Lancaster Jury Awards $4M Over Misdiagnosis of Infant's Fatal Whooping Cough
A Lancaster County jury on Tuesday found that a pediatric medicine practice group and two doctors failed to diagnose an infant's pertussis, despite the mother repeatedly telling doctors she thought the child was suffering from the rare and potentially fatal condition.
May 18, 2018 at 02:02 PM
4 minute read
The mother of an infant who died after doctors failed to timely diagnose her whooping cough has won a $4 million verdict.
A Lancaster County jury on Tuesday found that a pediatric medicine practice group and two doctors failed to diagnose infant Cali Goldstein's pertussis, despite the mother repeatedly telling doctors she thought the child was suffering from the rare and potentially fatal condition. The award came after more than a week of trial before Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Judge Jeffrey Wright.
The mother, Michelle Goldstein, had contended that she repeatedly told doctors to test for whooping cough as she had recently returned from a trip to California where a large pertussis outbreak had occurred.
Although the doctors denied that Goldstein had told them to check for pertussis, Sprague & Sprague attorney Peter Greiner, who, along with Alan Starker, tried the case for Goldstein, said the jury credited the mother's testimony, and rejected the argument that discovering the condition earlier would not have saved the baby.
“That was a really hard pill for the jury to swallow—that earlier diagnosis and treatment wouldn't have saved Cali, even though 99 percent of infants that get whooping cough don't die from it,” Greiner said.
According to Goldstein's pretrial conference memo, the baby was born Sept. 5, 2010, and died of complications stemming from whooping cough 32 days later. The memo said the baby was born three weeks premature, and began having an unusual cough two days later.
The memo said the baby had coughing fits in front of the doctors, and that Goldstein mentioned she had recently come back from California, where there had been a pertussis outbreak. The memo also said there had been a pertussis outbreak in Lancaster and York counties, with some cases having been as recent as the month before. According to the memo, the doctors ended up “dismissing her concerns as those of a paranoid first-time mother.”
On Sept. 14, the mother took Cali Goldstein to an urgent care center, where she was told to use an over-the-counter cough suppressant.
Cali Goldstein's conditioned worsened, and a chest X-ray was performed. Dr. Jason Gottlieb eventually agreed with a nurse's recommendation that the infant should treat with an inhaler to treat her congestion. On Sept. 29, Dr. Steven Killough also diagnosed Cali Goldstein with bronchitis; however, on Oct. 1, 2010, Cali Goldstein was taken to the Lancaster General Hospital's emergency room after she started having seizures and had become cyanotic. Although Cali Goldstein was placed on life support, she died on Oct. 7.
During trial, Dr. Herschel Lessin, Dr. Danny Benjamin and Dr. Jon Meliones provided expert testimony for the plaintiff, as did economist Andrew Verzilli.
Dr. Timothy Shope, Dr. Eugene Shapiro and Bruce Greenwald provided expert testimony for the defendants.
In their pretrial memo, the doctors contended that their treatment was within the standard of care, and that none of the doctors would have refused to test the infant for whooping cough, if Michelle Goldstein had asked them to.
“In sum plaintiff's case relies on convincing a Lancaster County jury that four well-respected board certified pediatricians, a CRNP, and a physician assistant would each refuse to perform a simple nasal swab test,” the memo, filed by Saxton & Stump attorney Christopher Stump, said.
The jury determined that two doctors who saw Cali Goldstein early on were not negligent, but that the Lancaster Pediatric Associates was 50 percent at fault for the death and that Gottlieb and Killough were each 25 percent at fault.
A nurse who also treated the infant previously settled for an undisclosed sum. The nurse was on the jury sheet, however, and the jury determined the nurse was not negligent.
The jury also awarded more than $1.1 million on a wrongful death claim, and nearly $1.9 on a survival claim.
A message left with Stump and Saxton & Stump attorney Steven Costello, who tried the case for the defendants, was not returned.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Recover, Reflect, Retool and Retry': Lessons From Women Atop Pa. Legal Community
3 minute readEDPA's New Chief Judge Plans to Advance Efforts to Combat Threats to Judiciary
3 minute readPa. Superior Court's Next Leader Looks Ahead to Looming Challenges in Coming Years
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Elon Musk Names Microsoft, Calif. AG to Amended OpenAI Suit
- 2Trump’s Plan to Purge Democracy
- 3Baltimore City Govt., After Winning Opioid Jury Trial, Preparing to Demand an Additional $11B for Abatement Costs
- 4X Joins Legal Attack on California's New Deepfakes Law
- 5Monsanto Wins Latest Philadelphia Roundup Trial
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250