Law Firm Cybersecurity 'an Imperative' as Clients Make Demands Clear
Firms of all sizes are thinking about how to protect confidential client data.
May 21, 2018 at 12:53 PM
4 minute read
As corporate clients fret over the potential threat posed by cyber breaches, Pennsylvania law firms are increasingly making data privacy and cybersecurity a top priority, putting time and resources behind the effort.
Legal software company Aderant this month released its second “Business of Law and Legal Technology” survey, which showed general optimism among law firm professionals. But when respondents were asked about the key challenges they faced, more than 32 percent of them named cybersecurity as a top concern.
Pennsylvania law firms are grappling with the issue—and the cost—along with the rest of the industry. Law firm technology professionals and firm management in the region say the days are gone when clients could treat their outside lawyers' cybersecurity efforts as an afterthought.
Devin Chwastyk, chair of the privacy and data security group at McNees Wallace & Nurick, said the driver for law firm clients has been demands from their customers for assurance of data privacy. More and more, he said, clients are putting data security addenda on their fee agreements.
“Every RFP now requires us to disclose how we protect confidential information,” said Jeff Lobach, managing partner of Barley Snyder. And that requires a greater investment of time and money, he said.
Lobach said clients have never been dissatisfied with the measures his firm has put in place. But if they were, he said, the firm would likely be expected to change its practices to keep the work.
“Cybersecurity as a line item has certainly become a bigger expense for us,” Chwastyk said. “That was inevitable regardless of client demands.”
Cyber insurance is another driver of increased cybersecurity standards at law firms, Chwastyk said, as firms must enact a certain level of safeguards to obtain coverage.
Alan Promer, a partner who chairs the technology committee at Hangley Aronchick Segal Pudlin & Schiller, said his firm, too, has seen an increase in its technology spend, and that is due in part to security costs. Technology on the whole has become a greater expense for law firms, and since not all of the costs are scalable, the impact is outsized at small and midsize firms.
“It really is an imperative” to stay up-to-date on cybersecurity measures, Promer said, pointing to client requirements. Smaller clients and individuals may not have extensive knowledge and specific demands, he said, but larger institutions often have an entire in-house team dedicated to data privacy and cybersecurity.
He said clients regularly inquire about Hangley Aronchick's cybersecurity resources, which include firewalls, intrusion detection, antivirus systems, encryption and multi-factor authentication. Every year the firm gets a security audit by an outside contractor.
“It's been years, and it evolves constantly,” Promer said.
Over time, he noted, cybersecurity has become increasingly “professionalized” at law firms of various sizes, which are hiring dedicated professionals with extensive technology training to handle it.
“A smart lawyer is only going to engage in the things they're knowledgeable about,” Promer said. “I don't know many lawyers that speak fluent cybersecurity.”
From talking with data privacy professionals at other firms, Chwastyk said it's clear that cybersecurity concerns are common to firms of all sizes. “A lot of the client pressures are the same,” he said. But, he noted, firms are generally more cognizant of the issues if they do commercial work, particularly for clients in regulated industries such as insurance, financial services and health care.
“Even the solo practitioners are worried about this,” Chwastyk said. “They all recognize they have particular obligations under the rules of professional conduct to guarantee confidentiality.”
For more business of law coverage exclusively geared toward midsize firms, sign up for a free trial of ALM's new weekly newsletter, The Mid-Market Report.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'The World Didn't End This Morning': Phila. Firm Leaders Respond to Election Results
4 minute readSettlement With Kleinbard in Diversity Contracting Tiff Allows Pa. Lawyer to Avoid Sanctions
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Silk Road Founder Ross Ulbricht Has New York Sentence Pardoned by Trump
- 2Settlement Allows Spouses of U.S. Citizens to Reopen Removal Proceedings
- 3CFPB Resolves Flurry of Enforcement Actions in Biden's Final Week
- 4Judge Orders SoCal Edison to Preserve Evidence Relating to Los Angeles Wildfires
- 5Legal Community Luminaries Honored at New York State Bar Association’s Annual Meeting
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250