Editor’s note: This is the second in a two-part series.

In last week’s article, I discussed the Sedona Conference and the “Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 34(b)(2) Primer: Practice Pointers for Responding to Discovery Requests,” 19 Sedona Conf. J. 447. The publication was the conference’s final version of its Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 34(b)(2) primer, a project of The Working Group on Electronic Document Retention and Production (WG1). In this week’s article, I continue to look at some of the primer’s takes on discovery requests and responses to see the primer’s strengths and weaknesses.

  • Responses to requests for productions.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]