Scranton Attorney Suspended Three Years for Sexting Client's Daughter
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has agreed to suspend a Scranton attorney for three years for sending a picture of his penis and masturbating via video-chat with a client's 14-year-old daughter.
May 11, 2018 at 02:08 PM
4 minute read
Jeffrey Toman.
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has agreed to suspend a Scranton attorney for three years for sending a picture of his penis and masturbating via video-chat with a client's 14-year-old daughter.
In a per curiam order issued Wednesday, the justices accepted a joint petition from the Office of Disciplinary Counsel and attorney Jeffrey Toman, which recommended that Toman be suspended for three years. The disciplinary sentence allows the 34-year-old lawyer to petition for reinstatement to the bar after the suspension.
Although the conduct involved a 14-year-old, who was the subject of the custody battle that Toman had been hired to handle, the joint petition recommended the three-year suspension after observing that the attorney had only been convicted on a single first-degree misdemeanor offense and had agreed to serve prison time as part of his criminal sentence.
“Most significantly, respondent is alleged to have manipulated his attorney-client relationship in order to support contacting his client's minor-daughter,” the joint petition said. “Additionally, were the facts as charged established, respondent should have been well-aware that the conduct he engaged in was inappropriate.”
The disciplinary sentence highlights how punishment for sex-related misconduct is often not as severe as the disciplinary measures meted out for mishandling client funds.
According to a recent review of disciplinary cases by The Legal, cases involving the misuse of client money had the highest rate of disbarment, at 29 percent.
Recent examples of this trend include a Pittsburgh divorce lawyer who was disbarred in September after he took a retainer from clients and then went missing in Texas, a Montgomery County solo attorney who was disbarred last year for misusing client money and taking excessive fees, and another Montgomery County lawyer who was disbarred on consent in 2016 amid allegations he misappropriated advanced fees and expense retainers from clients. That attorney was later charged criminally for taking money from clients with special needs.
According to The Legal's review, ineffectiveness and misuse of client funds were the most-frequent forms of misconduct for attorneys in Pennsylvania, with only 2 percent of disciplinary matters stemming from sexual misconduct.
Some attorneys charged with sex-related misconduct, however, do face disbarment. In February, a Philadelphia lawyer was disbarred for allegedly having sex with a 14-year-old girl who had been forced into prostitution by a Germantown couple.
That attorney, Brian Meehan, was sentenced to a two- to four-year prison term in December after being indicted on sexual assault charges in 2014. His Feb. 22 disbarment was a result of his resignation from the practice of law, and was made retroactive to Nov. 6, 2017.
Toman's case, according to a police report attached to the joint petition, involved the 14-year-old daughter of a client whose phone number he allegedly obtained as a way to “better represent her and her mother in the legal battle.” However, instead of discussing the case, Toman began asking the minor sex-related questions and requesting pictures of her in her in her bra and panties, or in a bikini, the report said. According to the police report, Toman also sent the minor a picture of his penis. On one occasion Toman also sent her a video-chat request, and when she answered it he was masturbating, the report said.
Toman, who according to the police report had been friends with the boyfriend of the victim's mother, had also asked the minor to be his girlfriend. The 14-year-old, however, ended the relationship, the report said.
According to the police report, a woman who said she was Toman's girlfriend discovered the texts and threatened the minor if she had any further contact with Toman. The mother, however, discovered the relationship and reported Toman to police. Toman eventually pleaded no contest to a charge of corruption of minors.
The joint disciplinary petition noted that Toman served a portion of his prison sentence, but has been released on probation.
The three-year suspension was made retroactive to Oct. 8.
Toman was represented by Scranton attorney Christopher Powell, who did not return a call seeking comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPhila. Med Mal Lawyers In for Busy Year as Court Adjusts for Filing Boom
3 minute read'Recover, Reflect, Retool and Retry': Lessons From Women Atop Pa. Legal Community
3 minute readEDPA's New Chief Judge Plans to Advance Efforts to Combat Threats to Judiciary
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250