Aspiring Brothel Owner and Murder-Plotting Attorney Fights $3,500 Tab for Rides Between Prison and Court
Disbarred Bucks County lawyer Joseph P. Guarrasi could have expected stern treatment from the justice system after being convicted of plotting to murder a man so he could turn his house into a sex club. But having to pay for his rides to and from prison?
September 17, 2018 at 02:56 PM
4 minute read
Disbarred Bucks County lawyer Joseph P. Guarrasi could have expected stern treatment from the justice system after being convicted of plotting to murder a man so he could turn his house into a sex club. But having to pay for his rides to and from prison?
On Sept. 14, a three-judge panel of the Commonwealth Court allowed Guarrasi to clear a procedural hurdle in his case against Bucks County, its sheriff's department and its clerk of courts, which he sued after being stuck with a $3,500 transportation bill incurred from 12 trips to and from his cell to the Bucks County courthouse furnished by the sheriff's department from 2007 to 2015. During that period, Guarrasi was litigating, in forma pauperis, his Post-Conviction Relief Act claims.
The court overruled the defendants' preliminary objections to Guarrasi's claims that making him pay for the rides is unconstitutional.
Guarrasi argued that Section 9728(g) of the Sentencing Code, which authorizes government agencies to recoup some administrative costs, including for transportation, was not enacted until after he was sentenced. Therefore, Guarrasi contended, any attempt to collect transportation costs from him under Section 9728(g) was an improper attempt to apply the law retroactively, in violation of the ex post facto clause in the Pennsylvania Constitution, according to Judge Patricia McCullough, who penned the opinion.
McCullough, joined by Judge P. Kevin Brobson and Senior Judge James Gardner Colins, said Guarrasi set forth a plausible constitutional claim. The panel also rejected the defendants' attempt to invoke governmental immunity, finding that immunity does not shield government entities from actions seeking injunctive relief.
Paul Lang, who represents the sheriff's office, did not return a call seeking comment.
Guarrasi, who represents himself in the case, is incarcerated at State Correctional Institution Benner Township in Bellefonte. He pleaded guilty to several crimes in 2005 and was sentenced to six-and-a-half to 15 years in prison.
Guarrasi purchased a home in Doylestown with the intention of transforming it into a “'Kama Sutra' sex club,” court documents said. When he encountered problems with the real estate transaction and failed in his attempts to evict the resident of the house, Guarrasi solicited a man named Michael Samios to kidnap, assault and “'make disappear'” the resident.
Samios, alarmed by the instructions, contacted authorities, according to court documents. He was wired by investigators from the Bucks County District Attorney's Office and recorded several conversations with Guarrasi.
Additionally, Guarrasi was charged for running a scheme to defraud insurers by staging auto accidents. As part of the scam, he attempted to elicit others to file fraudulent insurance claims.
After his conviction, Guarrasi argued his counsel was ineffective, claiming that despite having a severe mental illness and being unmedicated for days, he was allowed by his defense counsel to enter an involuntary and unknowing guilty plea. Guarrasi also claimed he had wanted to go to trial and was unaware of available defenses because his attorney failed to argue that the wire recordings should have been suppressed. On top of that, Guarrasi accused his attorney of “failing to undertake a reasonable investigation, unaware of law fundamental to the case, abandoning requested discovery and stipulating to false facts.”
Bucks County Court of Common Pleas Senior Judge Albert J. Cepparulo denied Guarrasi's petition in a 112-page opinion issued Oct. 20, 2015.
The judge said Guarrasi's ineffective assistance of counsel claims were meritless, noting that Guarrasi failed to present any evidence that he “was anything less than of clear mind” during his guilty plea. Cepparulo also said there was no basis to allege that the recordings of Guarrasi's conversations with Samios were made in violation of the state Wiretapping and Electronic Surveillance Control Act.
The Superior Court unanimously upheld Cepparulo's ruling in November 2016.
According to state records, Guarrasi was disbarred on consent in September 2005.
Read More
Pittsburgh Firm's Office Manager, Partner's Son, Sentenced for Embezzlement
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPhila. Jury Awards $15M to Woman Who Slipped on Apartment Building Stairs
4 minute readPlaintiffs Seek Redo of First Trial Over Medical Device Plant's Emissions
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1The Key Moves in the Reshuffling German Legal Market as 2025 Dawns
- 2Social Media Celebrities Clash in $100M Lawsuit
- 3Federal Judge Sets 2026 Admiralty Bench Trial in Baltimore Bridge Collapse Litigation
- 4Trump Media Accuses Purchaser Rep of Extortion, Harassment After Merger
- 5Judge Slashes $2M in Punitive Damages in Sober-Living Harassment Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250