Court: Contractor's Alleged Removal of Stop Sign May Have Led to Crash
A three-judge panel ruled 2-1 to reverse a Luzerne County trial judge's grant of summary judgment to defendant Pennsy Supply.
September 13, 2018 at 11:34 AM
4 minute read
A split Pennsylvania Superior Court panel has ruled that it must be left to a jury to determine whether a construction company's alleged removal of a stop sign while working on a sidewalk near an intersection played a key role in causing a crash.
A three-judge panel ruled 2-1 in Estate of Jeff S. Hine v. Pennsy Supply to reverse a Luzerne County trial judge's grant of summary judgment to defendant Pennsy Supply.
According to the court's opinion, Jeff Hine, who has since died of apparently unrelated causes, was injured in a motor vehicle accident with defendant Michelle Dulay at an intersection in Wilkes-Barre. Hine and his wife sued Dulay, alleging she was at fault for driving through the intersection without yielding to Hine, who had the right of way. The Hines also named Pennsy as a defendant, alleging the construction company was liable for either removing or allowing the removal of the stop sign that was normally at the intersection while it worked on the sidewalk.
The Hines and Dulay ultimately reached a settlement, leaving Pennsy as the sole defendant.
Pennsy argued that there was no evidence that it removed the stop sign from the intersection. The company also denied that it had a duty to erect or maintain a stop sign at that location.
While a trial judge agreed, Superior Court Judge Judith Ference Olson, writing for the majority, said there existed a genuine issue of material fact regarding whether Pennsy was negligent for either removing or allowing the removal of the stop sign.
Olson, joined by Judge Jack Panella, noted that Pennsy was the prime contractor on the sidewalk project and that Wilkes-Barre City Police Sergeant Thomas Harding wrote in his accident report that the stop sign had been removed from the intersection and had not been reposted at the time of the crash. Attilio “Butch” Frati, the director of operations for Wilkes-Barre, also testified that he “would not dispute” Harding's statement.
Meanwhile, the majority also noted, Pennsy employees David Tavaris and David Kuniega Sr. agreed that a contractor may not remove a sign without proper authorization. Tavaris testified that doing so would be “unsafe” and Kuniega testified that it would be “reckless” for a contractor to take down a stop sign and then leave for the day, according to Olson.
“This evidence alone is sufficient to defeat Pennsy's summary judgment motion, given the evidence also demonstrates that Pennsy did not have permission to remove the stop sign at the intersection and that removing a stop sign to create an uncontrolled intersection is unreasonably dangerous,” Olson said.
But Justice Correale Stevens filed a dissenting memorandum, arguing that nothing in the summary judgment record indicated that Pennsy removed the stop sign or that it had a duty to erect or maintain a sign at the intersection. Stevens also noted that the trial court had found that, even if the stop sign had been improperly removed, Dulay's failure to obey the rules of the road was the proximate cause of Hine's injuries.
“The record supports the court's conclusion: Ms. Dulay stated during depositions that she was familiar with the requirement to stop at intersections and to yield right-of-way to traffic already traveling on a road she was approaching,” Stevens said. ”She admitted she did not stop at the intersection in question.”
Counsel for Hine's estate, Gregory Fellerman of Fellerman & Ciarimboli in Kingston, did not return a call seeking comment.
Pennsy's attorney, Mark Bufalino of Elliott Greenleaf in Wilkes-Barre, said he and his client maintain that Pennsy did not remove the stop sign and that the record contains no evidence that it did.
Bufalino said the stop sign in question was located in the grass 15 feet before the area in which Pennsy was working so there would have been no need to remove it.
(Copies of the 21-page opinion in Estate of Hine v. Pennsy Supply, PICS No. 18-1114, are available at http://at.law.com/PICS.)
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllJudge Tanks Prevailing Pittsburgh Attorneys' $2.45M Fee Request to $250K
5 minute readBest Practices for Conducting Workplace Investigations: A Legal and HR Perspective
9 minute readPlaintiff Argues Jury's $22M Punitive Damages Finding Undermines J&J's Talc Trial Win
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Greenberg Traurig Launches Munich Office with Eight Hires, Including McDermott Group
- 2Midlevel Appellate Court Reinstates New York's Voting Rights Act
- 3Consumer Protection Suit Cleared to Go Forward Against Irritating Eye Serum
- 4COVID-19 Was Still Relevant in Securities Class Actions During 2024, Report Says
- 5After Botched Landing of United Airlines Boeing 767, Unlikely Plaintiff Sues Carrier
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250