As Sexual Abuse Scandals Mount, DC Cardinal Turns to Jones Day
Cardinal Donald Wuerl, leader of the Catholic Church in Washington and former Pittsburgh bishop, looked to the law firm amid fallout from this week's Pennsylvania grand jury report.
August 15, 2018 at 06:23 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on National Law Journal
Cardinal Donald Wuerl, leader of the Catholic Church in Washington, has tapped Jones Day for legal advice on matters relating to a Pennsylvania grand jury report documenting thousands of child sexual assault victims at Catholic dioceses in Pennsylvania.
The highly anticipated grand jury report puts blame on Wuerl, former bishop of his native Pittsburgh for 18 years, for failing to remove abusive priests from their public ministry and concealing information when allegations against some priests were made to law enforcement officials. The report stated more than 300 priests were responsible for the alleged abuse.
In response to Tuesday's report, Wuerl issued a statement saying that he, “continue[s] to offer my apologies, my prayers, and my resolve that I will use whatever power I may have to ensure that no children will suffer because of those whom they are trusted for care and guidance.”
“While I served as Bishop of Pittsburgh, and as our understanding of child sexual abuse increased, the Diocese worked to strengthen our response and repeatedly amended the Diocese's safeguards and policies,” Wuerl wrote. “The Diocese worked to meet or exceed the requirements of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops and the reporting requirements of Pennsylvania law.”
In confirming Jones Day's representation of Wuerl on issues involving the grand jury, Wuerl spokesman Ed McFadden added that Jones Day had previously represented the cardinal on other matters. The firm worked with the Archdiocese of Washington general counsel Kim Viti Fiorentino on a settlement relating to Zubik v. Burwell, which involved the U.S. Health and Human Services Department's mandate for employers to provide contraceptives under the Affordable Care Act that the Catholic Church found morally objectionable.
The lawyers now representing Wuerl were not immediately made known, but in prior matters involving the Archbishop of Washington the Catholic Church has turned to Jones Day partners Eric Dreiband and David Raimer, and then-partner Noel Francisco, now serving as U.S. solicitor general. Francisco was part of the Jones Day team representing the Catholic Church's challenge to the ACA.
In Pennsylvania, Jones Day partner John Goetz has been an active board member of Catholic Charities of Pittsburgh and has worked on a pro bono project seeking to advance Wuerl's plans for a free health care clinic in downtown Pittsburgh.
Fiorentino, Wuerl's in-house lawyer, has attacked the Pennsylvania grand jury report and its depiction of Wuerl. In an interview with her archdiocese's weekly newspaper published Tuesday, Fiorentino said the investigatory process and resulting report, “narrowly targeted the Catholic Church in six dioceses in Pennsylvania and was generated in a process that suffered from significant legal flaws.”
“In short, it's clear that then-Bishop Wuerl acted decisively to protect young people,” Fiorentino said in the interview. “The reader of the report gets a different, far more negative view.”
The Archdiocese of Washington also set up a website, TheWuerlRecord.com, to rebut the grand jury report. As of Wednesday afternoon, TheWuerlRecord.com now redirects to a page on the archdiocese's website featuring Wuerl's statement and a post by his spokesman criticizing Pennsylvania's attorney general. The website previously hosted an image of a smiling Wuerl alongside a statement from him and a timeline detailing Wuerl's “child protection efforts.”
As Wuerl and his legal team look to navigate the challenges posed by his record in Pittsburgh, the cardinal has also faced scrutiny for his response to scandals much closer to home in Washington.
After Theodore McCarrick, Wuerl's predecessor in Washington, resigned last month from the College of Cardinals because of sexual abuse allegations against him spanning several decades, Wuerl said, “I don't think this is some massive, massive crisis.” He later walked back those remarks in interviews with Catholic media and has reiterated his shock at learning of the allegations that his predecessor was a sexual predator.
Jones Day did not provide comment for this article.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllImmunity for Mental Health Care and Coverage for CBD: What's on the Pa. High Court's November Calendar
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Why Kramer Levin Decided to Merge
- 2Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-61
- 3Decision of the Day: School District's Probe Was a 'Sham'; Title IX Administrator Showed Sex-Based Bias
- 4US Magistrate Judge Embry Kidd Confirmed to 11th Circuit
- 5Shaq Signs $11 Million Settlement to Resolve Astrals Investor Claims
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250