Planning a Future for Graduating Foreign Students in Extraordinary Times
Graduation caps are soaring across the United States, as millions of college students complete their studies and prepare to enter the workforce.
June 15, 2018 at 03:56 PM
5 minute read
Graduation caps are soaring across the United States, as millions of college students complete their studies and prepare to enter the workforce. For international students studying in the United States, there is a palpable uncertainty about the future, as the immigration landscape has become incredibly daunting and highly restrictive. Determining the best course of action has always been a challenge, but with the U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services (USCIS) issuing substantially more case challenges and denials, it is even more incumbent upon students to assess their options and determine the most opportune path to securing coveted work authorization in the United States.
A student on a typical F-1 visa can obtain authorization to work for one-year after graduation pursuant to optional practical training (OPT). Those students working in a STEM field are also currently eligible to obtain an additional 24 months of work authorization, although the Trump administration is expected to propose regulations eliminating the ability to obtain this extension. Upon completion of OPT, the student is also afforded a 60-day grace period, during which they are eligible to apply for a change of status. However, practically speaking, both employers and students should be assessing post OPT options as soon as possible.
A common initial option to consider is the H-1B visa, which requires the foreign national to possess a bachelor's degree or higher in a field of study related to their offer of employment. These applications must be filed in the first week of April and there is a cap on the number of H-1B's that can be issued each year. This year there were approximately 190,000 H-1B applications for 85,000 available H-1B visas. The H-1B is initially valid for three years and can be extended for an additional three-year period. H-1B status is also very valuable because it is a “dual intent” status, which means that a foreign national is free to pursue a green card and need not demonstrate an intent to return to their home country.
If a student misses out on the H-1B cap, the L-1A or L-1B visa also merits strong consideration. As an initial matter, the student must work full-time for one-year abroad for a foreign company. After completion of the one-year requirement, a majority owned U.S. parent, affiliate or subsidiary company, can sponsor the employee. An individual acting in a managerial capacity would file under the L-1 A category, while an employee with unique or distinct knowledge of the company's business processes would be eligible to file an L-1B case.
Those students with an entrepreneurial bent, may also wish to consider the O-1 visa, as this option is available to those who can demonstrate “extraordinary ability” in their chosen field of endeavor. While the O-1 standard is challenging, many students who have founded/co-founded startup companies have been able to leverage such accomplishments into successful O-1 visa applications.
Additional “startup” visa paths should also include examination of the EB-5 or E-2 visa. The EB-5 visa program, established in 1990, requires an investment of at least $500,000 or $1 million (depending on the location of the investment) into a business that would create at least 10 U.S. jobs. The E-2 visa is only available for nationals of countries that have bilateral investment treaties or treaties of friendship, commerce and navigation with the United States. The amount of the required investment varies depending upon the type of business (e.g., a consulting firm may require a relatively small investment—sometimes under $100,000—whereas a manufacturing company will require a much larger investment). The investor will need to prove that he has other available funds in addition to the funds invested in the U.S. business or that the business will be employing one or more U.S. workers. The investor can (but is not required to) work in the business. If the foreign national is not a citizen of a treaty country, there is an option to acquire citizenship through investment.
A student can also consider returning to school. Either retaining or going back to F-1 status may provide enough time until H-1B numbers again become available (assuming, of course, the same or a different position with the same or a different employer may still be available to the foreign national many months later at the conclusion of studies). Pursuing an advanced degree, in addition to its educational advantages, and in addition to buying time until H-1B numbers are available, adds various benefits under the immigration laws. Indeed, the advanced degree obtained in the United States makes the foreign national eligible for a separate quota of advanced-degree H-1B numbers.
Of course, these are just a sample of the potential visa options that are available to foreign students. Clearly, graduating international students that wish to remain in the United States to live and work, either on a temporary or permanent basis, need to evaluate their long-term goals and map out a career path, along with a carefully crafted immigration plan that will help them to achieve their career goals.
Andrew J. Zeltner is an associate in the firm's Philadelphia office. Zeltner handles a wide array of corporate immigration matters including those involving the processing of permanent resident applications (green cards) on behalf of multinational corporate and individual clients, including labor certification applications, immigrant visa petitions and adjustment of status applications.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFederal Judge Allows Elderly Woman's Consumer Protection Suit to Proceed Against Citizens Bank
5 minute readJudge Leaves Statute of Limitations Question in Injury Crash Suit for a Jury
4 minute readSupreme Court's Ruling in 'Students for Fair Admissions' and Its Impact on DEI Initiatives in the Workplace
6 minute readMembership Has Its Privileges: Bankruptcy Court Examines LLC's Authority to File Bankruptcy
8 minute readTrending Stories
- 1LA Judge Anne Hwang Confirmed to the Federal Bench
- 2NY Court Leaders Ask for 10% Judiciary Budget Increase
- 3ClaimClam Wanted to Boost Class Action Claims Rates. But Judges and Attorneys Fought Back
- 4'We Will Sue ... Immediately': AG Bonta Says He's Ready to Spend $25M Battling Trump
- 511 Red State AGs Demand Damages in Antitrust Lawsuit Shaming ESG Climate Investors
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250