The Emergence of Citizenship by Investment and E-2 Visa Option
The E-2 visa classification is authorized for a foreign national who is coming to the U.S. to direct and develop the operations of an enterprise in which the individual has invested or is actively involved in the process of investing a substantial amount of capital.
October 16, 2018 at 01:40 PM
6 minute read
The E-2 visa classification is authorized for a foreign national who is coming to the U.S. to direct and develop the operations of an enterprise in which the individual has invested or is actively involved in the process of investing a substantial amount of capital. The E-2 visa has some major benefits, such as:
- Fast processing time and a validity period of up to five years for certain countries;
- The ability for the foreign national and the family members to reside in the United States;
- The foreign national can work for the E-2 business;
- The spouse can work anywhere without restriction;
- The child can go to public or private school in the United States;
- Possibility to avoid taxation on worldwide income; and
- The ability to get indefinite extension after each validity period.
However, the E-2 visa is only available for foreign nationals who possess the nationality of a country with which the United States maintains a bilateral investment treaty or a treaty of friendship, commerce and navigation. Per the list of treaty countries published by the U.S. Department of State, the E-2 visa is available to nationals of roughly 80 countries in the world.
In recent years, delays in various immigration preference categories have brought this visa under the spotlight. In 2015, a visa cut-off date for China EB-5 was established. The current visa wait time for an EB-5 applicant born in China is likely to be beyond 10 years for someone who makes the application today. Earlier this year, a waiting list for Vietnam EB-5 was established. Meanwhile, India EB-2/EB-3 has a wait time estimated to be in excess of 15 years, and India EB-5 is expected to also retrogress in 2019. Even the EB-1 extraordinary ability category is backlogged worldwide at the time of writing. While the E-2 visa is not directly available to nationals of the countries mentioned above, through the “citizenship by investment” (CBI) programs of certain treaty countries, those investors can apply for the E-2 visa by obtaining citizenship of a treaty country before making the qualifying investment in the United States. This visa option can be utilized in lieu of a green card, or to supplement the green card application process so that the foreign national can stay in the United States before they get their green card.
There are only a few E-2 treaty countries in the world that have CBI programs under which a third country national can obtain the citizenship in a short amount of time. Grenada has traditionally been the top choice for this option. Recently, Turkey, Moldova and Montenegro also launched their own CBI program. One noteworthy issue is that the validity period of the E-2 visa differs among those countries. While citizens of Grenada and Turkey can get an E-2 visa that is valid for five years, the validity period is much shorter for citizens of Montenegro (12 months) and Moldova (three months).
The Citizenship by Investment (CBI) and E-2 Visa option has its obvious advantages for certain foreign nationals from nontreaty countries.
One of the major benefits of E-2 is that it can be obtained quickly. In the case of Grenada E-2, the E-2 investor will first obtain Grenadian citizenship which can usually be done in about four months. The E-2 application can then be submitted to the U.S. consulate in the country of residence. The entire process generally takes about six to seven months. Getting an EB-1 green card, on the other hand, can easily take well over a year. The quick turnaround for E-2 makes it a good option for people who are looking for a program that allows them to come to the United States in the shortest amount of time possible.
For those with a pending EB-5 application who are perturbed by the unprecedented wait time, they can use the E-2 visa to bring their entire family to the United States in six to seven months and start living the American Dream before the final arrival of the EB-5 green card. Note that getting a third country passport would not shorten their EB-5 wait time, which is determined by the investor's country of birth.
For those who possess the necessary language and management skills and have the aspiration to start their own business in the United States, managing a business of a size that is suitable for an EB-1C multinational executive or manager application could be a daunting task for a new immigrant. E-2 provides an entry point for them to start their business in the United States before they are ready to commit further.
On the other hand, even if the foreign national has limited English language ability, it is still possible to convince the consulate that the applicant can still effectively “develop and direct” the business. Some of the E-2 businesses on the market come with a professional management team that will take over the daily management and provide language assistance. Therefore, E-2 visa is still within reach if a foreign national does not speak English very well.
Last but not least, unlike EB-5, E-2 visa does not have a minimum investment amount. Rather, the investment is considered “substantial” if the invested amount is sufficient to create or develop the type of enterprise in which the investor is investing. Many of the E-2 businesses on the market will only need an investment in the $200,000 range, which is significantly lower than investing in an EB-5 project or purchasing a U.S. business to apply for EB-1C. The flip side is that the E-2 investor will still need to invest additional money to obtain a third country citizenship. For Grenada, the good news is that recent legislative changes have made it possible to sell the property in the secondary market to another applicant who wishes to apply for Grenadian citizenship.
The legislative history of the E visa can be traced back to the infamous Chinese Exclusion Act and the 1880 Treaty between the United States and China. It is quite interesting to observe that 130 years later, the legislative successor of the Chinese merchants' status under the 1880 Treaty proffers a viable immigration vehicle for nationals of China and other countries with serious visa backlog issues.
F. Oliver Yang, an attorney at Klasko Immigration Law Partners, manages the process to obtain long-term residence through E-2 visa/Grenada citizenship. He also manages all stages of the EB-5 process. As a native Mandarin Chinese speaker, he guides Chinese investors with I-526 petitions, as well as investors from Taiwan, Canada, Singapore, India, Indonesia and South Africa.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWhile Data Breaches May Lead to Years of Legal Battles, Cyberattacks Can Be Prevented
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Debtor-Owner Allowed to Modify Mortgage in Bankruptcy Even if Debtor Is Not Obligor Under the Mortgage Loan
- 2Legal Chief of Retailer Beyond Exiting at Tumultuous Time
- 3Law Firm Real Estate Strategy: Attorney Offices Are Out, Conference Rooms Are In
- 4AI Governance In Practice
- 5Section 1782 Practice Pointers From Recent Decisions
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250