Bullish on Blockchain, Young Phila. Lawyer Launches Boutique
Andrew Bull has established a blockchain law boutique in Philadelphia.
October 01, 2018 at 05:22 PM
4 minute read
At 30, Andrew Bull is young for a law firm founder. But the blockchain technology his firm specializes in is much younger.
Bull's new Philadelphia law firm, Bull Blockchain Law, officially opened its doors a little over a month ago. It's not the first time he has launched a business rooted in the burgeoning area of blockchain technology. He founded a cryptocurrency mining company just a few years ago, which he recently closed, and worked on a digital asset fund, which Bull said is comparable to a hedge fund, but with cryptocurrency.
As his new firm's website says: “We've mined. We've traded. We get it.”
It all started with a fascination in bitcoin, which Bull started learning about in 2011 before he started law school at Drexel University. At the time, the virtual currency was little known. “I had no idea it would become as popular as it is today,” Bull said.
Bull was one of a few early members in Philadelphia's bitcoin community, he said, and continues to speak about bitcoin and blockchain while providing technology consulting and legal counsel, particularly on regulatory issues.
Until recently, he did that alongside work on other matters at Haines & Associates in Philadelphia. But when it began to take over his practice, he decided to go out on his own. Clifford Haines did not respond to a call for comment on Bull's departure.
“The industry is expanding exponentially, and I'm fortunate to have been in it for a while,” Bull said. “We were finally getting regulatory clarity from the agencies. There was a somewhat clear path on how to advise clients.”
His client base includes various technology industry players with some connection to blockchain technology, he said. They're using the technology for matters in real estate, data storage, supply chain management, and even gaming. Smart contracts are the most popular business application of blockchain technology, he said.
Bull said he's already in talks with other attorneys about joining the firm, with the goal of ultimately organizing the firm into various departments for different industries.
According to Bull, his firm is the first blockchain and cryptocurrency boutique in Philadelphia. But he's certainly not the first to capitalize on the legal side of blockchain technology.
In Big Law, Pittsburgh-founded K&L Gates announced last year its plan to launch a private blockchain, through a partnership with technology company Chainvine. And several large firms recently spoke with The American Lawyer about corporate clients currently working on blockchain-related projects in the asset-backed securitization space.
In the smart contracts space, Pittsburgh startup LegalSifter has partnered with multiple law firms in developing smart contract software that links artificial intelligence with human intelligence.
A lack of understanding is the biggest hurdle to building up business in his area of expertise, Bull said, so he aims to explain the opportunities as straightforwardly as possible. He said the blockchain community has been built on a foundation of “decentralized, open-source information.” But that philosophy can live in harmony with a business built on paid legal and consulting services, he said.
“The more people that are involved and understand it, the more the technology can advance,” he said.
READ MORE:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'The World Didn't End This Morning': Phila. Firm Leaders Respond to Election Results
4 minute readSettlement With Kleinbard in Diversity Contracting Tiff Allows Pa. Lawyer to Avoid Sanctions
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Litigator of the Week Runners-Up and Shout-Outs: Week of Nov. 24
- 2Justices Appear Leery to Letting Holocaust-Related Claims Against Hungary in U.S. Courts
- 3Judge Rejects New Trial for Tom Girardi, Whose Testimony Was 'Consistent With the Defense Case'
- 4New University of Chicago Law Course Digs Deeper Into Using Gen AI Responsibly
- 5The Defense Bar Is Feeling the Strain: Busy Med Mal Trial Schedules Might Be Phila.'s 'New Normal'
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250