$44M Judgment Entered in Row Over Authorship of Usher Song
A man claiming to have been cheated out of credit for writing a song that was eventually recorded by R&B star Usher has won a more than $40 million judgment in a combined verdict and settlement against two men he co-wrote the song with.
October 18, 2018 at 04:10 PM
4 minute read
Usher delivers remarks at the 2015 Kennedy Center Honors Dinner in Washington.
A man claiming to have been cheated out of credit for writing a song that was eventually recorded by R&B star Usher has won a more than $40 million judgment in a combined verdict and settlement against two men he co-wrote the song with.
The award, which included a $27 million verdict and a $17.35 million stipulated judgment that was part of a broader settlement, was entered in a Philadelphia state court last week.
According to court records, a jury awarded plaintiff Daniel Marino $6.75 million in compensatory damages and $20.25 million in punitive damages against William Guice, a co-writer defendant, who had defaulted in the case. Two days before the verdict was handed up, Marino had entered into a settlement that included a $17.35 million judgment against Destro Music Productions, as well as a third of the ownership rights of the disputed song, according to a transcript of the proceedings.
Marino was represented by Media, Pennsylvania, attorney Francis Malofiy, who is currently pursuing another case against Led Zeppelin over the song “Stairway to Heaven.”
“The big thing in all these music cases, and I represent the creatives, is giving credit where credit is due, and that's really what we fought for the hardest,” Malofiy said. “We're happy Marino got his day in court after seven years of litigation.”
Margolis Edelstein attorney Jason C. Berger represented defendant Dante Barton and Barton's company Destro Music Productions. Berger did not return multiple requests for comment.
Guice defaulted in the case. The Legal was unable to find contact information for him.
The dispute stemmed from the song “Bad Girl” that Usher released in his 2004 album “Confessions,” which was one of the bestselling albums of the decade, according to Billboard.
According to Marino's pretrial memo, around 2001, Marino co-wrote a song called “Club Girl” with defendants Dante Barton and William Guice. The memo said the three had a contract to split writing credit and compensation three ways on any songs. The memo also said Marino was the originator of the song, as he came up with the guitar hook, the structure, tempo, chord progression and basic melody. According to the memo, Barton added a beat and Guice added the lyrics.
A man who worked for Usher later reached out about having the R&B star record and release the song, which was eventually released as “Club Girl,” the memo said. The parties agreed with the understanding they would each get their share of credit for the song, according to the memo.
However, according to Marino's memo, Guice, Barton and Destro Music Productions signed “secret” contracts cutting Marino out of any credit or compensation for the song. The two defendants, the memo said, made at least $700,000 on the song, and Marino was entitled to at least one-third.
Marino's memo claimed that, after the deals were entered into, Barton misled Marino about his share of the money. The memo also said that Barton at one point “explicitly acknowledged that Marino was owed money” and that Marino had “co-authored, co-produced and co-owns” the song.
In 2009, after the defendants allegedly lost contact with the plaintiffs, Marino realized he had been tricked, the memo said. He sued 20 defendants, including Usher, in federal court, alleging copyright infringement, fraud and breach of contract, accounting and constructive trust in 2011. That suit, however, was dismissed against all but Barton and Guice.
Marino brought the state court action against Barton and Guice in 2016.
In their pretrial memo, Barton and Destro Music Productions contended that Marino's claims were barred by the federal court ruling, and that the other claims failed as a matter of law. The memo also noted that the defendants did not have any insurance policies that would cover an award in the case. Although the memo did not address Marino's claim that Barton had misled him, in the federal court litigation, Barton contended that the defendants had both express and implied licenses to copy the song, and because the song's sound was never registered, Marino could not find success on an infringement claim.
Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas Judge Angelo Foglietta oversaw the trial.
“We intend to collect every penny for Mr. Marino from those who wronged him,” Malofiy said. “The judgment has tremendous value and it's our intention to leverage that.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![People in the News—Feb. 7, 2025—Gawthrop Greenwood, Lamb McErlane People in the News—Feb. 7, 2025—Gawthrop Greenwood, Lamb McErlane](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/d2/73/0e1946234c019e4d09a267f4357a/stephen-mcdonnell-767x633.jpg)
![People in the News—Feb. 6, 2025—Unruh Turner, Fox Rothschild People in the News—Feb. 6, 2025—Unruh Turner, Fox Rothschild](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/14/7d/ea43aec34ae6988454264d4c693a/daniel-lepera-767x633.jpg)
![Feasting, Pledging, and Wagering, Philly Attorneys Prepare for Super Bowl Feasting, Pledging, and Wagering, Philly Attorneys Prepare for Super Bowl](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/d4/c0/a6fa9c04473f8fa9491f7e9e6e20/polsinelli-philly-team-767x633.jpg)
Feasting, Pledging, and Wagering, Philly Attorneys Prepare for Super Bowl
3 minute read![TikTok Opts Not to Take Section 230 Immunity Fight to U.S. Supreme Court TikTok Opts Not to Take Section 230 Immunity Fight to U.S. Supreme Court](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/thelegalintelligencer/contrib/content/uploads/sites/292/2022/04/TikTok-App-13-767x633-1.jpg)
TikTok Opts Not to Take Section 230 Immunity Fight to U.S. Supreme Court
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1States Accuse Trump of Thwarting Court's Funding Restoration Order
- 2Microsoft Becomes Latest Tech Company to Face Claims of Stealing Marketing Commissions From Influencers
- 3Coral Gables Attorney Busted for Stalking Lawyer
- 4Trump's DOJ Delays Releasing Jan. 6 FBI Agents List Under Consent Order
- 5Securities Report Says That 2024 Settlements Passed a Total of $5.2B
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.