High Court to Mull Suspended Sentences for Civil Contempt
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court is set to review a Superior Court ruling that it is illegal for judges to impose suspended sentences for civil contempt.
October 11, 2018 at 01:58 PM
4 minute read
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court is set to review a Superior Court ruling that it is illegal for judges to impose suspended sentences for civil contempt.
In a unanimous published opinion issued May 8 in Thompson v. Thompson, a three-judge panel of the Superior Court reversed a Clarion County trial judge's order that a mother would have to serve a six-month jail sentence if she fell behind on monthly payments toward child support arrears.
“The law is clear that an indefinitely suspended sentence is not a sentencing alternative and is illegal,” Judge Jacqueline Shogan wrote for the court, citing the Superior Court's 2004 ruling in Commonwealth v. Joseph. “Although Joseph dealt with sentencing in a criminal matter, we conclude that its rationale is instructive in our review of a sentence imposed for civil contempt.”
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAre Lead Attorney Relationships More Important Now Than Law Firm Brands?
7 minute readConduct Board Urges 'Swift and Severe Punishment' for Phila. Judge's Facebook Posts
3 minute readTractor Supply Co. Accused of Implementing Unlawful 'Tobacco Surcharges' in ERISA Class Action
3 minute readPa. Supreme Court Takes 'Naked Ballots' Case Over Pennsylvania Mail-In Voting
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1'I'm Staying Everything': Texas Bankruptcy Judge Halts Talc Trials Against J&J
- 2What We Know About the Kentucky Judge Killed in His Chambers
- 3Ex-Prosecutor and Judge Fatally Shot During Attempted Arrest on Federal Corruption Charges
- 4Judge Blasts Authors' Lawyers in Key AI Suit, Says Case Doomed Without Upgraded Team
- 5Federal Judge Won't Stop Title IX Investigation Into Former GMU Law Professor
Who Got The Work
LPL Financial, a major broker-dealer, and the Bank of Springfield have turned to attorneys John A. Kauerauf and Brian D. Lee of Sorling Northrup to defend a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Aug. 13 in Illinois Southern District Court by Schottel & Associates on behalf of a former financial adviser who was allegedly subjected to sexual orientation discrimination and sexual harassment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Staci M. Yandle, is 3:24-cv-01881, Bellew Jr. v. Bank of Springfield et al.
Who Got The Work
Burr & Forman partner Garry K. Grooms has entered an appearance for 4M Acquisitions and Wallace D. Tweden in a pending environmental lawsuit. The action, filed July 22 in Tennessee Middle District Court by the McKellar Law Group and Mark E. Martin LLC on behalf of Tennessee Riverkeeper, contends that the defendant's violated the Clean Water Act and Tennessee Water Quality Control Act by allowing for the discharge of pollutants into waters of the U.S. without obtaining a National Pollutant Discharge permit. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Aleta A. Trauger, is 3:24-cv-00886, Tennessee Riverkeeper, Inc. v. Tweden et al.
Who Got The Work
Ramsey M. Al-Salam, Gene W. Lee and Stevan R. Stark of Perkins Coie have entered appearances for R-Pac International in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The case, filed Aug. 12 in New York Southern District Court by PinilisHalpern LLP and Friedman Suder & Cooke on behalf of Adasa Inc, asserts a single patent related to wireless sensors used for tagging products. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein, is 1:24-cv-06102, Adasa Inc. v. R-Pac International LLC.
Who Got The Work
Walmart has tapped lawyer Nicole M. Wright of Zausmer PC to defend a pending product liability lawsuit. The action was filed Aug. 12 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Wolfe Trial Lawyers on behalf of a plaintiff claiming burns from a defective propane tank. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Matthew F. Leitman, is 2:24-cv-12100, Hill v. Ferrellgas, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Kevin Simpson and James Randall of Winston & Strawn have stepped in to represent Comcast in a pending consumer class action. The case, filed Aug. 11 in Georgia Northern District Court by Kaufman PA, contends that the defendant placed pre-recorded debt collection phone calls to the plaintiff in violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge J.P. Boulee, is 1:24-cv-03553, Pond v. Comcast Cable Communications LLC.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250