Law Firm Breakup Dispute Headed to Arbitration
A dispute over Williams Cuker Berezofsky is set to go before a panel of arbitrators in November.
September 10, 2018 at 06:14 PM
3 minute read
A dispute over a local litigation firm's breakup is heading to arbitration in November.
Former law partners Mark Cuker and Esther Berezofsky have agreed on a panel of arbitrators to handle their case, which Cuker filed in Philadelphia court in May. The case was transferred to the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania in June, and Berezofsky filed a motion to compel arbitration.
Cuker and Berezofsky were partners at Williams Cuker Berezofsky from 2000 to 2017, Cuker's complaint said, along with Gerald Williams. The firm broke up last September, and each of its name partners have either founded or affiliated with new firms.
Cuker has alleged that Berezofsky breached the dissolution agreement with regard to disbursements from the dissolved firm's operating account, and with regard to co-counsel arrangements agreed to in the dissolution process.
New Jersey lawyer Carlo Scaramella, who is representing Berezofsky, said the complaint includes “mischaracterizations and misstatements,” and should not have been filed in court in the first place. “The matter is being vigorously contested in the arbitration,” he said.
According to the complaint, Williams Cuker Berezofsky exhausted its credit line in January 2017 and lacked adequate cash flow to continue operating without employee layoffs or partner contributions. Cuker and Williams contributed $300,000 between the two of them, the complaint said, but Berezofsky did not. Instead, Cuker alleged, Berezofsky continued to take a $4,000 weekly draw, for a total of about $80,000 during that period.
Ultimately, the partners chose to dissolve the firm, and executed a dissolution agreement in September. That agreement included provisions for the amounts each partner should be paid, the complaint said, based on their contributions, which was over $181,000 for Williams, over $143,000 for Cuker, and just under $8,800 for Berezofsky.
Cuker has alleged that Berezofsky violated the dissolution agreement by refusing to authorize Cuker's and Williams' disbursements. Cuker also alleged that Berezofsky misappropriated fees from medical device settlement claims that came in after the dissolution.
Additionally, Cuker alleged that Berezofsky excluded Cuker from a class action related to water contamination in Flint, Michigan, when the dissolution agreement said they would serve as co-counsel in that litigation.
The parties filed a joint report Sept. 7, which said their arbitration is scheduled for the week of Nov. 13. The three-arbitrator panel consists of lawyer Angelo Scaricamazza, retired Pennsylvania Superior Court Judge Richard Klein and retired Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas Judge Sandra Mazer Moss.
Cuker is representing himself in the case. He did not return a call seeking comment Monday.
READ MORE:
Litigation Shop Williams Cuker Berezofsky Breaks Up
Ex-Williams Cuker Berezofsky Name Partner Forms Another Spinoff
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPhila. Med Mal Lawyers In for Busy Year as Court Adjusts for Filing Boom
3 minute read'Recover, Reflect, Retool and Retry': Lessons From Women Atop Pa. Legal Community
3 minute readEDPA's New Chief Judge Plans to Advance Efforts to Combat Threats to Judiciary
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250