Drexel Hill Lawyer Suspended for Misusing Client Money
Dory L. Sater was suspended Friday after failing to comply with records requests in his disciplinary investigation.
October 12, 2018 at 04:47 PM
3 minute read
A solo attorney who has already faced litigation over referral fees has now been suspended by the Pennsylvania Disciplinary Board for allegedly misappropriating client funds.
Dory L. Sater of The Sater Law Firm, located in the Drexel Hill section of Delaware County, was placed under emergency temporary suspension Friday by order of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court. According to Friday's order, “it has been found that his continued practice of law is causing immediate and substantial public or private harm.”
Sater, in a phone interview Monday, said he did not misappropriate any client money, and intends to clear his name.
“The worst thing I'm guilty of is poor record-keeping or bookkeeping,” Sater said.
According to an opinion by the Pennsylvania Office of Disciplinary Counsel, an investigation of Sater, when it began, centered on $275,000 he deposited into an IOLTA account in connection with an arbitration award, and a complaint by attorney John Lord regarding how Sater handled a contested fee in a separate case.
Beginning in November 2016, the ODC said, Sater stopped responding to the ODC's requests for information regarding those and other allegations against him, including allegations that he had converted client funds.
And in February 2017, the opinion said, the Pennsylvania Lawyers Fund for Client Security noticed that the balance in Sater's IOLTA account was negative.
In August, the ODC emailed Sater to notify him that he faced temporary suspension if he did not submit required records by Aug. 30, the opinion said. Sater acknowledged that notification on Aug. 20, the opinion said, but did not submit any records or have any other communication with the ODC after that.
Sater was sued last year by the law firm where he worked as an associate from 2009 to 2014, Haggerty, Goldberg, Schleifer & Kupersmith. The firm alleged that he had failed to pay referral fees in connection to cases he took with him when he left to start his own firm.
Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas Judge Ramy Djerassi entered default judgment in the Haggerty Goldberg case late last year because Sater failed to file an answer. According to court records, Djerassi ordered Sater to pay Haggerty Goldberg $48,500.
Fees for Haggerty Goldberg were referenced a number of times within the ODC's complaint, as Sater's explanation for money held or paid.
Sater was also sued by local firm Silvers, Langsam & Weitzman in 2015, for failing to pay the firm agreed-upon fees and costs after a personal injury client, Regina Donnelly, took her case from Silvers Langsam to Sater's firm. According to the ODC's petition, Sater allegedly failed to keep $20,000 of contested money from Donnelly's settlement separate until his dispute with Silvers Langsam resolved.
At one point, the judge in that case entered default judgment against Sater and Donnelly, who was also a defendant, for failing to file answers. Sater was able to have the judgment reopened and the case was scheduled for trial.
Sater and Silvers Langsam did ultimately reach a settlement just before trial, according to the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas. But Silvers Langsam attorney Lord advised the Disciplinary Board of the situation, the ODC's opinion said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'The World Didn't End This Morning': Phila. Firm Leaders Respond to Election Results
4 minute readSettlement With Kleinbard in Diversity Contracting Tiff Allows Pa. Lawyer to Avoid Sanctions
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Whether to Choose State or Federal Court in a Case Involving a Franchise?
- 2Am Law 200 Firms Announce Wave of D.C. Hires in White-Collar, Antitrust, Litigation Practices
- 3K&L Gates Files String of Suits Against Electronics Manufacturer's Competitors, Brightness Misrepresentations
- 4'Better of the Split': District Judge Weighs Circuit Divide in Considering Who Pays Decades-Old Medical Bill
- 5Which Georgia Courts Are Closed Today?—Here's a List
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.