Meek Mill Lawyers Call on Court Leaders to Remove Brinkley From Case
The motion said Judge Genece Brinkley was disqualified from handling Meek Mill's case, and that the rapper is not being treated the same as other defendants.
May 07, 2018 at 03:32 PM
3 minute read
Meek Mill. Photo: Randy Miramontez/Shutterstock.com
After recently being released on bail, hip-hop star Meek Mill has asked the head of the First Judicial District's criminal court to appoint a new judge to handle his case.
Mill, who was released late last month after spending roughly five months in jail for violating his parole, filed a motion May 4 asking Judge Leon Tucker, the supervising judge of Philadelphia's criminal division, to administratively transfer or reassign Judge Genece Brinkley from his case. Brinkley, who handled Mill's 2008 trial and subsequent probation, has denied multiple previous requests that she step down from the case.
The motion, filed May 4 by Ardmore attorney Peter Goldberger, said Brinkley was disqualified from handling Mill's case, and that the rapper, whose real name is Robert Williams, is not being treated the same as other defendants.
“Judge Brinkley's conduct has disqualified her within the meaning of Pa.R.Crim.P. 903(D) from further presiding over this matter,” Williams said in the filing. “This court's intervention, in its administrative capacity, is therefore needed to reassign the PCRA proceedings concerning Mr. Williams, including the supervision of his bail, to a different judge of this court, such as the president judge.”
The filing focused on how the court has handled the numerous post-conviction appeals in cases that were based on the testimony of Philadelphia Police Officer Reginald Graham. Graham was the only witness who testified at Williams' nonjury trial, but two officers from his unit recently provided sworn affidavits refuting Graham's testimony. Graham has also been identified as one of the police officers on a list of officers that the Philadelphia District Attorney's Office does not call to testify due to credibility concerns.
More than 100 appeals have recently been filed regarding testimony that Graham provided, and in late April Philadelphia President Judge Sheila Woods-Skipper granted unopposed appeals in three of those cases without holding a hearing.
In arguing that he is being treated unfairly, Williams' recent motion noted that Brinkley has called for a hearing regarding Graham's testimony in the case, even though the District Attorney's Office has said it does not oppose Williams' request for a new trial. The motion also said that ”dozens of similar cases from dockets of many different trial judges,” all dealing with Graham, are pending before Woods-Skipper “to assure consistency of treatment and disposition.”
“Ironically, while refusing to join his case with the cases of all other defendants in this court similarly situated, Judge Brinkley insisted at that same hearing that Mr. Williams' case would and must be treated the same as that of any other defendant,” Williams said in the motion.
Regarding arguments that Brinkley is disqualified from handling the case, the motion noted that Brinkley has hired A. Charles Peruto Jr. to make statements on her behalf, and cited an interview Peruto gave to TMZ.com hours after the Pennsylvania Supreme Court granted Williams bail on April 24. The motion also said that bail supervision orders Brinkley issued late last month call for direct judicial involvement on a level that is ”unique and essentially unheard of.”
Both Goldberger and a spokesman for the District Attorney's Office declined to comment for the story.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPhila. Jury Awards $15M to Woman Who Slipped on Apartment Building Stairs
4 minute readPlaintiffs Seek Redo of First Trial Over Medical Device Plant's Emissions
4 minute readHigh Court Revives Kleinbard's Bid to Collect $70K in Legal Fees From Lancaster DA
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Trailblazing Broward Judge Retires; Legacy Includes Bush v. Gore
- 2Federal Judge Named in Lawsuit Over Underage Drinking Party at His California Home
- 3'Almost an Arms Race': California Law Firms Scooped Up Lateral Talent by the Handful in 2024
- 4Pittsburgh Judge Rules Loan Company's Online Arbitration Agreement Unenforceable
- 5As a New Year Dawns, the Value of Florida’s Revised Mediation Laws Comes Into Greater Focus
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250