Art of the Triple Crown: Justify's Big Win for McNees Wallace
Michael Doctrow, who is handling trademark matters for Triple Crown winner Justify, talked about finding a niche, how gambling makes him a wreck, and how people love "horse art."
June 13, 2018 at 06:02 PM
6 minute read
Michael Doctrow, a partner at central Pennsylvania-based McNees Wallace & Nurick, turned a relationship with a car dealer into a niche practice representing owners of some of the fastest horses in the country. Doctrow and his firm have represented a number of thoroughbreds that have made a bid for the American Triple Crown. None had been successful until June 9, when his 2018 hopeful, Justify, won the Belmont Stakes. Doctrow was in Florida for the weekend, unable to see the race in person, but he checked into a local sports bar to watch. Beyond the thrill of the win, having a Triple Crown client isn't likely to hurt Doctrow's intellectual property practice. He spoke this week with The Legal about how he started representing prize racehorses and what the work entails. Answers have been edited lightly for length and clarity. How did you get into representing Triple Crown hopefuls? Smarty Jones would have been the first one in 2004. Smarty Jones was owned by an auto dealer in Philadelphia that we represented, the Chapman family. I handled their intellectual property work. Those folks got me involved initially. How many horses have you represented? Probably about 10 horses over the last 15 years. And we only represent Kentucky Derby winners. What kind of services do you provide to the teams surrounding these horses? Basic trademark and copyright work, which would include registering and protecting their brands, and the image of the horse. And licensing transactions, including licensing the image and name of the horse … on things such as T-shirts and hats, initially. With success in at least two of the three races [we do licensing] on collectible items—now, [with Justify winning the Triple Crown] on many, many more items. Also licensing the name and image on art … of course horse art is very popular. Finally, [I'm also] negotiating sponsorship deals, such as the deal with Wheels Up where their name appeared on the jockey's shorts and on the owners' hats that they wear. We do not get involved in the breeding rights side of this practice. How do you maintain these relationships year to year, as the horses and their owners change? That's really the art of marketing as an attorney, is developing relationships with people—people who come to trust you and recommend you to the next group of folks that come along. We did what I think was a very good job in marketing and licensing the merchandise around Smarty Jones. The folks who were associated with Churchill Downs or the Thoroughbred Association recommended us to subsequent owners as people who know how to get the job done. We've maintained a level of visibility in the horse racing world. Do you spend a lot of time at the racetrack this time of year? Very little this time of year. I will go to the racetrack in the off-season to meet people when there's more opportunity to meet people. I have attended the Belmont and the Kentucky Derby with owners who were kind enough to introduce me to other owners and merchandisers. But like other legal work these days, a lot of it is done over the phone and email. It's all very similar to my work that I do for business clients, except it is boiled down to anywhere from a three- week to a six-week period. How much of your practice does this work make up each year? Some years, it's a healthy amount. With Smarty Jones it was a healthy amount. With Barbaro, who was unfortunately injured at the track, it was a healthy amount as well. Most years, it's a couple of weeks and a couple of contracts. This year fortunately there will be ongoing sponsorship deals, potentially book deals and movie deals. There are a couple of nice stories to tell about this horse and about the owners. Do you think there is more legal work to be had this time, given Justify's undefeated status and success in winning the Triple Crown distinction? Apart from potential book deals and movie deals and ongoing sponsorship deals, the extent of licensing and the nature of the products on which the mark will go is certainly more significant. The work we do in enforcing the trademark against counterfeiters online is certainly more substantial. How much does this mesh with the rest of your practice? In what ways does it stand out? It's the exact same work in a shorter period of time. The really unique part of this practice is when we work for our business clients, most of the work is lower visibility, does not appear in the newspapers. We like to remain behind the scenes and not interfere with things. This is obviously much more visible to everyone. From a firm marketing perspective, it just happens to be more significant. I have a laundry list of clients who have called me to congratulate me. Outside of your work with these thoroughbreds, do you have an interest in horse racing? I am not much of a gambler, frankly. I will tell you I am a nervous wreck at these races, and it's not good to be a nervous wreck when you gamble. What I love about the sport is the horses are just absolutely beautiful animals. This has given me the opportunity to see some of these animals off the track, and seeing a thoroughbred racehorse being released in the field and running on his own and dancing in the field is really a spectacular thing to see. That's the part of it I enjoy more than the track aspect.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllImmunity for Mental Health Care and Coverage for CBD: What's on the Pa. High Court's November Calendar
5 minute readSlip-and-Fall Suit Cleared to Proceed Against Kalahari Indoor Waterpark
3 minute readVolunteering for Voter Protection Efforts, Pa. Firms Brace for Contentious Election
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Free Speech Causes a Neighborly Feud
- 2Read the Document: 'Google Must Divest Chrome,' DOJ Says, Proposing Remedies in Search Monopoly Case
- 3Voir Dire Voyeur: I Find Out What Kind of Juror I’d Be
- 4When It Comes to Local Law 97 Compliance, You’ve Gotta Have (Good) Faith
- 5Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference East 2024: Virginia Griffith, Director of Business Development at OutsideGC
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250