Mahaffey's primary care physician and expert in neurosurgery causally related his injuries and treatment to the accident. The expert recommended a future rhizotomy, estimated at $3,500.
Mahaffey, who was in his mid-30s at the time of trial, testified that his injuries made him feel old. He had never anticipated that he would be restricted in his activities when he was relatively young. This includes difficulty keeping up with his young son and physically interacting with him. His wife testified that Mahaffey was an athlete who had regularly played football, went to the gym and enjoyed hip-hop dancing.
Following the accident, Mahaffey could barely pick up a full laundry basket, she said. Mahaffey sought damages for past and future pain and suffering.
Havers' expert in orthopedic surgery, who examined Mahaffey, acknowledged that his herniation was acute, but it was small in nature. According to the expert, the epidural injections that Mahaffey had received were reasonable and necessary, but the facet-block injections were not.
The jury found Havers 85 percent liable and Mahaffey 15 percent liable. Mahaffey was determined to receive $306,000, which was accordingly reduced to $260,100. Since the jury found Havers more than 50 percent liable, Erie could not recover on its claim against Mahaffey. The trial lasted three days.
This report is based on information that was provided by counsel for Mahaffey as plaintiff and as a defendant. Counsel for Havers, Christopher S. Havers Construction and Erie Insurance Exchange did not respond to calls for comment.
—This report first appeared in VerdictSearch, an ALM publication.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFederal Judge Allows Elderly Woman's Consumer Protection Suit to Proceed Against Citizens Bank
5 minute readJudge Leaves Statute of Limitations Question in Injury Crash Suit for a Jury
4 minute readSupreme Court's Ruling in 'Students for Fair Admissions' and Its Impact on DEI Initiatives in the Workplace
6 minute readMembership Has Its Privileges: Bankruptcy Court Examines LLC's Authority to File Bankruptcy
8 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250