Mexican National Given Bond Hearing After Waiting 2 Years in County Lockup
A federal judge has ruled that a Mexican national who was taken into custody for deportation and kept in a cell for nearly two years is entitled to a bond hearing.
August 09, 2018 at 06:20 PM
3 minute read
A federal judge has ruled that a Mexican national who was taken into custody for deportation and kept in a cell for nearly two years is entitled to a bond hearing.
Juan Vega was arrested and served time for drug trafficking and served a yearlong prison sentence. In November 2016, he was taken into custody by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and put in a York County prison where he stayed for 21 months awaiting removal proceedings.
Vega in court filings claimed that he was subjected to an unconstitutionally long stay in prison and had been denied due process rights by having the bond hearing put off for so long.
U.S. District Judge Malachy Mannion of the Middle District of Pennsylvania, adopting the findings of his colleague U.S. Magistrate Judge Karoline Mehalchick, ruled in favor of Vega. An important issue in the case was also whether the amount of marijuana Vega sold—50 pounds—was enough to be considered an aggravated felony, which would weigh in favor of hastened deportation.
While the warden of the prison argued that Vega was trying to delay the inevitable, Mannion said, “petitioner Vega did not request multiple continuances during his removal proceedings. Nor does the court find that any delay in petitioner Vega's removal proceedings are attributable to him. In fact, it does not appear that either party has caused any delays in the removal proceedings.
“Rather, the delay in the petitioner's removal proceedings appears to be resolving the difficult question of whether the petitioner's conviction … constitutes an aggravated felony making him ineligible for cancellation of removal,” Mannion continued. “The court does not find that the petitioner is filing frivolous appeals. All of the briefs in the petitioner's current appeal with the Third Circuit have not yet been filed and, there is no way to know how long his appeal will be pending. As stated, the Third Circuit granted the petitioner a temporary stay of removal.”
Mannion added, “Thus, the facts that the petitioner's removal is not imminent and he has asserted a valid defense to his removal coupled with the fact of the length of his detention weigh in favor of the court's finding that his continued detention is unreasonable, and unconstitutional, as applied to him, entitling him to a bond hearing. Indeed, it is relevant that petitioner Vega's detention for almost two years in [York County Prison] is comparable to a considerable prison sentence even though he was not convicted of any new crimes”
John J. Buckley III of Norris McLaughlin & Marcus in Allentown represents Vega and did not return a call seeking comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All3rd Circuit Strikes Down NLRB’s Monetary Remedies for Fired Starbucks Workers
Middle District of Pennsylvania's U.S. Attorney Announces Resignation
2 minute readJudicial Appointments After Casey: Observers Wary but Hopeful Bipartisan Spirit Will Continue
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250