Deep Data Visualization Key to Unlocking Meaning in E-Discovery
Want to understand which pieces of data really matter? It's time to ditch the pie charts and bar graphs.
August 16, 2018 at 02:51 PM
5 minute read
Data is the basic building block of analytical exploration. It tells a story—in an infinite amount of ways. But how do we read the story? How do we choose what chapters to focus on and where to look for clues?
For e-discovery professionals trying to take a massive heap of data and find the 25 documents that are important, this can be an especially painful challenge. The ESI in a matter come in so many different forms and are related in any number of ways, seeing meaning can be near impossible with existing data visualization methods.
The Problem With Basic Data Visualization
Emails, pictures, audio files—all of it is data. But the way we organize it and interact with it can either give us limited or unlimited insight. How we understand data is impacted by what we see. Visual cues quickly allow our brands to focus on one thing or filter out other things.
We're in a never-ending cycle of trying to interpret data and glean information, but this requires us to see the data from different perspectives. While advances in technology have resulted in crucial gains related to speed and intake volume, human intelligence is still inarguably an essential element of understanding the intelligence behind the data.
Luckily, we have this amazing thing called vision. Out of all our senses, it collects and processes the most amount of data, giving us a better view—literally—of the world around us. Studies in UX and how various design aspects are processed by our brain are also allowing us to better express information in a way that unlocks new understanding.
Leveraging both technology and our own power to understand can help reveal data intelligence faster and with more accuracy than any AI-only or human-only process. AI can be enhanced with successful data visualization. For example, AI training models can be created by selecting a group of items that were determined to be relational based on manual data visualization. Or, basic AI insights can be presented for final review and assessment in a way that is visually meaningful to the users.
What Does Successful Data Visualization Look Like?
The ultimate goal of data visualization is this: to gain insight.
Seeing the data in a way that imparts meaning is only half of the equation. The other half is the ability to navigate into the data being shown. If Google Maps didn't have a zoom feature, for example, it would be essentially useless.
Navigating the data means the ability to dive in deeper and select groups of data items or relational dimensions, or focus on particular sections of the data at any given moment. To choose some things and filter other things out. Like turning the knobs on a microscope or a telescope until the intelligence comes into focus.
Let's take a look at a few examples of different ways to present data that could reveal new insight.
- Thread arc.
Now imagine seeing parent/child relationship (arcs) + chronology (x-axis) + variable A (color) + variable B (distance between dots) all at once. If you have a long list of email threads, with a thread arc, you can cross reference 10 to 20 at any given moment just by using your eyes.
- Treemap.
This represents a dataset of parent/children relations. So, for example, you have tags on certain folders and documents, that can be used to create a quantitative relationship. That score can now be used to show the folders with the most relevant documents as larger as compared to smaller folders which would represent less of a relational similarity. Size can represent whatever the score is, for example by the amount of bytes each folder takes up, in this case size is just the relation.
- Circle-packing.
This visualizes the same, hierarchical data structure, but shows how items are nested with a different positioning algorithm.
While pie charts and bar graphs have their place—dashboards and as elements of a larger, more detailed chart, for example—it is helpful when working with big data to break away from relying solely on these simple constructs otherwise, we are severely limiting what kind of insight we can gain from the data.
The vast majority of e-discovery solutions force you to choose from a limited selection of typical charts, but real insight and efficiency requires flexibility. The flexibility to use more than just an x-axis and a y-axis. The flexibility to use color, texture, shape, orientation, size and nesting to indicate relationships between your data—and literally see meaning. The flexibility to discover something different.
As data grows exponentially, and firms and corporate teams are required to gain better insight from more data faster, the freedom to access custom visualizations for unique use cases during the discovery process will change the way we do e-discovery.
Jonathan Snyder serves as UI/UX lead for LegalRadius, a ONE Discovery software solution, where he manages all conceptualization and design within the software application.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBest Practices for Conducting Workplace Investigations: A Legal and HR Perspective
9 minute readPlaintiff Argues Jury's $22M Punitive Damages Finding Undermines J&J's Talc Trial Win
4 minute readPa. High Court: Concrete Proof Not Needed to Weigh Grounds for Preliminary Injunction Order
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1No Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
- 2Poop-Themed Dog Toy OK as Parody, but Still Tarnished Jack Daniel’s Brand, Court Says
- 3Meet the New President of NY's Association of Trial Court Jurists
- 4Lawyers' Phones Are Ringing: What Should Employers Do If ICE Raids Their Business?
- 5Freshfields Hires Ex-SEC Corporate Finance Director in Silicon Valley
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250