Ex-Brady Aide Smukler Asks Judge to Dismiss Multiple Charges Against Him
Ken Smukler is facing prosecution for his alleged role in paying off one of Brady's political opponents to drop out of the 2012 Democratic primary.
May 29, 2018 at 12:58 PM
4 minute read
Photo: Shutterstock.com
Kenneth Smukler, the Philadelphia political consultant formerly associated with retiring U.S. Congressman Bob Brady, has asked a federal judge to dismiss election law-related charges against him involving another politician.
Smukler is facing prosecution for his alleged role in paying off one of Brady's political opponents to drop out of the 2012 Democratic primary. He has also been charged by superseding indictment with allegedly making hundreds of thousands of dollars in illegal donations to former Congresswoman Marjorie Margolies' campaign in her failed 2014 bid to reclaim the seat, while obstructing the corresponding federal investigation.
In a flurry of motions filed May 25, Smukler claimed the government failed to show that he violated the Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA) related to the Margolies campaign, or that he obstructed a Federal Election Commission (FEC) investigation by willfully making false campaign finance filings.
Additionally, he claimed that a charge relating to violating the campaign contribution limit was barred by the statute of limitations.
Along with these motions, Smukler filed court papers claiming federal investigators violated his attorney-client privilege.
“Without any notice to Mr. Smukler or this court, the government trampled on this privilege, interviewing Karl Sandstrom, Esquire, about his protected communications with Mr. Smukler,” Smukler's attorney, Jon Fetterolf, wrote in a memorandum.
“It did so on the purported basis of a privilege waiver by candidate Marjorie Margolies—which the government knew or should have known was an ineffective and invalid waiver both as to the privilege held by Marjorie 2014, the campaign committee, and the privilege held by Mr. Smukler,” the memorandum continued. “And now confronted with the defects in its waiver, the government's belated attempt to avail itself of the crime-fraud exception cannot retroactively excuse the deliberate and improper intrusion into privileged communications for the purpose of obtaining an indictment against Mr. Smukler.”
Fetterolf declined to comment.
This filing follows Smukler's failure to convince the judge presiding over his case to throw out evidence obtained from a March 2017 FBI raid of Smukler's home.
Smukler argued that the FBI's search warrant was faulty because a federal agent intentionally omitted the fact that the FEC had previously investigated and dismissed one of the claims against the Margolies campaign alleged in the search warrant affidavit.
However, U.S. District Judge Jan E. DuBois of the Eastern District of Pennsylvania said that the allegations in the affidavit went beyond the scope of the FEC's inquiry into Margolies' 2014 campaign finances.
The superseding indictment issued by a federal grand jury in Philadelphia on March 20 restated the original charges against Smukler involving a $90,000 payment to Brady's opponent, former Philadelphia Judge Jimmie Moore, and added new charges alleging that Smukler used his companies to inject cash into Margolies' losing campaign in the 2014 Democratic congressional primary, while also having false financial reports filed to the FEC to hide the illicit payments made to the campaign.
According to the indictment, the campaign was running out of money to pay for primary election expenses, but Smukler directed the campaign treasurer to continue purchasing goods and services. Prosecutors allege Smukler used his companies, Black and Blue Media and InfoVoter Technologies, to funnel money to the campaign while it was active and also after it had lost the election in order to pay off its debts. The alleged contributions exceeded the limits set by the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 for individual donors during a single election cycle, the indictment said.
Smukler was first indicted Oct. 24. While the case against Smukler, who pleaded not guilty to the initial charges, is ongoing, the investigation has netted guilty pleas from former Brady aide and political consultant Don “D.A.” Jones, Moore and Moore's former campaign manager, Carolyn Cavaness. It is not clear how these guilty pleas might affect the case against Smukler.
Brady was never charged and prosecutors have since missed their window to indict him.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllThe Forgotten Ballot: Expanding Voting Access for Incarcerated Populations
5 minute readSuspected Shooter of UnitedHealthcare CEO Is Charged With Murder in New York. Now What?
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250