Seeger Weiss Awarded $51M in Fees for 'Landmark' NFL Concussion Settlement
Most of the attorney fees a federal judge has allocated to the lawyers who hammered out the NFL concussion settlement are set to go to one firm: New York-based Seeger Weiss.
May 24, 2018 at 06:56 PM
3 minute read
Most of the attorney fees a federal judge has allocated to the lawyers who hammered out the NFL concussion settlement are set to go to one firm: New York-based Seeger Weiss.
On Thursday, U.S. District Judge Anita Brody of the Eastern District of Pennsylvania awarded more than $51 million to the Manhattan law firm, which is home to Chris Seeger, who acted as co-lead class counsel in the $1 billion settlement. In total, Brody divided up $85.6 million between more than 20 firms that were involved in developing the class settlement, which is expected to compensate more than 20,000 former NFL players who suffered cognitive injuries during their time with the league.
Although a total of $112.5 million in legal fees were set aside under the settlement agreement, Brody said she had decided to hold $26.9 million in reserve to cover attorney fees as the settlement continues to be implemented over the next 65 years.
In her 27-page opinion, Brody said Seeger deserved the lion's share of the award because his firm took on significant risk and burden in taking the lead in the case.
“Some objectors have attempted to argue that Seeger Weiss did not bear much risk in this litigation,” Brody said, noting that the firm spent 21,044 hours on the case. “The billable hours submitted in this case speak for themselves.”
Brody also said that, because the case settled before bellwether trials, or significant discovery took place, most of the benefit to the class as a whole came through negotiations and efforts toward structuring the settlement.
“Seeger Weiss and professor [Samuel] Issacharoff constructed a landmark legal theory to defend the settlement of this personal injury case as a class action,” Brody said. “This was a great legal challenge that was remarkably well orchestrated both in the design of the settlement and in the outstanding appellate advocacy that supported it.”
In an emailed statement, Seeger said, “We appreciate Judge Brody's consideration of the matter.”
Although the award is far more than any other firm received it is significantly less than what Seeger had requested from the court. In October, the attorney asked Brody to award more than $70 million to his firm.
Despite the difference in Seeger's award, Brody's award tracks somewhat closely with the fee allocations that Seeger had pitched to the court last fall.
Seeger's proposal had said Philadelphia firm Levin Sedran & Berman should have received the second-highest award, at $10.3 million for nearly 5,000 hours spent on the case. He also said Miami-based Podhurst Orseck should receive $6.7 million, and Anapol Weiss, which is home to Sol Weiss, Seeger's co-lead class counsel, should get $4.6 million.
Brody allocated $8.4 million to Levin Sedran, $6 million to Podhurst and $4.6 million to Anapol Weiss.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Recover, Reflect, Retool and Retry': Lessons From Women Atop Pa. Legal Community
3 minute readEDPA's New Chief Judge Plans to Advance Efforts to Combat Threats to Judiciary
3 minute readPa. Superior Court's Next Leader Looks Ahead to Looming Challenges in Coming Years
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Elon Musk Names Microsoft, Calif. AG to Amended OpenAI Suit
- 2Trump’s Plan to Purge Democracy
- 3Baltimore City Govt., After Winning Opioid Jury Trial, Preparing to Demand an Additional $11B for Abatement Costs
- 4X Joins Legal Attack on California's New Deepfakes Law
- 5Monsanto Wins Latest Philadelphia Roundup Trial
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250