Atlanta, Austin Lead on Legal Industry Job Growth, but Pittsburgh Making Gains, Report Says
Real estate giant CBRE also thinks the time is ripe for firms to revive moves to consolidate administrative functions at what it calls "centers of excellence."
September 27, 2018 at 06:00 AM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The American Lawyer
With growing employment opportunities for both lawyers and legal support professionals, Atlanta and Austin, Texas, stand out from the crowd, but Pittsburgh has emerged as an up-and-coming market in its own right.
Atlanta and Austin saw double-digit growth for lawyer employment since 2015 while adding more legal service jobs over that same period than any other American city, according to a newly released study from real estate services firm CBRE.
Pittsburgh, meanwhile, ranked No. 7 among the highest growth markets for lawyer jobs and No. 10 among the highest growth markets for legal services positions.
Lawyer employment in Pittsburgh grew 6.7 percent since 2015, as compared to the national average of 3 percent. Legal services employment grew in Pittsburgh by 2.1 percent during that same period, as compared to the national average of 1.5 percent.
The numbers reflect a renewed interest in the Pittsburgh legal market in recent years, particularly from out-of-town firms like Porter Wright Morris & Arthur, Spilman Thomas & Battle and Cozen O'Connor.
“Pittsburgh is sort of uniquely positioned because of the lower overhead associated with practicing in Pittsburgh, as well as the growing and dynamic tech community,” Maura McAnney of Pittsburgh-based legal recruiting firm McAnney, Esposito & Kraybill Associates, told The Legal last year. “I do think more firms will begin to open up, mostly because there are so many Pittsburgh lawyers who have global practices.”
But while Pittsburgh's growth remains promising, Atlanta and Austin are officially booming.
Atlanta was home to 16.3 percent more lawyers in 2017 than two years earlier, labor market data compiled by CBRE showed. That growth was over four percentage points more than the runner-up, Los Angeles, where lawyer head count grew at 11.9 percent. Other cities with double-digit growth included Kansas City, Austin and San Francisco.
Looking at the wider category of legal services, Austin added jobs at an 11.1 percent clip, while Atlanta was second at 8.3 percent. Phoenix, Detroit and Dallas/Fort Worth rounded out the top five, all growing between 4 percent and 5 percent. The national average was 1.5 percent.
“Austin is a really interesting story, from a lot of perspectives. If you look at why law firms are growing where they are, it's clear that they're following business services in general,” said Julie Whelan, head of occupier research for the Americas at CBRE.
Whelan said the city was emblematic of the tech boom that's been fueling growth across markets in the South and the West, but notably less so in the Northeast.
“Austin is such a hot spot for legal services growth because it's also a hot spot for 'office-using employment' growth,” she said, using the industry term for jobs in the professional and business spheres, including startups.
In an era when even growing law firms are shrinking their space, Austin was also one of only three markets with positive net absorption—more square feet becoming occupied than vacated—by law firms over the last 12 months.
Austin's burgeoning millennial population is also part of the story, particularly in a legal marketplace where competition for the top layer of young talent is escalating. The city has the highest concentration of millennials in the nation, at 28.2 percent of the population, a figure that has grown 12.2 percent since 2012.
Thus far in 2018, Reed Smith and Shearman & Sterling have placed bets on the city.
“We see that Austin will continue to be a hot millennial market, even growing faster in the future,” Whelan said.
The CBRE report also flags Austin as a top locale for establishing a law firm “center of excellence”: the company's term for shared-service hubs consolidating information technology, finance, human resources and marketing professionals, alongside staff attorneys.
After sparking a flurry of headlines a few years back, announcements of law firms opening such hubs have been scarcer in recent years. Whelan said the extended economic expansion has encouraged firms to maximize revenues rather than taking big bets to lower costs by becoming leaner. Instead, she suggested, they've been simply looking to contract space while growing business in low-cost areas.
That could change closer to 2020, the year in which a growing number of economists are predicting an economic slowdown, or even a recession.
“Law firms will have to look for operational efficiencies,” she said. “We figured it was time to plant the seed for this discussion.”
According to CBRE, Atlanta also makes sense as a site for these shared-service hubs, even though as an “established market,” it falls into a different classification than growing Austin. As a top-10 market in terms of total numbers of lawyers and legal service professionals, there's a skilled local population, while costs are lower than New York, Washington, D.C., Los Angeles and San Francisco.
Am Law 100 firm Squire Patton Boggs, Am Law 200 firm Adams and Reese and Denver-based litigation boutique Wheeler Trigg are among the firms that have set up traditional offices in Atlanta since 2017.
The study estimates the yearly cost of hiring a mix of 100 legal professionals at $6.77 million in Atlanta and $6.70 million in Austin, both below the national average of $6.82 million and the New York City rate of $7.95 million.
Read More:
Why Don't More Firms Have Back Offices?
Will Law Firms Be Ready When the Next Recession Hits?
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPa. High Court to Weigh Parent Company's Liability for Dissolved Subsidiary's Conduct
3 minute readAppeals Court Rules Pittsburgh School District Immune to Suit Over Sex Abuse of Disabled Student
4 minute readVolunteering for Voter Protection Efforts, Pa. Firms Brace for Contentious Election
5 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250