Motorist Did Not Suffer a Serious Impairment, Defense Argued
On Sept. 29, 2014, plaintiff Nicole Johnson, 42, a program manager, was driving on Easton Road, in Willow Grove, when her sedan was sideswiped on the driver's side by a pickup truck. She claimed multiple permanent injuries.
September 13, 2018 at 01:48 PM
4 minute read
Johnson v. Keogh
Defense Verdict
Date of Verdict: July 26.
Court and Case No.: C.P. Montgomery No. 2016-23461
Judge: Thomas P. Rogers.
Type of Action: Motor vehicle.
Injuries: Elbow, back and wrist injuries.
Plaintiffs Counsel: Dominic A. Speziali, J. Fine Law, Philadelphia.
Defense Counsel: Jessica Smeriglio, Goldberg, Miller & Rubin, Philadelphia.
Defense Expert: Dr. Leonard A. Brody, orthopedic surgery, Southampton.
Comment:
On Sept. 29, 2014, plaintiff Nicole Johnson, 42, a program manager, was driving on Easton Road, in Willow Grove, when her sedan was sideswiped on the driver's side by a pickup truck. She claimed multiple permanent injuries.
Johnson sued the other driver, Daniel Keogh, alleging that he was negligent.
Keogh stipulated to negligence, and the case was tried on the issues of causation and damages.
The day after the accident, Johnson, complaining of pain to her right elbow, presented to an emergency room, where an X-ray was negative. A week later, she presented to a chiropractor with complaints of continued pain to her elbow and also to her right shoulder and wrist. She further said she had pain to her neck and low back. From Oct. 6 to Nov. 20, she treated with massage and spinal manipulation.
After an MRI of her right arm, Johnson was diagnosed with sprains and strains of her right wrist, shoulder and elbow, with mild tendinosis and degenerative changes in her right elbow. She was also diagnosed with sprains and strains of her cervical, thoracic and lumbar spine. During treatment, she presented to a pain-management specialist and received a trigger-point injection to her right trapezius muscle.
A few months post-accident, Johnson was diagnosed with plantar fasciitis to her left heel. In early 2015, she was fitted with an elbow strap, which she wore for a few months. In August 2015, she returned to her chiropractor with ongoing complaints, and she treated with two visits.
Her next course of treatment was not until January 2017, when she received an epidural injection of a steroid-based painkiller to her lumbar spine. In March, she resumed chiropractic care with a different physician, through June. At that time, she complained of ongoing pain in her right elbow, wrist, shoulder, heel and to her spine, in addition to numbness and tingling in her legs.
An MRI of Johnson's lumbar spine showed degenerative changes and disc protrusions. She was diagnosed with an aggravation of a pre-existing condition. In April 2017, Johnson treated with four sessions of physical therapy. In December 2017, she received an epidural injection to her lumbar spine, and in February 2018, a cortisone injection was administered to her left heel. No further treatment was rendered.
Johnson's counsel cited her medical records to argue that she suffered a serious impairment of a bodily function. The parties agreed to try the case pursuant to Pennsylvania Rule of Civil Procedure 1311.1. Under the rule, a verdict is capped at $25,000, and expert-witness reports are submitted into evidence instead of live testimony by the expert witnesses.
Johnson said that she continued to experience pain and a decreased range of motion at her right elbow, wrist, shoulder, neck, and upper and lower back. She stated that, prior to the accident, she had regarded herself as a “G.I. Jane,” since she was military veteran and led a physically active lifestyle that included running long distances. Due to her injuries, however, she was no longer physically active, she testified. She sought damages for past and future pain and suffering.
Counsel for Keogh denied Johnson's claimed injuries, pointing out her gaps in treatment. Additionally, Johnson had been in a fall in March 2016, and her resumed treatment in 2017 was mostly likely due to the fall, counsel asserted.
The defense's expert in orthopedic surgery, who examined Johnson, concluded in a report that she had not suffered injury from the accident, and any injury she might have sustained would have been soft-tissue in nature and resolved within weeks.
The jury rendered a defense verdict, finding that Keogh's negligence caused Johnson's injury, but that Johnson did not suffer a serious impairment of a bodily function.
This report is based on information that was provided by defense counsel. Plaintiffs counsel did not respond to calls for comment.
—This report first appeared in VerdictSearch, an ALM publication
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Invoking Trump, AG Bonta Reminds Lawyers of Duties to Noncitizens in Plea Dealing
- 222-Count Indictment Is Just the Start of SCOTUSBlog Atty's Legal Problems, Experts Say
- 3Judge Rejects Walgreens' Contractual Dispute Against Founder's Family Member
- 4FTC Sues PepsiCo for Alleged Price Break to Big-Box Retailer, Incurs Holyoak's Wrath
- 5Greenberg Traurig Litigation Co-Chair Returning After Three Years as US Attorney
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250