Attorney Sanctioned Nearly $5K After 'Honest Mistake' Turned to Bad Faith
The attorney was sanctioned for not dropping the case as soon as she learned her client was not eligible under the Family and Medical Leave Act.
April 27, 2018 at 05:27 PM
3 minute read
Failing to recognize that her client wasn't eligible under the Family and Medical Leave Act may have been an “honest mistake,” but not dropping the case as soon as the mistake was discovered has cost a Pittsburgh attorney nearly $5,000 in sanctions.
U.S. District Judge Cathy Bissoon of the Western District of Pennsylvania recently ordered Kraemer, Manes & Associates attorney Christi Wallace to pay $4,900 in attorney fees to compensate defendants for having to pursue the FMLA claim Wallace filed on behalf of plaintiff Christopher Deming-Archambault.
Although Wallace contended that failing to realize her client was a few weeks shy of meeting the 12-month employment requirement to be eligible for FMLA protections was “an honest mistake,” Bissoon said failing to notify the court and allowing the case to continue for more than a month constituted bad faith.
“Plaintiff's counsel failed to examine her client's FMLA eligibility at the time she filed the complaint—even to a cursory degree—and then failed to take timely action on the docket once it was clear to her that her claim was legally invalid,” Bissoon said. “This must constitute bad faith, and the court will invoke its inherent authority to sanction plaintiff's counsel for this conduct.”
The decision in Deming-Archambault v. Lennox International was issued April 20.
According to Bissoon, Deming-Archambault sued his former employer, Lennox International, in December 2017, claiming the company retaliated against him for taking leave by putting him on a performance improvement plan and downgrading his sales territory, which “set him up to fail” and triggered his decision to quit the job. According to the complaint, Deming-Archambault started working at Lennox International in January 2016, and took leave in December of that year.
On Feb. 20, 2018, the company filed an answer saying that Deming-Archambault was not an eligible employee under the FMLA because he had not been employed for at least 12 months before taking leave.
The court set a deadline to respond in mid-March, but Wallace did not meet the deadline, and instead notified a court deputy clerk a few days later that she planned to ask the court to grant the defendant's motion's for judgment on the pleadings.
In late March, the defendants filed the sanctions motion, saying that, instead of withdrawing the claims, Deming-Archambault's counsel acted in bad faith by “coercively threatening and then pursuing other meritless claims.”
Wallace denied those claims, saying she simply made a mistake and had been preparing to file a stipulation of dismissal. She further argued that it was defense counsel who attempted “to coerce” a settlement in the case.
Bissoon said Wallace did not notify the court about the plans to dismiss, or amend the case until April 6, which left Bissoon to conclude that “counsel's conduct amounted to stalling the litigation for an improper reason.”
“To be clear, counsel's initial failure to calculate whether her client had worked for 12 months was reckless, and recklessness alone is insufficient for a finding of bad faith,” Bissoon said. “However, counsel compounded her reckless mistake through her subsequent conduct.”
Bissoon's sanctions award is significantly lower than the $21,462 that defense counsel requested.
Neither Wallace, nor Jones Day attorney James Urban, who is representing Lennox, returned a call for comment Friday.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPhiladelphia Bar Association Executive Director Announces Retirement
3 minute readPhila. Jury Hits Sig Sauer With $11M Verdict Over Alleged Gun Defect
3 minute readPhila. Attorney Hit With 5-Year Suspension for Mismanaging Firm and Mishandling Cases
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1$2.7M Verdict for Whistleblower Exposes Employer to $300M Claim
- 2Phila. Med Mal Lawyers In for Busy Year as Court Adjusts for Filing Boom
- 3Bonus Parade Continues, With Additional Firms Matching Milbank
- 4Contract Software Unicorn Ironclad Hires Former Pinterest Lawyer as GC
- 5European, US Litigation Funding Experts Look for Commonalities at NYU Event
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250