Rep.: Immunity for Banks That Delay Transactions for Suspected Financial Exploitation
State Rep. Bryan Barbin, D-Cambria, is set to introduce the Senior Safety Act, legislation that would provide administrative and civil liability to banks and individuals that work for banks that delay financial transactions when seniors are suspected victims of financial exploitation.
September 21, 2018 at 02:00 PM
2 minute read
Rep. Bryan Barbin, D-Cambria, is set to introduce the Senior Safety Act, legislation that would provide administrative and civil liability to banks and individuals that work for banks that delay financial transactions when seniors are suspected victims of financial exploitation.
Seniors are defined as anyone 60 years old or older in the proposed amendment to Title 23 of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes.
If a bank or bank employee “reasonably believes” that financial exploitation has occurred, is occurring or may have been attempted they can notify the Pennsylvania Department of Aging or the Pennsylvania Banking and Securities Commission. If that bank entity or bank employee makes a disclosure of the possible exploitation in “good faith” and with “reasonable care,” they would have immunity from administrative or civil liability that may arise from the disclosure.
The entity or employee may also notify a third party previously designated by the senior citizen if a financial exploitation is suspected. Disclosure to a third party in that matter would also be provided immunity.
The proposed amendment also allows banks to delay disbursement of funds from an account if the bank reasonably believes, after initiating an internal review of the transaction, that the disbursement may result in financial exploitation of a senior citizen. In no more than two business days the bank must provide written notice and the reasoning for the delay in disbursing funds to the parties authorized to use the account, unless a party is suspected of or had attempted financial exploitation of the senior citizen account holder. The bank must also notify the state Department of Aging and the Banking and Securities Commission of the delay in providing transactions, in two business days as well.
The delay expires 15 business days after the original date of the delay or after the bank has determined the transaction would not result in financial exploitation, whichever is earlier. However, the state commission can extend the delay but no later than 25 business days after the original delay.
— Victoria Hudgins, of the Law Weekly •
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCapitol Report: Additional Common Pleas Judges, Professional Licesnsing
Capitol Report: Prescription Coverage, Striking Workers, Stormwater Management
Trending Stories
- 1The Quiet Revolution: Private Equity’s Push Into Law Firms
- 2Restoring Trust in the Courts Starts in New York
- 3'Pull Back the Curtain': Ex-NFL Players Seek Discovery in Lawsuit Over League's Disability Plan
- 4Tensions Run High at Final Hearing Before Manhattan Congestion Pricing Takes Effect
- 5Improper Removal to Fed. Court Leads to $100K Bill for Blue Cross Blue Shield
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250