Parties Disputed Whether Tree Well Was a Dangerous Condition
On Dec. 15, 2012, plaintiff Joann Marino, an accountant in her 60s, tripped and fell when she stepped into a tree well on a mall sidewalk, in New Hope. She suffered fractures to both wrists.
October 11, 2018 at 02:53 PM
4 minute read
Marino v. Torchlight Loan Services
$40,000 Verdict
Date of Verdict: June 25.
Court and Case No.: C.P. Bucks No. 2013-07699.
Judge: Robert J. Mellon.
Type of Action: Premises liability, slip-and-fall.
Injuries: Wrist fractures.
Plaintiffs Counsel: Jason R. Weiss, Haggerty, Goldberg, Schleifer & Kupersmith, Philadelphia.
Plaintiffs Expert: Ronald J. Cohen, engineering, Malvern.
Defense Counsel: David T. Bush, Forry Ullman, King of Prussia.
Comment:
On Dec. 15, 2012, plaintiff Joann Marino, an accountant in her 60s, tripped and fell when she stepped into a tree well on a mall sidewalk, in New Hope. She suffered fractures to both wrists.
Marino sued property owner CBRE Inc., alleging that it was negligent for allowing a dangerous condition to exist on its premises.
Torchlight Loan Services and Torchlight Investors had been improperly named in the lawsuit's caption and were dismissed prior to trial.
Marino alleged that she had been walking with a friend and had her head turned to her right when she stepped into the tree well, causing her to trip and fall. The tree well had a depression of about 1.5 inches and contained rocks and mulch.
Marino's expert in engineering testified that there should have been a metal grate covering the tree well to make it flush with the sidewalk. The lack of a grate made the tree well a dangerous condition for pedestrians, since it was not in their line of vision and they would not have immediately recognized it, especially if they were window shopping or looking for their parked vehicles. The expert determined that the defective condition violated standards set by the American Society for Testing and Materials.
The defense counsel contended that the tree well was an open and obvious condition and noted that there had been no prior accidents related to it. Counsel faulted Marino for the accident, pointing out that she had her head turned and was talking to a friend rather than paying attention to where she was walking.
After she tripped, Marino outstretched her hands to brace her fall. She was taken by ambulance to a hospital, where she was admitted and diagnosed with bilateral distal radius fractures.
Marino had open reduction and internal fixation surgery, with plates and screws implanted. After she was discharged, Marino began a course of physical therapy, which included exercise, and consulted with her surgeon. She treated with about four months of physical therapy.
By the summer of 2013, Marino was discharged by her surgeon. She sought to recover a medical lien of approximately $18,000 and about $9,000 in lost wages, having missed two months of work.
Marino's counsel cited her medical records to attribute her injuries and treatment to the accident.
Marino testified that, in the initial months after she returned to work, she required ergonomic devices to assist with her job duties. She said that she continues to experience wrist pain and discomfort which affect her ability to interact with her grandchildren and to practice yoga. She sought damages for past and future pain and suffering. Her husband had withdrawn his claim for loss of consortium, prior to trial.
The defense did not dispute Marino's injuries and treatment, and the court entered a directed verdict in favor of Marino on the issue of causation.
The jury found Marino was 46 percent liable for her accident and CBRE Inc. was 54 percent liable. Marino was determined to receive $40,000, which was reduced to $21,600 to reflect the apportionment of liability.
This report is based on information that was provided by plaintiffs' and CBREs' counsel. The remaining defendants' counsel was not asked to contribute.
—This report first appeared in VerdictSearch, an ALM publication.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllThe Rise of AI and Other Changes Abound in the Law: A 2024 Year-End Review
18 minute readMatt's Corner: Contributory Negligence Can Be a Bar to Legal Malpractice Recovery
2 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250