$44M Judgment Entered in Row Over Authorship of Usher Song
A man claiming to have been cheated out of credit for writing a song that was eventually recorded by R&B star Usher has won a more than $40 million judgment in a combined verdict and settlement against two men he co-wrote the song with.
October 18, 2018 at 04:10 PM
4 minute read
A man claiming to have been cheated out of credit for writing a song that was eventually recorded by R&B star Usher has won a more than $40 million judgment in a combined verdict and settlement against two men he co-wrote the song with.
The award, which included a $27 million verdict and a $17.35 million stipulated judgment that was part of a broader settlement, was entered in a Philadelphia state court last week.
According to court records, a jury awarded plaintiff Daniel Marino $6.75 million in compensatory damages and $20.25 million in punitive damages against William Guice, a co-writer defendant, who had defaulted in the case. Two days before the verdict was handed up, Marino had entered into a settlement that included a $17.35 million judgment against Destro Music Productions, as well as a third of the ownership rights of the disputed song, according to a transcript of the proceedings.
Marino was represented by Media, Pennsylvania, attorney Francis Malofiy, who is currently pursuing another case against Led Zeppelin over the song “Stairway to Heaven.”
“The big thing in all these music cases, and I represent the creatives, is giving credit where credit is due, and that's really what we fought for the hardest,” Malofiy said. “We're happy Marino got his day in court after seven years of litigation.”
Margolis Edelstein attorney Jason C. Berger represented defendant Dante Barton and Barton's company Destro Music Productions. Berger did not return multiple requests for comment.
Guice defaulted in the case. The Legal was unable to find contact information for him.
The dispute stemmed from the song “Bad Girl” that Usher released in his 2004 album “Confessions,” which was one of the bestselling albums of the decade, according to Billboard.
According to Marino's pretrial memo, around 2001, Marino co-wrote a song called “Club Girl” with defendants Dante Barton and William Guice. The memo said the three had a contract to split writing credit and compensation three ways on any songs. The memo also said Marino was the originator of the song, as he came up with the guitar hook, the structure, tempo, chord progression and basic melody. According to the memo, Barton added a beat and Guice added the lyrics.
A man who worked for Usher later reached out about having the R&B star record and release the song, which was eventually released as “Club Girl,” the memo said. The parties agreed with the understanding they would each get their share of credit for the song, according to the memo.
However, according to Marino's memo, Guice, Barton and Destro Music Productions signed “secret” contracts cutting Marino out of any credit or compensation for the song. The two defendants, the memo said, made at least $700,000 on the song, and Marino was entitled to at least one-third.
Marino's memo claimed that, after the deals were entered into, Barton misled Marino about his share of the money. The memo also said that Barton at one point “explicitly acknowledged that Marino was owed money” and that Marino had “co-authored, co-produced and co-owns” the song.
In 2009, after the defendants allegedly lost contact with the plaintiffs, Marino realized he had been tricked, the memo said. He sued 20 defendants, including Usher, in federal court, alleging copyright infringement, fraud and breach of contract, accounting and constructive trust in 2011. That suit, however, was dismissed against all but Barton and Guice.
Marino brought the state court action against Barton and Guice in 2016.
In their pretrial memo, Barton and Destro Music Productions contended that Marino's claims were barred by the federal court ruling, and that the other claims failed as a matter of law. The memo also noted that the defendants did not have any insurance policies that would cover an award in the case. Although the memo did not address Marino's claim that Barton had misled him, in the federal court litigation, Barton contended that the defendants had both express and implied licenses to copy the song, and because the song's sound was never registered, Marino could not find success on an infringement claim.
Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas Judge Angelo Foglietta oversaw the trial.
“We intend to collect every penny for Mr. Marino from those who wronged him,” Malofiy said. “The judgment has tremendous value and it's our intention to leverage that.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPlaintiffs Seek Redo of First Trial Over Medical Device Plant's Emissions
4 minute readRemembering Am Law 100 Firm Founder and 'Force of Nature' Stephen Cozen
5 minute readEckert Seamans Snags Reed Smith Global Financial Intelligence Director
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Recent Decisions Regarding the Telephone Consumer Protection Act
- 2The Tech Built by Law Firms in 2024
- 3Distressed M&A: Mass Torts, Bankruptcy and Furthering the Search for Consensus: Another Purdue Decision
- 4For Safer Traffic Stops, Replace Paper Documents With ‘Contactless’ Tech
- 5As Second Trump Administration Approaches, Businesses Brace for Sweeping Changes to Immigration Policy
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250