Motorcyclist Asserted Improper Turn by Car Precipitated Collision
On July 27, 2016, plaintiff Michael Solow, 75, was riding a motorcycle on Pennsylvania Avenue, in Fort Washington, when he was struck by a sedan. He suffered injuries to his left leg.
August 30, 2018 at 02:29 PM
4 minute read
Solow v. Park Avenue Motor Cars Fort Washington
$1 Million Settlement
Date of Verdict: July 13.
Court and Case No.: C.P. Philadelphia No. 170901258.
Type of Action: Motor vehicle.
Injuries: Leg, ankle fractures.
Plaintiffs Counsel: Anthony J. Baratta, Baratta, Russell & Baratta, Huntingdon Valley.
Plaintiffs Experts: Dr. Guy W. Fried, physical medicine, Philadelphia; Alex Karras, life care planning; Jamison; Dr. Howard S. Caplan, plastic surgery/reconstructive surgery, Philadelphia.
Defense Counsel: Robert J. Siegel, Campbell, Lipski & Dochney, Philadelphia.
Comment:
On July 27, 2016, plaintiff Michael Solow, 75, was riding a motorcycle on Pennsylvania Avenue, in Fort Washington, when he was struck by a sedan. He suffered injuries to his left leg.
Solow sued the car driver, Robert Sligh II, alleging negligence. He also sued Sligh's employer, Park Avenue Motor Cars Fort Washington, because Sligh had been in the course of his employment at the time of the accident.
Prior to the collision, Solow had left a car wash and attempted to turn left, onto the two eastbound lanes of Pennsylvania Avenue. In order to do so, he had to cross the road's two westbound lanes. As he attempted to make the turn, his motorcycle was struck on the side by the front driver's side of Sligh's car. Solow was thrown into the road.
Prior to the accident, Sligh had exited a business across from the car wash intending to turn onto westbound Pennsylvania Avenue. As he attempted to turn left, he struck Solow.
According to Solow's counsel, Sligh had been looking to his right for oncoming westbound traffic when the collision occurred.
Sligh's counsel maintained that both motorists were liable for the accident.
Solow was taken by ambulance to a hospital, where he was admitted and diagnosed with an open distal fibula fracture of his left leg, in which the bone protruded through the skin.
In the ensuing days, Solow remained hospitalized and had multiple debridements and irrigation procedures to treat dead skin. He then had open reduction and internal fixation surgery, in which a rod and screws were implanted.
Upon discharge, Solow remained non-weight-bearing. He consulted with his surgeon during the following weeks. Eventually, he had a course of physical therapy, consisting of exercise, and he treated with a bone stimulator to promote union along the dominant fracture line, which was successful.
Solow also consulted with a plastic surgeon for wound-closure difficulties. At the time of settlement, Solow continued to consult with his orthopedic and plastic surgeons. He sought to recover a Medicare lien of $75,000.
Solow's experts in physical medicine and plastic surgery outlined his injuries and treatment. According to Solow's expert in life-care planning, he would require future treatment, including annual visits with a wound specialist and orthopedic, plastic and vascular surgeons; physical therapy; nerve-conduction studies; imaging studies of his leg; pain medications; a scooter for ambulatory purposes; and a possible skin graft. Solow sought to recover $175,000 in future medical costs.
Solow testified that he continues to experience pain, swelling and occasional oozing at the surgical site. He said that he is unable to walk long distances. He sought to recover damages for past and future pain and suffering.
The case settled before Sligh's counsel offered a defense to Solow's claims of injuries and treatment.
The parties negotiated a pre-trial settlement. Park Avenue Motor Cars Fort Washington LP's insurer agreed to pay a total of $1 million.
The insurer tendered the company's primary policy, which provided $500,000 of coverage, and also agreed to pay $500,000 from an excess policy, which provided $15 million of coverage.
This report is based on information that was provided by plaintiffs counsel. Defense counsel did not respond to calls for comment.
—This report first appeared in VerdictSearch, an ALM publication.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllImmunity for Mental Health Care and Coverage for CBD: What's on the Pa. High Court's November Calendar
5 minute readRule 126(b) Citations to Unpublished Opinions: Some of Us Still Don’t Get It
6 minute readProposed 'Bulk Sensitive Personal Data' Rule and the DOJ’s Comprehensive National Security Regulations
7 minute readThe Importance of Plaintiffs Not Letting Defendants Dictate Settlement Tax Strategies
9 minute readTrending Stories
- 1How I Made Partner: 'Develop a Practice Area You Really Care About ,' Says Jennifer Gniady of Stradley Ronon
- 2Indian Billionaire Gautam Adani Indicted in Brooklyn for Alleged Orchestration of $250 Million Bribery Plot
- 3Eagle Pharma Founder Sues Company to Recoup Cost of SEC Investigation
- 4GC Conference Takeaways: Picking AI Vendors 'a Bit of a Crap Shoot,' Beware of Internal Investigation 'Scope Creep'
- 5Legal Events for Georgia Lawyers
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250