Defendant in Rear-End Collision Not Liable for Injuries
On Sept. 11, 2014, plaintiff Hassania Firoud, 53, a retail employee, was driving a minivan on Frankford Avenue, in Northeast Philadelphia. After she became stopped in traffic at Robbins Street, she was rear-ended by a sport-utility vehicle.
August 09, 2018 at 03:27 PM
4 minute read
Firoud v. Carr
Defense Verdict
Date of Verdict: June 28.
Court and Case No.: C.P. Philadelphia, No. 160803547.
Judge: Edward C. Wright.
Type of Action: Motor vehicle.
Injuries: Back and neck.
Plaintiffs Counsel: Ryan S. Kilmer of Adams Renzi Law.
Plaintiffs Experts: Sherri Landes, psychology; Randall Smith, orthopedic surgery.
Defense Counsel: Michael Benjamin Gerstein of Bennett, Bricklin & Saltzburg.
Defense Experts: Andrew H. Shaer, radiology.
Comment:
On Sept. 11, 2014, plaintiff Hassania Firoud, 53, a retail employee, was driving a minivan on Frankford Avenue, in Northeast Philadelphia. After she became stopped in traffic at Robbins Street, she was rear-ended by a sport-utility vehicle. The SUV had been rear-ended by a vehicle driven by Jean Carr, and the impact pushed the SUV into the back of Firoud's minivan. She claimed permanent neck and back injuries.
Firoud sued Carr, alleging that she was negligent. She also sued the vehicle's owner, Patrick Carr, who was dismissed, prior to trial.
Carr stipulated to negligence, and the case was tried on the issues of causation and damages.
The next day, Firoud, complaining of neck pain, presented to her family physician, who recommended physical therapy. On Sept. 22, Firoud began a course of physical therapy, which she discontinued after five visits after switching health providers.
In October, Firoud came under the care of a physiatrist and an orthopedic surgeon, whom she had seen previously, for complaints of headaches, anxiety, depression and panic attacks. Firoud had MRIs and was diagnosed with herniations at cervical and lumbar intervertebral discs C3-4, C5-6 and L4-5. She was also clinically diagnosed with bilateral radiculopathy stemming from her lumbar spine, as she complained of radiating pain into her legs. Firoud treated with 10 months of physical therapy, which included exercise, massage, electrical stimulation and hot and cold packs. Following November 2015, no further treatment was rendered for Firoud's cervical and lumbar spine.
In 2015, Firoud treated with psychological counseling for her complaints of emotional distress. She was diagnosed with post-traumatic distress disorder. No further treatment was administered, and she sought to recover $1,572 in medical costs.
In a report, Firoud's orthopedic surgeon causally related her injuries and treatment to the accident and determined that she had suffered a serious impairment of functionality. The parties agreed to try the case pursuant to Pennsylvania Rule of Civil Procedure 1311.1. Under the rule, a verdict is capped at $25,000, and expert-witness reports are submitted into evidence instead of live testimony by the experts.
Firoud's psychologist opined that the trauma from being in the vehicle accident caused her to experience stress and anxiety, ultimately resulting in post-traumatic stress disorder.
Firoud testified that she continues to experience pain in her neck and low back. This causes her difficulty lifting heavy objects at work and performing chores around the house, including vacuuming and cleaning. Firoud testified that she also suffers from anxiety, especially when driving, and that she is not as intimate with her husband. She also experiences moodiness and lethargy. She sought damages for past and future pain and suffering. Her husband had withdrawn his claim for loss of consortium, prior to trial.
The defense counsel's expert in radiology determined that Firoud's imaging studies showed no evidence of a traumatic injury, and that only pre-existing degenerative changes were present.
Carr's counsel cited Firoud's medical records, which showed that she had been diagnosed with prior cervical and lumbar herniations, radiculopathy, depression and anxiety. Counsel also noted that she had been in prior vehicle accidents in 2005, 2009, 2010 and 2012, and that her orthopedic surgeon and another medical provider had previously determined that she had suffered permanent injuries from the accidents.
The jury rendered a defense verdict. It found that Carr was not liable for Firoud's injuries
—This report first appeared in VerdictSearch, an ALM publication.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFederal Judge Allows Elderly Woman's Consumer Protection Suit to Proceed Against Citizens Bank
5 minute readJudge Leaves Statute of Limitations Question in Injury Crash Suit for a Jury
4 minute readSupreme Court's Ruling in 'Students for Fair Admissions' and Its Impact on DEI Initiatives in the Workplace
6 minute readMembership Has Its Privileges: Bankruptcy Court Examines LLC's Authority to File Bankruptcy
8 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250