Note: Although Scott Pruitt resigned in early July as Administrator of the EPA, his resignation does not withdraw or invalidate any of the actions discussed in this article. Acting Administrator Andrew Wheeler may change some proposals as they proceed through administrative review, but there is no indication that the goals of EPA under the present administration will change.

The efforts of Scott Pruitt’s EPA (Pruitt has since resigned) to terminate major programs have often ended in major failures in court. Other efforts, such as slowing down regulatory responses to emerging contaminant problems, or reducing the numerical precision required in effluent or emission compliance reports, could allow reductions in compliance with prior environmental standards and may be less open to judicial review. On the other hand, operating under such policies may create uncertainty for regulated companies and lead them to become enforcement “guinea pigs” in future citizen suits with dire business consequences. This article will examine these fast-moving and high stakes developments.

Statutory Constraints on Deregulation

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]