Philadelphia Jury Hands Defense Win in Trial Over Xarelto
The jury rendered its verdict Friday morning, after more than two weeks of trial and about two days of deliberation.
April 27, 2018 at 12:27 PM
4 minute read
Photo: Shutterstock.com
A Philadelphia jury has handed up a defense verdict in favor of Bayer and Janssen Pharmaceuticals, finding that the label on the blood thinner Xarelto adequately warned patients about the danger of severe bleeds.
The jury, deliberating in the second Xarelto trial to come before a Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas jury, rendered its verdict Friday morning, after more than two weeks of trial and about two days of deliberation.
Attorneys for plaintiff Daniel Russell had argued that the company failed to warn doctors and the medical community about the risks of taking Xarelto, especially in conjunction with other anticoagulant medication, but the jury answered only the first question on the verdict sheet, finding that the medication's label was adequate.
The jury handed up the fourth defense verdict in Xarelto litigation in state and federal courts. A $28 million plaintiff's verdict from a Philadelphia state court jury earlier this year was set aside by the trial judge.
In statements Friday morning, the companies said the wins highlight the safety of the drug and adequacy of the warning label.
“Bayer and Janssen have had successful outcomes for all five cases that have gone to trial, and the defense verdict in this trial underscores again the safety and efficacy of this life-saving medicine, and the accuracy of Xarelto's science-based, FDA-approved label,” Bayer spokeswoman Carolyn Nagle said. “Plaintiffs' attorneys in these cases have presented multiple theories regarding the alleged inadequacy of the Xarelto label, and all of their claims ultimately have been rejected under applicable laws.”
Janssen spokeswoman Sarah Freeman said, “The jury's decision reflects the appropriateness of the FDA-approved labeling for Xarelto.”
“At Janssen, nothing is more important to us than the health and safety of the patients who use our medicines,” Freeman said. “We stand behind the safety and efficacy of Xarelto and will continue to defend against the allegations made in this litigation.”
Plaintiffs' liaison counsel, Michael Weinkowitz of Levin Sedran & Berman, said the plaintiffs plan to appeal.
The trial team for the defense was Washington-based Wilkinson Walsh + Eskovitz attorney Brian Stekloff, Sheila Boston of Arnold & Porter in New York and Tarek Ismail of Goldman Ismail Tomaselli Brennan & Baum in Chicago. Levin Papantonio Thomas Mitchell Rafferty & Proctor attorney Brian Barr, who is based in Pensacola, Florida, and Laura Feldman of Feldman & Pinto in Philadelphia represented the plaintiff.
According to the plaintiff's counsel, the Russell case was chosen for trial by the defendants.
Russell is the second Xarelto case to be tried in Philadelphia state court, and the first to focus on the defendants' alleged failure to warn about the dangers of taking Xarelto when patients are also treating with a dual antiplatelet therapy. About 25 percent of the more than 1,500 Xarelto cases pending in Philadelphia's mass tort program involve plaintiffs who took Xarelto in conjunction with Aspirin and Plavix.
During the plaintiff's 75-minute presentation, Barr argued that the drug companies put profits over patients, and said if Janssen was the Cleveland Cavaliers, then Xarelto, which was a blockbuster medication, was the company's LeBron James.
“The team fails without him,” Barr told the jury. “The marketing department needed to protect the franchise.”
Stekloff, however, outlined the numerous health problems Russell had suffered, and told jurors that Russell's treating physicians were fully aware of the risks of the drug when they decided that its benefits outweighed the risks, given the medical complications Russell was facing.
“It shows that he was a difficult patient to manage. His history of medical conditions put his heart in a bad place,” Stekloff said. “The label says it can cause serious or fatal bleeding. There is no greater warning that you can have.”
The next Xarelto trial to be held in Philadelphia is set to start June 11.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Recover, Reflect, Retool and Retry': Lessons From Women Atop Pa. Legal Community
3 minute readEDPA's New Chief Judge Plans to Advance Efforts to Combat Threats to Judiciary
3 minute readPa. Superior Court's Next Leader Looks Ahead to Looming Challenges in Coming Years
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Trying a Case for Abu Ghraib Detainees Two Decades After Abuse
- 2The Distribution of Dangerous Products Via Online Marketplaces
- 3The Products Liability Case Against Tianeptine: The Deadly ‘Dietary Supplement’ Found at Your Local Store
- 4The Evolving Landscape of Joint and Several Liability in Pa.: A Post-'Spencer' Analysis
- 5A Deep Dive Into the Product-Line Exception in Pennsylvania
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250