Morgan & Morgan, Sued Over Lack of Pa. Presence, Hires Lawyer in Philadelphia
Facing a false advertising lawsuit from a competitor involving claims that it has no significant presence in Pennsylvania, Orlando-based personal injury law firm Morgan & Morgan has hired a lawyer to handle cases in Philadelphia.
May 03, 2018 at 04:54 PM
3 minute read
Facing a false advertising lawsuit from a competitor involving claims that it has no significant presence in Pennsylvania, Orlando-based personal injury law firm Morgan & Morgan has hired a lawyer to handle cases in Philadelphia.
The firm hired Kevin Clancy Boylan as the managing attorney of its one-person Philadelphia office. Boylan, who was admitted to the bar in 2012, formerly worked at the truck accident injury firm of Fellerman & Ciarimboli, located in Kingston.
A Morgan & Morgan spokesperson said Tuesday, “The hire is part of Morgan's growth plan for Philadelphia,” in response to the question of whether Boylan's hiring had anything to do with Philadelphia injury lawyer Jeffrey Rosenbaum's lawsuit against the firm, alleging Morgan & Morgan falsely advertises that it has a substantial Pennsylvania practice.
“I'm proud to have an attorney like Clancy in our Philadelphia office,” Morgan & Morgan founder John Morgan said in a statement released Tuesday. “He's had a legal career filled with millions of dollars' worth of courtroom victories that have helped change people's lives.”
Boylan is a graduate of the Duquesne University School of Law and Saint Joseph's University, and in addition to his practice, serves as an attorney adviser to Drexel University's trial advocacy program. He could not be reached for comment.
Recently, U.S. District Judge Mark Kearney of the Eastern District of Pennsylvania denied the Morgan firm's motion to dismiss Rosenbaum's claim that his firm lost money allegedly because the Morgan firm falsely portrayed itself as having a presence in Pennsylvania when, prior to Boylan joining, it had only one licensed attorney in-state.
“In essence, Morgan & Morgan and the individuals are asking us to examine each statement in a vacuum and strike Rosenbaum's allegations about certain statements because those statements are not misleading in isolation,” Kearney said in his opinion. “We decline this exercise at the motion to dismiss stage because it is not clear from Rosenbaum's allegations whether certain statements also appear in an advertisement with the allegedly misleading disclaimer.”
Rosenbaum also sought an injunction requiring Morgan & Morgan to pull its ads off television for the duration of the case, though he later withdrew that filing.
Previously, Kearney denied Morgan & Morgan's motion to dismiss the false advertising claims, allowing them to move forward against the Morgan firm, John Morgan, and attorney Scott Weinstein in relation to several statements made in commercials: “I'm your lawyer”; “We're all here for you” and “Our family is here for your family”; “You don't pay us unless we're successful”; and that the firm is “not a referral service.”
The judge said Rosenbaum has made plausible claims that the statements could mislead prospective clients in Pennsylvania into thinking that the Orlando-based firm and its lawyers—only one of which is licensed to practice in Pennsylvania—will get individual attention from members of the Morgan family.
Kearney dismissed claims related to Morgan & Morgan's billboard and internet advertising.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllJefferson Doctor Hit With $6.8M Verdict Over Death of 64-Year-Old Cancer Patient
3 minute readPhila. Med Mal Lawyers In for Busy Year as Court Adjusts for Filing Boom
3 minute readPhila. Jury Hits Sig Sauer With $11M Verdict Over Alleged Gun Defect
3 minute readPhila. Attorney Hit With 5-Year Suspension for Mismanaging Firm and Mishandling Cases
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Court rejects request to sideline San Jose State volleyball player on grounds she’s transgender
- 2Trump and Latin America: Lawyers Brace for US's Hardline Approach to Region
- 3Weil Advances 18 to Partner, Largest Class Since 2021
- 4People and Purpose: AbbVie's GC on Leading With Impact and Inspiring Change
- 5Beef Between Two South Florida Law Firms Deepens With Suit Over Defamation
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250