Trust the Writing Process: How to Perfect Your Legal Prose
We are employed because of our use of language. We must learn to love words, and use them effectively.
May 09, 2018 at 01:25 PM
7 minute read
![Raphael Castro of Pond Lehocky Stern Giordano](https://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/402/2018/02/Raphael-Castro-of-Pond-Lehocky-Stern-Giordano-Vert-201802281532.jpg)
As a young attorney trying to find the best way to express myself on paper, I'm reminded of the Philadelphia 76ers rally cry for their ambitious rebuilding plan.
In writing a motion, legal memoranda, or letter brief, a lawyer must have the virtue of patience and dedication in drafting their work.
We are employed because of our use of language. We must learn to love words, and use them effectively. My law school professor would often say, “there's no such thing as good writing, only good rewriting.” In being committed in the long-term approach, instead of short-term shortcuts in perfecting your legal prose, here are four tips in trusting the writing process.
Know Your Audience
A good lawyer tries to learn as much as possible about the judge who decides their case.
Judges can be persuaded when three conditions are met: they must have a clear idea of what you're asking the court to do, they must be assured that it's within the court's power, and after hearing the reasons, they must conclude that what you're asking for is the best outcome.
Following precedent is a concern for all judges, especially trial judges. Beyond stare decisis, there can be a myriad of possibilities of what can motivate the fact finder. Maybe the credibility of your star witness, or the perceived winner from a battle of the medical experts. Primarily text or primarily policy? Some judges believe that it is their duty to strictly apply the textual ordinary meaning without assessing the consequences, or some judges believe it is their duty to give the text whatever permissible interpretation that will produce the most desirable outcome. All judges would agree that their decision must be driven by fairness for the most equitable result guided by founded legal principle.
Just as important—know what the judge has decided before. The best place to get answers to such questions is from the horse's mouth: Read their decisions and know their judicial philosophy. Also, read any judge's articles and speeches on relevant articles to get to know their idiosyncrasies. Ask junior or senior partners who understand the tendencies of your judge, and ask about their experiences. This insight is invaluable in determining how you want to make your arguments. Put yourself in the shoes of the judge and opposing counsel. Anticipate the other side's arguments and the judge's likely questions when you write.
Bear in mind that trial judges are fundamentally different from appellate judges. Trial judges focus on achieving the proper result in the matter before them, not on crafting seminal law. They will pursue that objective principally through their treatment of facts and discretionary rulings. Therefore, spend your time on the facts and mandatory authority, not policy arguments.
Many firms maintain an interoffice database of previous submissions, categorized by subject matter. Use these templates as a starting point, but specifically tailor the facts to your case. Most importantly, be mindful of your judge's specific rules when submitting a brief such as word length, font, deadlines, or procedural submission requirements.
Know What You're Asking For
We all have short attention spans in the era of smartphones.
When writing, always state up front what you're asking for, and always have a persuasive opening. The objective of a brief is to make the court's job easier. How do you do that as a young lawyer writing to the court? Brevity, clear headlines, identification of the issues, statement of facts and controlling case law.
Put your winning argument up front. For primacy reasons, judicial attention will be highest in the beginning. Pick the best three reasons why you should prevail, and develop them fully. Extra words are the enemy. Make sure you eliminate them. Never waste the court's time since they're burdened with many other cases. In the end, close powerfully and say explicitly what you think the court should do. The conclusion should briefly summarize the main arguments in relation to the law, and why that position must be vindicated.
Your legal and factual premises must be well founded, and your reasoning must logically compel your conclusions. While computers function solely on logic, human beings do not. Judges swear an oath to be impartial, but factors such as emotions, biases and preferences can intervene.
All of us are more apt to be persuaded by someone we like versus someone we dislike. Consequently, your objective in every argument is to show yourself worthy of trust. Be meticulous in making sure there are no grammatical errors. Never mischaracterize precedent to suit your case. Sometimes conceding what should be conceded, you can establish your credentials as a reliable and even-handed counselor. Confront the glaring issues in your case and address them forthright. This shows respect to the intelligence of your audience.
Know Your Case
Have you ever tried to buy something from a salesperson who didn't know anything about their own product? As lawyers, we are selling the merits of our case.
You must become an expert on every legal and factual aspect of their writing. If it becomes clear that the writer does not, the judge (and don't forget their law clerk) will take notice. An example would include omitting a completely necessary case. Do not expect the court to give you too much weight thereafter. You will be arguing to the court about the law, but what law applies—what cases are in point, and what cases can be distinguished—depends ultimately on the facts of the case.
Once you've worked tirelessly on your case, you'll probably be absolutely convinced that your side is a clear winner. As you should. Judges have not put in the same amount of time and have many other cases to consider. You'll suffer a loss of credibility and lose effectiveness of your argument if you exaggerate what is before the court.
Know That Writing Takes Time
Rewriting is not the message we want to hear because it takes work. It means much reflection and trying several variations to see what works best. A good writing style is to write, and to write often.
There are no rough drafts. Whether you are sending a motion, memo, letter, or email to a client, partner, or judge, treat it like it's the most important piece of paper that is tied to your reputation.
The Philadelphia 76ers finished their current 2017-2018 season with 52 wins, more than their past three seasons combined. In suffering through growing pains, it takes time to find the right word choice. It takes time to find our inner voice as a writer, and it is our obligation to those we represent. It takes time to be brutally honest about your initial draft and how you can earnestly improve.
As a young lawyer, you must “Trust The Process” in developing your writing skills as a continuous investment in your legal career.
Raphael F. Castro, an associate at Pond Lehocky Stern Giordano, is a workers' compensation attorney. He earned his law degree from Widener University School of Law, graduating in 2014.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![Pa. Federal District Courts Reach Full Complement Following Latest Confirmation Pa. Federal District Courts Reach Full Complement Following Latest Confirmation](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/38/82/ff7b611443519b770a19692401f4/weilheimer-neary-henry-767x633.jpg)
Pa. Federal District Courts Reach Full Complement Following Latest Confirmation
![The Defense Bar Is Feeling the Strain: Busy Med Mal Trial Schedules Might Be Phila.'s 'New Normal' The Defense Bar Is Feeling the Strain: Busy Med Mal Trial Schedules Might Be Phila.'s 'New Normal'](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/thelegalintelligencer/contrib/content/uploads/sites/402/2023/01/Philadelphia-City-Hall-08-767x633.jpg)
The Defense Bar Is Feeling the Strain: Busy Med Mal Trial Schedules Might Be Phila.'s 'New Normal'
7 minute read![Federal Judge Allows Elderly Woman's Consumer Protection Suit to Proceed Against Citizens Bank Federal Judge Allows Elderly Woman's Consumer Protection Suit to Proceed Against Citizens Bank](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/ba/3b/495247be47fe8b0ba5fcd60e024b/citizens-bank-sign-767x633.jpg)
Federal Judge Allows Elderly Woman's Consumer Protection Suit to Proceed Against Citizens Bank
5 minute read![Judge Leaves Statute of Limitations Question in Injury Crash Suit for a Jury Judge Leaves Statute of Limitations Question in Injury Crash Suit for a Jury](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/thelegalintelligencer/contrib/content/uploads/sites/399/2024/07/18-wheeler-semi-truck-767x633.jpg)
Judge Leaves Statute of Limitations Question in Injury Crash Suit for a Jury
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Coral Gables Attorney Busted for Stalking Lawyer
- 2Trump's DOJ Delays Releasing Jan. 6 FBI Agents List Under Consent Order
- 3Securities Report Says That 2024 Settlements Passed a Total of $5.2B
- 4'Intrusive' Parental Supervision Orders Are Illegal, NY Appeals Court Says
- 5Federal Laws Also Preempt State's Swipe Fee Law on Out-of-State Banks, Judge Rules
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250