Which Pa. Law School Grads Got the Most Jobs Last Year?
Of 10 law schools in Pennsylvania and Delaware, eight beat the national average for graduates employed as licensed lawyers, or in jobs where a law degree is preferred.
May 10, 2018 at 06:18 PM
4 minute read
University of Pennsylvania Law School in Philadelphia. Photo: Jeffrey M. Vinocur/Wikimedia Commons
Employment prospects appear promising for Pennsylvania law students, based on recent data from the American Bar Association about where the class of 2017 found jobs within 10 months of graduation. And the outlook is even brighter for those with an open mind about their line of work after graduation.
Of 10 law schools in Pennsylvania and Delaware, five landed more than 69 percent of their graduates in jobs that require bar passage—69 percent being the national average. They were University of Pennsylvania Law School, Temple University's Beasley School of Law, Villanova University's Charles Widger School of Law, Penn State Law and Drexel University's Thomas R. Kline School of Law.
The best employment rate among them was at Penn Law, where 90.6 percent of graduates landed a job requiring bar admission.
An even greater number of Pennsylvania firms exceeded the national employment average when including jobs that do not require bar passage, but where having a law degree is an advantage.
Nationally, 75.3 percent of graduates got a full-time, permanent job that either requires bar admission or where having a J.D. is an advantage. Eight Pennsylvania schools surpassed that percentage, and Penn Law came in first in the country at 98.8 percent employment.
Drexel, Penn State's Dickinson Law, Duquesne University School of Law and University of Pittsburgh Law School all saw a notable increase in their national employment rankings when J.D.-advantage roles were included.
Nationally, fewer graduates landed in jobs where a law degree is advantageous but bar admission is not required in 2017 than in 2016. Last year 11.8 percent of graduates got those jobs, down from 14.1 percent the year before, the ABA said, and less than 1,100 such jobs were reported.
In addition to leading full-time lawyer and J.D. advantage employment rankings, Penn also had the lowest unemployment rate among the Pennsylvania schools, and the third-lowest unemployment rate nationally, at less than half a percent. And it had the fifth-highest percentage of graduates in “elite” positions—federal clerkships (11 percent of Penn grads) and jobs at law firms of 100 or more lawyers (68 percent of Penn grads).
Widener University Commonwealth Law School and Widener University Delaware Law School , at 67.2 percent and 59.6 percent, respectively, had the lowest full-time employment rates among area firms, and were the only two to fall below the national average.
Looking at the category for elite jobs, Penn far outpaced the other area law firms. Of Penn graduates, 78.5 percent ended up in elite positions, versus 21.7 percent at Temple, the next best Pennsylvania school for elite jobs, followed by Villanova, at 18.2 percent. Other schools fell between 11.1 and 16.7 percent for elite placings, except for Widener Commonwealth and Delaware, at 6.6 percent and 4.6 percent, respectively.
Penn was the only school in the state where more than half of graduates ended up at large law firms. The closest behind were Temple, at 18 percent, Villanova, at 17 percent, and Pitt, at 16 percent.
Several Pennsylvania schools stood out for the number of graduates who got government and public interest jobs. Penn State Dickinson had the sixth highest percentage of grads in those positions, at 31.1 percent. Penn State Law and Widener Commonwealth were not far behind, at 21.9 and 21.3 percent. All three schools are in close proximity to Pennsylvania's capital, Harrisburg.
Few federal clerkships went to Pennsylvania law school grads, according to the ABA, and most of them were at Penn, which had 28 federal clerkships. Dickinson also had three.
As for state and local clerkships, Widener Delaware was a leader in that category, sending 25.7 percent of graduates to those jobs—the fourth-highest percentage nationally.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'The World Didn't End This Morning': Phila. Firm Leaders Respond to Election Results
4 minute readSettlement With Kleinbard in Diversity Contracting Tiff Allows Pa. Lawyer to Avoid Sanctions
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Judge Holds New York City in Contempt Over Conditions at City Jails
- 2FTC Lauds Withdrawal of Proposed Indiana Hospitals Merger After Leaning on State Regulators
- 3Ignore the Decline in US Rule of Law at Your Peril
- 4How Qualcomm’s General Counsel Is Championing Diversity in Innovation
- 5Jury Awards $1.25M to Police Officer Who Claimed Sexual Harassment
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250