As It Prepares to Close, New Jersey Foreclosure Firm Sued for Ad Fees
Udren Law, unable to pay for legal advertisements, appears to be winding down its business.
August 23, 2018 at 05:57 PM
3 minute read
A New Jersey foreclosure firm, which appears to be closing, has been accused of refusing to pay advertising fees for foreclosure notices since January, racking up debts in the six figures.
Mansfield Advertising is suing the Udren Law Offices in Cherry Hill, New Jersey, for more than $139,000 in unpaid legal advertising fees. Udren Law represents lenders and mortgage servicers on real estate matters in Florida, New Jersey and Pennsylvania, according to its website.
In its complaint, Mansfield claimed that Udren Law has said it is in the process of winding down, “and thus cannot provide guidance as to when, or if, it will pay the invoices.”
Mark Udren did not respond to requests for comment about the complaint and his firm's closure. An employee reached at Udren Law's main number confirmed that the firm is in the process of winding down, but gave no additional details.
Mansfield, which is based in Wayne, Pennsylvania, attached the 86 unpaid invoices, all dated between Jan. 26 and Aug. 20 of this year, to its complaint. The plaintiff lists fees for ads in a number of publications around Pennsylvania, including several in The Legal Intelligencer.
Mansfield is bringing breach of contract and unjust enrichment charges in its complaint, filed Wednesday in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.
Udren Law found itself at the center of an appellate issue years ago that did not end in its favor. The Pennsylvania Supreme Court held that law firms can be found liable to a borrower for excessive attorney fees charged in violation of the Pennsylvania Loan Interest and Protection Law.
Plaintiff Mary Glover had alleged that Udren Law charged unearned and excessive fees in connection with her mortgage foreclosure proceedings in Pennsylvania. Plaintiffs EdElla and Eric Johnson had filed similar claims against Phelan Hallinan & Schmieg, and both cases were heard together before Pennsylvania's highest court.
The Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas and Pennsylvania Superior Court had decided in the law firms' favor. But amici curiae in the case, chiming in on Glover's and the Johnsons' behalf, had argued that under that interpretation, residential mortgage lenders would too easily be able to evade debt collection and foreclosure regulations by hiring attorneys.
Foreclosure firms throughout the country have found themselves in a challenging climate in recent years, as regulations on mortgage foreclosures and debt collection stiffened. That has resulted in a wave of foreclosure firm closures, including New Jersey's Zucker, Goldberg & Ackerman, whose bankruptcy plan was approved late last year.
READ MORE:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPhila. Med Mal Lawyers In for Busy Year as Court Adjusts for Filing Boom
3 minute read'Recover, Reflect, Retool and Retry': Lessons From Women Atop Pa. Legal Community
3 minute readEDPA's New Chief Judge Plans to Advance Efforts to Combat Threats to Judiciary
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Lawyer as Whistleblower? Associate Sues Firm
- 2New Class Action Points to Fears Over Privacy, Abortions and Fertility
- 3Ex-Big Law Attorney Disbarred for Defrauding $1 Million of Client Money
- 4'New Circumstances': Winston & Strawn Seek Expedited Relief in NASCAR Antitrust Lawsuit
- 5Productivity Suite Startup Macro Announces $12 Million Funding Round
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250