Let us consider the case of an automated software robot conducting financial transactions on behalf of a company. The robot makes a mistake, causing financial loss for the firm’s client. Who is responsible in this case? Is it the company that owns the process, the third-party consultant that designed the robotic process or the software vendor that developed the robot?
An automated underwriting process using artificial intelligence (AI) unfairly discriminates against a specific socially economic group because of a flaw or bias in the underlying AI algorithm. Does the company that used the algorithm even understand how it really works?
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]