Fatal Crane Crush Accident Resolved in $6.5M Settlement
The family of a man who was killed when a crane jib weighing more than 2,500 pounds fell on him have settled their claims against several construction companies for $6.5 million.
September 14, 2018 at 02:47 PM
4 minute read
The family of a man who was killed when a crane jib weighing more than 2,500 pounds fell on him have settled their claims against several construction companies for $6.5 million.
The case, Chipps v. Maxim Crane Works, which had been filed in the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas, involved the family of Jerod Chapman, who was 29 years old when he was fatally crushed in 2015. The parties settled the case during mediation before retired Judge James Melinson on Sept. 11.
According to the plaintiffs' mediation memo, Chapman had been part of a construction team working on a building on Penn State's main campus. At the end of the day on June 12, 2015, Chapman volunteered to help a crane operator employed by defendant Maxim Crane Works to dismantle the crane boom and jib so it could be stored. However, during the process, the crane jib fell onto Chapman's head, fatally crushing him.
Saltz Mongeluzzi Barrett & Bendesky attorney David Kwass, who, along with Adam Pantano, represented the plaintiffs, said the possible recovery in the case was somewhat limited, given how quickly the death occurred and because Chapman did not have any children, although he was engaged to be married to a woman with a daughter with whom he was close.
“We see this as an excellent result for our client,” he said.
Kwass and Pantano also said the case largely centered on testimony of the fact witnesses, including the crane operator and Maxim's vice president of safety, who both said that failing to ensure the jib is properly secured before removing pins connecting the jib to the boom is “unacceptable,” according to the attorneys.
According to the plaintiffs' memo, the crane fell because the crane operator told workers to remove pins connecting the jib to the crane's main boom before the jib had been properly secured. The plaintiffs contended that the crane operator had the ultimate responsibility to ensure the safety of the site, and noted that in 2010, after a “rash of jib incidents,” the company established new policies saying crane operators needed to be fully aware of the safe work practices and always aware of employees they were supervising.
However, according to the plaintiffs' memo, the policy failed to require that crane operators visually confirm that the jib is secure before taking out the pins.
Mediation memos from defendants Maxim Crane; P.J. Dick, the construction manager, and American Ornamental Iron Corp., a subcontractor, contended that they were not responsible for securing the safety of the site, and that Chapman had contributed to the accident.
Maxim Crane's memo noted that Chapman had been a certified crane operator, and contended that Chapman had played a larger role in the effort to take apart the jib.
Another worker on the site, Brian Eddy, was also injured during the crash. He sustained a wrist fracture, which required surgery.
Although Eddy's case was filed in Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas, the discovery and mediation were done together with Chapman's case. Eddy's case settled for a confidential amount.
Eddy's attorney, Frank Moore of Mansmann and Moore, said the incident was a tragedy, but his client was pleased with the settlement.
William Cilingin of Naulty, Scaricamazza & McDevitt, who represented American Ornamental Iron, declined to comment. Neither Rawle & Henderson attorney Catherine Walto, who represented Maxim Crane, nor Michelle Coburn of White and Williams, who represented P.J. Dick, returned a call seeking comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSuperior Court Directs Western Pa. Judge to Recuse From Case Over Business Ties to Defendant
3 minute readKline & Specter and Bosworth Resolve Post-Settlement Fighting Ahead of Courtroom Showdown
6 minute readSaxton & Stump Lands Newly Retired Ex-Chief Judge From Middle District of Pa.
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Silk Road Founder Ross Ulbricht Has New York Sentence Pardoned by Trump
- 2Settlement Allows Spouses of U.S. Citizens to Reopen Removal Proceedings
- 3CFPB Resolves Flurry of Enforcement Actions in Biden's Final Week
- 4Judge Orders SoCal Edison to Preserve Evidence Relating to Los Angeles Wildfires
- 5Legal Community Luminaries Honored at New York State Bar Association’s Annual Meeting
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250