Pa. Law Firms Watch and Wait After Milbank Salary Boost
Most Pennsylvania firms aren't likely to match the latest associate pay raises emanating from New York, though associates in Philadelphia and elsewhere may enjoy a "trickle-down" effect.
June 08, 2018 at 01:04 PM
6 minute read
Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy sent reverberations across the legal industry when it hiked the salaries of its greenest lawyers to nearly $200,000. But most Pennsylvania associates are unlikely to see an immediate impact on their paychecks.
Milbank announced June 4 that it planned to increase its associate salaries by $10,000 for first- to third-years and $15,000 for the rest, making its starting pay for associates $190,000. Several firms have already matched the scale, including Proskauer Rose, Winston & Strawn and Simpson Thacher & Bartlett.
Still, observers predict many large firms will resist pressure to follow suit. And most Pennsylvania law firms seem highly unlikely to match Milbank's starting pay.
“I think firms who compete for that caliber of associate and have the clients willing to pay the rates required to support that level of compensation will look hard at this,” consultant Jim Cotterman of Altman Weil Inc. said, in an email. “The number of firms should be limited, in my view.”
But that doesn't mean Philadelphia and Pittsburgh firms aren't listening to the buzz.
“My assumption is it will be sort of a trickle-down effect,” said Jason Mandel, director of legal recruitment at Alevistar Group, who works with candidates at the associate and partner levels. But “Philadelphia is usually slower to adapt I would say than the New York firms.”
Two years ago, when Cravath, Swaine & Moore started the wave of associate raises that brought many first-years a $180,000 salary, it took more than a week for the first Pennsylvania-born firm, Dechert, to follow suit. Morgan, Lewis & Bockius and Reed Smith later announced new pay scales that brought first-year associates to that same pay, but not in every office.
And even after the biggest firms made their moves, many large firms based in Pennsylvania chose not to raise their pay to the same level. So it may not come as a surprise that Pennsylvania firms in the Am Law 200 are eyeing the latest increases with caution.
Contacted this week after Milbank's announcement, only four of the 15 Am Law 200 firms founded in Pennsylvania commented on the news, and none expressed immediate plans for a raise. Still, several firms acknowledged that they monitor the rest of the market in their periodic compensation discussions.
Pittsburgh-born international firm Reed Smith did raise associate salaries on a geographic basis in 2016, matching $180,000 in some markets. Asked about Milbank's raise, global head of legal personnel Casey Ryan said Reed Smith “will as always continue to monitor the market and make the best decisions about when and if adjustments are necessary.”
Duane Morris chairman Matt Taylor said, “We always analyze the market and try to be as responsive as possible, but always try to be responsible to how we serve our clients.”
Two other firms simply said they consider associate compensation at the same time each year—and it's not that time yet.
“We evaluate associate compensation once a year. At that time we evaluate many factors, including the market. We would expect to do the same again at the end of 2018,” Cozen O'Connor CEO Michael Heller said.
A spokeswoman for Saul Ewing Arnstein & Lehr said the firm evaluates its compensation structure at the beginning of each year, and has no plans to change it within the next few months.
Other Am Law 200 firms declined to comment or did not respond to requests for comment.
'When, Not If'
As firm leaders watch the market, so do associates.
“Young lawyers are certainly cognizant of these types of decisions,” said Vincent Barbera, chair of the Philadelphia Bar Association's Young Lawyers Division, who practices at White and Williams. But that doesn't mean they're flocking to New York for top-of-market pay.
Barbera said associates also place priority on quality of work and quality of life, making them “hungry for good, practical work experience.” And Philadelphia is a different legal market than New York, he noted—with greater collegiality and a more close-knit legal community, in his opinion.
Taylor, of Duane Morris, said his firm tries to be responsive to market changes in its compensation decisions, but has to be mindful of clients as well. And he said Philadelphia, where Duane Morris associates are paid $165,000, simply has different economic pressures than New York.
“Every firm is different. Every firm has its own client mix, and that's an important factor,” Taylor said.
Tricia Horter, senior vice president in Citizens Bank's professionals banking group, said because most Pennsylvania firms chose not to match Cravath in the last round of raises, it's unlikely any of them will choose to match Milbank.
“Firms look at each market differently, which is the right approach,” she said.
After the economic downturn, a lot of large law firms ”did some good soul-searching” to figure out who they are and what they want to be, Horter said. Now they're doing pretty well, she said, and “I don't think there's going to be much tinkering, nor do I think there really needs to be.”
Mandel said Milbank's decision will likely have an impact on Pennsylvania associates at some point, but it will take time. The economy is good right now, he said, but firms learned from the recession to be cautious with their approach to compensation.
“It's going to be an upward move and it's just a matter of when, not if, at this point,” he said.
Likewise, Barbera said, salary increases are encouraging, even if they start in a very different segment of the legal industry.
“I view it more as a tool for firms to compete for talent, but it certainly reflects the strength of the legal market right now,” he said. “And that's a positive thing.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'The World Didn't End This Morning': Phila. Firm Leaders Respond to Election Results
4 minute readSettlement With Kleinbard in Diversity Contracting Tiff Allows Pa. Lawyer to Avoid Sanctions
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1California Court Denies Apple's Motion to Strike Allegations in Gender Bias Class Action
- 2US DOJ Threatens to Prosecute Local Officials Who Don't Aid Immigration Enforcement
- 3Kirkland Is Entering a New Market. Will Its Rates Get a Warm Welcome?
- 4African Law Firm Investigated Over ‘AI-Generated’ Case References
- 5Gen AI and Associate Legal Writing: Davis Wright Tremaine's New Training Model
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250