Recently Retired Phila. Commerce Court Judge Heads to ADR
After nearly 25 years on the bench handling numerous high-profile cases and becoming a part of the court's leadership, McInerney is gearing up to take that expertise to JAMS where she will do private alternative dispute resolution.
August 15, 2018 at 02:47 PM
5 minute read
When the first supervising judge of Philadelphia's Commerce Court was initially assigned to handle the city's biggest business disputes, she did not want the job.
“I was very happy doing my med mals and my products cases,” former Philadelphia Judge Patricia McInerney said during a recent interview. “But it turned out to be a very good assignment, and I very much enjoyed my time in Commerce.”
Now, after nearly 25 years on the bench handling numerous high-profile cases and becoming a part of the court's leadership, McInerney is gearing up to take that expertise to JAMS where she will do private alternative dispute resolution. She said she expects to handle a wide range of disputes, but may emphasize business issues, given her familiarity with the topic and attorneys that practice in that space.
“I'm hoping to see a lot of the lawyers I worked with in Commerce. … I'm a known quantity,” McInerney said.
McInerney was elected to the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas in 1995, and stepped down from the bench June 30. She is planning to join JAMS in September.
Since stepping down, Judge Nina Wright Padilla has joined the Commerce Court, and Judge Gary Glazer has taken over supervising the court.
Before becoming a judge, McInerney worked as a public defender and then a civil litigator, handling employment, civil rights, premises liability and other general liability disputes. While working as a lawyer, she began participating in the First Judicial District's program that allows attorneys to act as arbitrators in cases involving less than $50,000, and then decided to run for a judgeship.
“I was in front of a lot of judges, and I just thought it was important that everyone get a fair trial and be treated fairly, and I thought I could do a good job at it,” she said.
McInerney began in the trial division, handling major criminal and civil trials. In 2011, after the death of Judge Albert W. Sheppard, she was assigned to take his place as the Commerce Court leader. Sheppard had been one of the founders of the court, and McInerney said that at first she was not enthusiastic about the post.
However, she soon found that the pace and complexity of the matters she was hearing suited her. She said she also enjoyed having an individual case calendar, so she could handle each case from start to finish, rather than handle individual motions, hearings, or trials, as often happens in the criminal and civil divisions.
“You have to be a little bit geeky to be in Commerce. There are more legal issues, and it's fun to toss those around,” she said. “You get to know the cases better, and you get to know the lawyers better.”
After taking over in the Commerce Court, McInerney has handled numerous high-profile, high-dollar-amount disputes, including fights involving law firms, a dispute about whether Pennsylvania could recoup more than $120 million in tobacco settlement funds, and legal battles involving some of Philadelphia's most well-known entities.
McInerney said one of the most memorable cases she handled involved the closely watched dispute between owners of The Philadelphia Inquirer about whether Bill Marimow, the top editor of the paper, should have been fired in 2013. McInerney ultimately determined a few months after the firing that Marimow should not have been dismissed, but the feud between various factions with ownership stakes in the company continued. The dispute ended after co-owner Lewis Katz, who had backed Marimow, bought out the other co-owners for $88 million. Katz died just days later in a plane crash.
“It was a very hotly contested case,” McInerney said. “It was very important to me at the time, because the paper means a lot to the people of Philadelphia. It was important to me that the case get resolved quickly and properly, and that the paper survive.”
In 2016, when Judge Jacqueline Allen took over as the FJD's administrative judge, McInerney was made the first supervising judge of the Commerce Court. While the change was largely in title only, McInerney said, it was also meant to reflect that the Commerce Court was a separate entity within the broader court system with its own administrative needs.
With McInerney heading Commerce Court, Allen heading the FJD as administrative judge, Judge Sheila Woods-Skipper overseeing the court as president judge, and Judge Idee Fox being tapped as supervising judge of the civil trial division, McInerney was part of a wave of women who took over court leadership in 2016.
The transition, McInerney said, was part of the major changes she's seen within the court since taking the bench.
“We've had a lot more women and people of color on the bench,” she said. “We have a long way to go in Philadelphia, but certainly, we've had really big changes.”
McInerney said there was a natural progression from serving on Commerce Court to becoming an arbitrator. While heading the court, she helped hammer out numerous settlements, and became familiar with other mediators, including retired federal magistrate Judge Diane Welsh, who, McInerney said, was a bit of a mentor and helped get her interested in ADR.
McInerney said that, whether as a judge or a litigator, she has always enjoyed being in court, but since stepping down from the bench, she has taken the summer off, spending much of it on Cape Cod.
“I've been off this summer enjoying myself,” she said. “It's the first time having the summer off since I was a kid.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPlaintiffs Seek Redo of First Trial Over Medical Device Plant's Emissions
4 minute readRemembering Am Law 100 Firm Founder and 'Force of Nature' Stephen Cozen
5 minute readEckert Seamans Snags Reed Smith Global Financial Intelligence Director
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250