Duane Morris Links With Cannabis Trade Group as Legal Pot Spreads
The firm and the American Trade Association for Cannabis & Hemp said it's the first time a national cannabis trade organization has partnered with an Am Law 100 law firm.
October 17, 2018 at 06:04 PM
4 minute read
Duane Morris has been representing cannabis clients for a few years, and now the firm is casting its lot even more closely with the fledgling industry.
The Philadelphia-based Am Law 100 firm is partnering with the American Trade Association of Cannabis and Hemp. ATACH promotes the expansion of legal marijuana sales for industrial, medical and adult recreational use, and its members include businesses in the marijuana and hemp industry, as well as established companies looking to enter it. According to both sides, it's the first time a national cannabis trade organization has teamed up with an Am Law 100 law firm.
ATACH's board of directors includes representatives of companies directly dependent on cannabis—like Medicine Man, a large dispensary in Chicago—as well as companies with specialized products and services that entered the cannabis industry more recently, like Boveda Inc., which creates humidity-controlled packaging for specific products, now including cannabis.
In a statement, ATACH president Michael Bronstein called the arrangement “a game changer.”
“Over the last few years, Duane Morris' lawyers have demonstrated they are uniquely qualified to provide a full range of legal services to the cannabis industry, having advised big-time market movers, ancillary businesses and startups alike throughout the U.S. and abroad,” Bronstein said.
Duane Morris has a presence in 14 of the states that have legalized cannabis for medical use, and in five of the states that have legalized recreational use by adults. Clients of its practice include cannabis operators, retailers and financiers like Woodstock Products Co. International, Tidal Royalty Corp., iAnthus Capital and Green Thumb Industries.
According to Seth Goldberg, chair of the firm's cannabis practice group, Duane Morris has been representing clients in cannabis-related issues since 2015. He noted that it has dovetailed well with the firm's existing pharmaceutical and medical device practice and its life sciences practice.
Through the arrangement, Duane Morris and ATACH will work together on educational events and serve as a resource to one another, he said. The partnership will allow the law firm to raise its profile among cannabis businesses, Goldberg said, and connect with potential clients.
“Both ATACH and Duane Morris want to contribute to the emergence of the cannabis industry and to support the industry leaders in driving the cannabis industry to greater heights,” Goldberg said.
Not long ago, Big Law firms were hesitant to become linked with the cannabis industry. Even now, as more U.S. states—and, recently, the entirety of Canada—legalize the substance within their own bounds, the U.S. Department of Justice categorizes marijuana as an illegal drug.
Still, changes to the state laws and bar association ethical guidance have been followed by greater firm interest in cannabis law.
“I think the number of law firms getting involved and being more public about their involvement is really a reflection of the growth of the industry, and the fact that it has really become a consumer products industry with the kinds of commercial arrangements, the kinds of real property arrangements, the kinds of tax issues, the kinds of financial transactions that require legal services,” Goldberg said.
“It's been our view that the conflict between the federal and state regulatory structures requires lawyers to be advising businesses and individuals who want to participate in the state legal space,” he added.
And though the marketplace is young, the deals and cases cannabis lawyers are working on aren't all small.
Last week, for instance, Illinois-based PharmaCann, founded by ex-partners of law firm Polsinelli, was sold to MedMen Enterprises for $682 million. The companies' in-house lawyers led the deal, co-founder Jeremy Unruh told The American Lawyer, though locally based Fox Rothschild had a hand in it as well, according to the firm.
READ MORE:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'The World Didn't End This Morning': Phila. Firm Leaders Respond to Election Results
4 minute readSettlement With Kleinbard in Diversity Contracting Tiff Allows Pa. Lawyer to Avoid Sanctions
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250