Atlanta, Austin Lead on Legal Industry Job Growth, but Pittsburgh Making Gains, Report Says
Real estate giant CBRE also thinks the time is ripe for firms to revive moves to consolidate administrative functions at what it calls "centers of excellence."
September 27, 2018 at 06:00 AM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The American Lawyer
With growing employment opportunities for both lawyers and legal support professionals, Atlanta and Austin, Texas, stand out from the crowd, but Pittsburgh has emerged as an up-and-coming market in its own right.
Atlanta and Austin saw double-digit growth for lawyer employment since 2015 while adding more legal service jobs over that same period than any other American city, according to a newly released study from real estate services firm CBRE.
Pittsburgh, meanwhile, ranked No. 7 among the highest growth markets for lawyer jobs and No. 10 among the highest growth markets for legal services positions.
Lawyer employment in Pittsburgh grew 6.7 percent since 2015, as compared to the national average of 3 percent. Legal services employment grew in Pittsburgh by 2.1 percent during that same period, as compared to the national average of 1.5 percent.
The numbers reflect a renewed interest in the Pittsburgh legal market in recent years, particularly from out-of-town firms like Porter Wright Morris & Arthur, Spilman Thomas & Battle and Cozen O'Connor.
“Pittsburgh is sort of uniquely positioned because of the lower overhead associated with practicing in Pittsburgh, as well as the growing and dynamic tech community,” Maura McAnney of Pittsburgh-based legal recruiting firm McAnney, Esposito & Kraybill Associates, told The Legal last year. “I do think more firms will begin to open up, mostly because there are so many Pittsburgh lawyers who have global practices.”
But while Pittsburgh's growth remains promising, Atlanta and Austin are officially booming.
Atlanta was home to 16.3 percent more lawyers in 2017 than two years earlier, labor market data compiled by CBRE showed. That growth was over four percentage points more than the runner-up, Los Angeles, where lawyer head count grew at 11.9 percent. Other cities with double-digit growth included Kansas City, Austin and San Francisco.
Looking at the wider category of legal services, Austin added jobs at an 11.1 percent clip, while Atlanta was second at 8.3 percent. Phoenix, Detroit and Dallas/Fort Worth rounded out the top five, all growing between 4 percent and 5 percent. The national average was 1.5 percent.
“Austin is a really interesting story, from a lot of perspectives. If you look at why law firms are growing where they are, it's clear that they're following business services in general,” said Julie Whelan, head of occupier research for the Americas at CBRE.
Whelan said the city was emblematic of the tech boom that's been fueling growth across markets in the South and the West, but notably less so in the Northeast.
“Austin is such a hot spot for legal services growth because it's also a hot spot for 'office-using employment' growth,” she said, using the industry term for jobs in the professional and business spheres, including startups.
In an era when even growing law firms are shrinking their space, Austin was also one of only three markets with positive net absorption—more square feet becoming occupied than vacated—by law firms over the last 12 months.
Austin's burgeoning millennial population is also part of the story, particularly in a legal marketplace where competition for the top layer of young talent is escalating. The city has the highest concentration of millennials in the nation, at 28.2 percent of the population, a figure that has grown 12.2 percent since 2012.
Thus far in 2018, Reed Smith and Shearman & Sterling have placed bets on the city.
“We see that Austin will continue to be a hot millennial market, even growing faster in the future,” Whelan said.
The CBRE report also flags Austin as a top locale for establishing a law firm “center of excellence”: the company's term for shared-service hubs consolidating information technology, finance, human resources and marketing professionals, alongside staff attorneys.
After sparking a flurry of headlines a few years back, announcements of law firms opening such hubs have been scarcer in recent years. Whelan said the extended economic expansion has encouraged firms to maximize revenues rather than taking big bets to lower costs by becoming leaner. Instead, she suggested, they've been simply looking to contract space while growing business in low-cost areas.
That could change closer to 2020, the year in which a growing number of economists are predicting an economic slowdown, or even a recession.
“Law firms will have to look for operational efficiencies,” she said. “We figured it was time to plant the seed for this discussion.”
According to CBRE, Atlanta also makes sense as a site for these shared-service hubs, even though as an “established market,” it falls into a different classification than growing Austin. As a top-10 market in terms of total numbers of lawyers and legal service professionals, there's a skilled local population, while costs are lower than New York, Washington, D.C., Los Angeles and San Francisco.
Am Law 100 firm Squire Patton Boggs, Am Law 200 firm Adams and Reese and Denver-based litigation boutique Wheeler Trigg are among the firms that have set up traditional offices in Atlanta since 2017.
The study estimates the yearly cost of hiring a mix of 100 legal professionals at $6.77 million in Atlanta and $6.70 million in Austin, both below the national average of $6.82 million and the New York City rate of $7.95 million.
Read More:
Why Don't More Firms Have Back Offices?
Will Law Firms Be Ready When the Next Recession Hits?
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSuperior Court Rejects Pa. Hospital's Challenge to $7.3M Med Mal Judgment
3 minute readPittsburgh Judge Rules Loan Company's Online Arbitration Agreement Unenforceable
3 minute readPa. High Court to Weigh Parent Company's Liability for Dissolved Subsidiary's Conduct
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250