Efficiency-Minded Am Law 200 Firms Grow Margins in Pa.
All but two Am Law 200 firms founded in the Keystone State saw gains in profits per partner last year.
May 22, 2018 at 09:34 AM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The American Lawyer
Pennsylvania's large law firms were mostly upbeat coming out of 2017, as they began to see the fruits of their efforts to grow profit margins through efficiency, and looked ahead to future gains from recent investments.
The American Lawyer released its rankings of the Am Law 200 firms Tuesday, providing a picture of how Big Law fared in 2017, including 15 firms founded in Pennsylvania.
Five Pennsylvania firms made the Second Hundred: Pepper Hamilton (101); Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney (112); Saul Ewing Arnstein & Lehr (133); Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin (141); and Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott (166).
Of the 13 Am Law 200 firms founded in Pennsylvania that also made the 200 in 2016, all but two posted at least a slight gain in profits per equity partner in 2017, compared to the year before. Seven increased PPP by more than 5 percent—the amount of year-over-year PPP growth across the entire Am Law 200.
(Marshall Dennehey and Eckert Seamans were not included in last year's Am Law 200.)
Revenue per lawyer increased by just half a percent on average among firms founded in Pennsylvania, even with double-digit gross revenue gains at Cozen O'Connor and Saul Ewing. While the majority of firms saw RPL increase year-over-year, three firms saw their RPL dip, including a decline of 15.3 percent at K&L Gates.
The new year appears to have started well too. First-quarter data from Citi Private Bank showed that Pennsylvania firms' revenue growth for the quarter was way above the national average, and demand grew more than twice as quickly in Pennsylvania than it did nationally.
While law firm leadership across the U.S. recently have expressed frustration with their partners' openness to change, Pennsylvania firms said they have seen progress in implementing efficiency measures.
They said they are focused on growing the bottom line through various means. While a few mention specific cost-cutting measures, many highlight a focus on staffing for efficiency, project management and alternative fee arrangements.
Duane Morris chairman Matt Taylor said practice group heads at his firm have encouraged lawyers to be project managers. The firm as a whole, he said, has adopted a “nimble approach” as clients demand more creativity in billing and fees.
Blank Rome aimed to keep expense growth under 1 percent, and used separate litigation and transactional pricing teams to create better cost predictability for clients, chairman Alan Hoffman said.
[PremCon id="testid"]Dive into the Am Law 200 data and personalize it based on your firm, peers and trends. Learn More[/PremCon]
Pepper Hamilton managing partner Tom Cole said his firm has been more proactive about offering alternative fee arrangements, giving clients a budget before they ask for it. The firm saw gross revenue decline slightly in 2017, bumping it down from the Am Law 100 to the Second Hundred, but chairman Tom Gallagher said it is more focused on “delivering profitable work,” pointing to PPP growth of 14.3 percent.
Reed Smith managing partner Sandy Thomas said the firm has continuously monitored head count against demand since shrinking its lawyer ranks in 2016. The firm aims to increase realization through its client value team.
Despite the push for efficiency, firms are not backing away from making investments.
Pepper Hamilton placed a focus on partner recruitment and talent management in 2017, implementing new C-suite roles to focus on those functions. And Fox Rothschild's Mark Morris said expenses grew last year, as the firm worked to fit its infrastructure around lateral hires from prior years. Drinker Biddle & Reath chairman Andrew Kassner said he's looking to grow the firm's ancillary businesses and consulting services.
A couple of firms experienced significant head count growth as well, resulting in gross revenue gains, in a year when law firm merger activity hit an all-time high.
Saul Ewing grew gross revenue by 43 percent after merging with midsize law firm Arnstein & Lehr, bringing the firm's total head count to about 400.
Cozen O'Connor grew gross revenue by 10.7 percent as it aggressively recruited lateral partners, increasing head count by a net 48 lawyers throughout the year.
Ballard Spahr also benefited from a merger, showing growth in its media law practice after acquiring media boutique Levine Sullivan Koch & Schulz. But the firm is expected to grow by a greater margin this year, after its merger with Midwest-based Lindquist & Vennum became official Jan. 1, adding 107 lawyers.
The two deals came after a merger drought of sorts for Ballard Spahr, whose last significant combination was its 2013 acquisition of Stillman & Friedman, a white-collar and securities litigation boutique.
Citi's report, too, showed that Pennsylvania firms aren't afraid to spend where they need to, as their expense growth in the first quarter was greater than the national average. But increases in expenses did not outpace revenue growth, Citi found.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'The World Didn't End This Morning': Phila. Firm Leaders Respond to Election Results
4 minute readSettlement With Kleinbard in Diversity Contracting Tiff Allows Pa. Lawyer to Avoid Sanctions
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250